Trust and the war on terror

Subjects:

Jon Bright (London, OK): Heard this radio ad yesterday which I had to put a post up on.

[audio http://www.met.police.uk/so/docs/ct.mp3]

It's from the Met's "Trust your instincts" campaign - they are asking members of the public to phone a confidential hotline if they see any suspicious behaviour. We are asked: "How d’you tell the difference between someone just video-ing crowded place and someone who’s checking it out for a terrorist attack?" Answer - you don't have to, the Met will do it for you. "Trust your instincts: not each other" is the slogan that could have been.

You can see their point, of course - while we still, thankfully, live in an age without overarching surveillance, public tip-offs are an extremely important part of the counter terrorist operation. I'm certainly not suggesting people shouldn't phone the police if they genuinely think someone is building a bomb. But I also think this kind of advert, phrased in its casual, offhand manner, is only going to contribute to the general "atmosphere" of the war on terror - a low grade, residual fear, where everyone is a suspect and enemy is genuinely indistinguishable from friend. Can such an atmosphere, once created, ever truly be removed from a society? Or will we be living with adverts like this for the forseeable future - and with what consequences for much vaunted exercises building "community cohesion" and Putnam's vanished "social capital" ?

PS: Sunny Hundal posts on this on Liberal Conspiracy and adds a witty picture.

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it with attribution for non-commercial purposes following the CC guidelines. For other queries about reuse, click here. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.