Words matter

Subjects:

Anthony Barnett (London, OK): There is a lot of discussion about Obama's magnificent speech on race and America. In openDemocracy Kanishk Tharoor has a fine assessment and links through to it HERE. Elsewhere in UK blogland from NHS Doctor to Sunny Hundal to Gracchi, to an understated gloat that the speech 'won't work' on harry's place, there is genuine interest on the left. The British right seems less plussed despite efforts to project Cameron as the UK's Obama when his rhetoric seemed like a game, a sort of knights move that traditional Tories could play. Indeed they seem at a loss for words. Especially interesting as Obama explicitly highlights the point that his faith embraces a politically conservative self-help  tradition. There are two things to note, one tactical in US terms and a larger one that relates to the poverty of politics in this country.

We can say for sure that the test the US site Politico set before the speech has been passed: "A successful address would go a long way toward answering Hillary Rodham Clinton’s complaint that Obama has never shown he can handle the rough-and-tumble nature of modern political combat". He was on the ropes and fought back and did so his way.

But anyone who watches the speech - and if you don't you are not interested in politics that matters - will see that here is someone addressing a major issue with words that are intended to effect change. Hilary once tried to say that Obama was just good at speeches not deeds and lost that one. Any society that wishes to look forward has to talk about this. Only a society that is traumatised by the need to remain the same celebrates silence as wisdom and argument as "chatter".

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.

Comments

Fr. J. (not verified)
21 March 2008 - 8:32pm

I really dont think you are paying close enough attention from over there on the island. Obama's numbers are falling because he made some very big mistakes in that speech:

He compared Rev. Wright's racial hate sermonizing to:

1. sermons of other priests, ministers and rabbis. Americans are a religious people and they know their ministers dont preach hate like that.

2. Geraldine Ferraro: she had said his race had helped him. Americans love the underdog and the heartwarming story of come from behind victory. We all thought it. She said it. And it was nothing like Rev. White's hate speech.

3. his grandmother. Whatever his grandmother said, it was not the equivalent of leading a Klan rally as Rev. Wright was.

You may have some kind of quaint point of view from the UK. American society and politics is a lot more complicated than you have accounted for in your rosy analysis.

What is more, there is a whole lot more race baiting in Obama's past that is about to come to the surface. It's gonna get uglier and uglier. Obama is finished.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options