Tory MP Mark Field redraws the Union

Anthony Barnett (London, OK): Its been hard - so far - to get Conservatives to write for OurKingdom about how they see the future of the Union. Mark Field, MP for the Cities of London and Westminster was asked for his views in a question session on ConservativeHome. The question was: "What should the Party do to minimise the effect of a surge in English nationalism as the next general election approaches? Is a policy of English votes for English Bills enough, or should we at the same time pro-actively seek to give the Welsh and Scottish Parliaments more powers over their economies?" The answer is remarkable, it deserves to be read in full:

I must confess I am wary of the Party adopting an ‘English votes for English Bills’ policy and playing to English nationalism. There is obvious inequity in our current constitutional arrangements as a result of devolution, and there is increasing disquiet from many in England who are concerned about the imbalances left by Labour’s political settlement. But attacking Scottish MPs comes across as partisan and negative. Our mission should be to maintain and strengthen the Union and avoid promoting a solution that could be portrayed by our opponents as putting that Union at risk. This would play badly not only in Scotland (which many Conservatives too easily regard as a lost cause) but also amongst middle class, Middle England voters who continue to value the Union and all it has meant for us. It also runs directly counter to the positive, optimistic messages that the Party is trying to cultivate elsewhere.

But of course it is also dangerous to do nothing. The British respect the concept of fair play and there is a deep groundswell of unease about Labour’s one-sided deal which must be addressed.

I therefore propose a rather more bold solution than ‘English votes for English laws’ which I also fear would be unworkable in practice. I should like to see the Conservatives offer all the British people a new settlement that is demonstrably equitable for everyone.

Since the expulsion of most of the hereditary peers, I have, in principle, favoured the option of a fully or largely-elected House of Lords. However, I recognise that such an outcome is unlikely to be within the realms of practical politics, not least as the House of Lords as currently constituted is likely to be hostile and there would be little agreement as to the timing or form of elections. I would prefer to see the creation of a completely new federal parliament. Four, full, national parliaments in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland with most of the existing powers of the House of Commons and over them a federal United Kingdom parliament, which would debate defence and foreign affairs, make treaties and administer a cohesion fund for the poorer parts of the UK. It would be funded by a per GDP levy on the national parliaments. There would be no need for extra politicians, as the national parliaments would send representatives to the UK parliament and meet together for its debates, which could be held in the old House of Lords chamber.

I appreciate it is a bold, indeed a radical, suggestion but I believe that the only way to restore the balance of the British constitution, which had served us so well for so long, is to offer the British people this fairer alternative in a referendum once we have won the next election.

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.

Comments

Tally (not verified)
10 August 2007 - 9:49am

"The British respect the concept of fair play and there is a deep groundswell of unease about Labour’s one-sided deal which must be addressed".

That should be The English respect the concept of fair play and there is a deep groundswell of unease about Labour’s one-sided deal which must be addressed.

13 August 2007 - 11:32am

[...] radical expressions from Labour Party members as we see here from a high-profile candidate or in Mark Field MP’s proposals on ConservativeHome we blogged in [...]

Phil Hambling (not verified)
11 August 2007 - 9:55am

There seems to be an increasing number of Conservatives coming to their senses regarding national representation for England via our own parliament. I and most people that I know are what you might call "traditional" Labour voters who wouldn't normally vote Conservative under any cicumstances but will never vote Labour again because of the way they have and continue to shaft the people of England. What would win us over would be for the Tories to play the English card and give us what is our democratic right, to choose how we wish to be governed, whether that be the status quo (unlikely), a devolved national parliament in a federal UK (most likely at the moment) or independence (increasingly probable the longer this issue is left un-resolved). On the flip side, my MP sent me a depressing letter that could have been written by Cameron himself that mentioned all the usual waffle about another tier of MP's, preserving the union at all costs etc.etc. so still a long way to go before most Tories see the light I fear.

Peter (not verified)
5 September 2007 - 7:37pm

In common with the Scottish parliament there should an English parliament,the 1536 Act of Incorporation (or Union) should be repealed and the National Assembly of Wales should be replaced with its own Parliament.

There would then be no further requirement for the House of Commons and it could be dissolved in common with the House of Lords as it is an undemocratic un-elected chamber.

It should be replaced by a Federal Government comprised of the existing British members of the European Parliament who would deal with international affairs that concern what would be the British Federation.

The three constituent countries of the Federation would contribute towards the cost of the Federal Government from their own tax raising powers.

I am quite confident that the Irish people are quite capable of governing themselves, once free to decide their own destiny, they could of course join the Federation if they so wished.

There is little doubt that if such a constitution had existed before the war in Iraq (and other wars too numerous to mention) there would have been no possibility of Britain becoming involved in a war which was not of our making or concern.

There is little possibilty of this taking place as there is vested interest in maintaining the status quo with the corrupt policy of boom, slump and war that has bankrupted the British people throughout their history.

It is time for a drastic change and only the decent politicians of all parties can stop this madness of attempting to playing chess on the monopoly board.

But will you listen? I fear that the answer is No!

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <br> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options