Writing down what is?

Anthony Barnett (London, OK):  According to ePolitix Jack Straw is on his way to the USA and...

Justice secretary Jack Straw visits the US, where he delivers a speech on constitutional issues. "We now need to think very carefully about whether a British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities should be a step towards a full written constitution, which would bring us in line with the most progressive democracies around the world," he will say.

ALL progressive democracies have written constitutions, but not countries with written constitutions are progressive democracies.  If Straw's aim is, as it seems, to inscribe what we have, the UK will have a very unprogressive constitution indeed. We were the first to break the news that Straw was edging the UK towards a codified constitution. Watch this space.

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.

Comments

Peter Davidson (not verified)
13 February 2008 - 10:42am

I also heard this piece on Radio 4 this morning. He was using guarded and equivocal terminology.

This process might take a long time - he mentioned a 10-20 year timeframe

This process might end up with a bona fide written constitution or it might not.

On a positive note at least we seem to be moving on the right path but I remain deeply sceptical about the identity and motives of those controlling the pace and direction of this entire process.

A written British constitution provides a vehicle for lasting solutions to many of the ills currently bedevilling the UK's democratic and political landscape. Used constructively it could form the basis of a meaninfgul engagement with the entire British public about how we (those residing in the UK) wish to be governed and the true nature of our rights and responsibilities as individual citizens.

Formally defining the nature of the relationship between citizen and state and limits of each party in that contract can only have a profoundly positive impact upon our governance.

This story is set to run and run..........

Philip Hosking (not verified)
13 February 2008 - 12:22pm

Simply writing down the mess that already exists would be a lost opportunity.

For a different take on this subject and for a response to the JUSTICE report on a British Bill of Rights follow this link: http://cornishstannaryparliament.co.uk//resources//article.php?story=2008020519573245

Ray Bell (not verified)
14 February 2008 - 6:01pm

I've always thought of the British constitution as being like a block of fine sandstone. Looks nice on the outside, but is actually composed of all the muck that sinks to the bottom, and covers what was there before.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options