The sudden assertion of human criteria within a dehumanising framework of political manipulation can be like a flash of lightning illuminating a dark landscape
The sudden assertion of human criteria within a dehumanising framework of political manipulation can be like a flash of lightning illuminating a dark landscape
NavigationThe World
Our writers |
![]() |
Jamie Oliver and the politics of an overpaid cook
Am I the only person who feels sick to the bottom of my stomach every-time the millionaire chef Jamie Oliver appears on TV or radio talking politics? Sainsburys very own proletarian poster boy is certainly making a big impression on the British political scene. Armed with nothing more than an army of dinner-ladies and raw spinach, Oliver plans on taking the authorities to task not over the Iraq war, but over an issue that is far, far more important
the fat content in school dinners.
Were it not for the death of the Pope, Olivers school dinner campaign would probably still be top of the political agenda. Olivers crusade is also a good example of how strong emotions and feeling are now considered more important than hard evidence, or a coherent argument. Olivers revolution has all the right ingredients, namely
children, and our political elites have been falling over themselves to get their slice of the action. Now all of a sudden everybodys so concerned about what our kids eat for lunch.
All in all, its a very sad state of political affairs when a trumped-up, overpaid cook can rise to the top of political debate, all because school dinners dont taste very nice. Even his criticism of school meals being detrimental to the education and health of our kids is way off the factual mark. There is no evidence that eating raw spinach will make kids concentrate more on their school work than if they ate a turkey twizzler. But why let cold facts like that get in the way of a rolling bandwagon?
One of the worst aspects of all of this, is that an unashamed publicity-seeking chef, with an over-blown sense of self-importance thinks he is more representative of the people than an elected politician. Oliver and others also seem to think that getting the government to add a few measly pence on to the cost of a school meal amounts to the biggest food revolution that England has ever seen. If you ask me, this is the kind of revolution that I find near impossible to swallow.
Read on:
Jamie Oliver website.
http://www.jamieoliver.net/
Submitted on Mon, 2005-04-04 16:05
Post new comment |
![]() |
Elections |
Posts: 471
Joined: 2004-05-05