The sudden assertion of human criteria within a dehumanising framework of political manipulation can be like a flash of lightning illuminating a dark landscape
The sudden assertion of human criteria within a dehumanising framework of political manipulation can be like a flash of lightning illuminating a dark landscape
NavigationThe World
Our writers |
![]() |
Jacqueline Rose: high-tech, highbrow primitivism
The German sociologist August Bebel coined the phrase the socialism of fools, it was aimed at academics and radical activists who tried to put a positive spin on their anti-Semitic politics. Ok, I admit that Jacqueline Rose is not a traditional, old school anti-Semite, but her tendency to promote undemocratic and other highly dubious ideas, all in the name of solidarity for the Palestinian people looks, in mine eye, just as foolish.
If you ask me, the Middle East has seen enough Western meddling in its internal affairs. It has been nearly 200 years of Western intervention that has turned that area of the globe into the bloody mess that it is today. And here it is again, Rose, an academic Western do-gooder, demanding boycotts, sanctions and other such interferences for the sake of the Palestinians. These demands will not help the plight of the Palestinian peoples but it will pave the way for more Western intervention in the region.
To me, in the first place, radical politics should be about the defence of human and democratic rights. Today however, Roses form of primitive radicalism seeks to condone Western imperialist interventions, whether it be economic or military sanctions or academic and cultural boycotts either way, Rose invites more foreign interference in the region.
Besides, Roses solution to the problems of Israel and Palestine are non-starters. She has no progressive alternative for the Middle East. All Rose has is an over inflated sense of self-indulgence; she demonstrates perfectly the Wests current obsession with the culture of victim hood. Surely, if Israel was as terrible as Rose makes out, and if Palestinians are the victims of victims and the new Jews, why does she not go to the West Bank and lie in the path of an Israeli tank? Of course, that is not the type of mess that Rose had in mind. If she did that, I would have some respect for her, because there cannot be any reason to endorse the politics of highbrow primitivism, or as Bebel put it the socialism of fools. The people of Palestine deserve better.
Submitted on Tue, 2005-08-23 16:12
Post new comment |
![]() |
Elections |
Posts: 471
Joined: 2004-05-05