Part of the openDemocracy Network

Power2010

Breaking the monopoly of the professional politician: Guy Aitchison's idea for popular forums in Parliament
 

When you're in a hole, stop digging: Pam Giddy's advice to MPs who still don't get it
 

Ending the divine right of political parties: Steve Hawkins makes a radical suggestion
 

Les Miserables and Power 2010: John Jackson diagnoses the political class's selective crisis-mongering
 

A call to oD readers: Helena Kennedy calls on oD readers to support Power2010
 

More in this series

Submit your idea for the Power 2010 pledge.

The British Crisis

Do the public really want to change ‘the system’?: Stuart Wilks-Heeg presents polling evidence
 

Don't trust MPs' constitutional poker: Guy Aitchison supports the call for a citizens' convention
 

Brown's 'National Council for Democratic Renewal': Anthony Barnett on the Prime Minister's desperate proposal
 

More in this series

Navigation

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Ming fingers the ermine

11 - 09 - 2007
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Anthony Barnett (London, OK): Where are the Liberal Democrats? Why are they not fighting for their views across the UK's blogland? Why are they not pushing forward the liberal and democratic agenda? What have they said that is authoritative about, for example, citizens juries and local referendums? Why are they letting the Tories set the pace even on supermarkets? Tell me that I am missing a well informed and vigorous cutting-edge discussion of these things from the party built on principles that oppose the big state and big corporate influence.

Anyway, Ming has spoken. He's given an interview to Unlock Democracy. His description of his party's radical discussion paper proposing a written constitution with direct, randomly chosen citizen input (yes!), For the people, by the people strikes no high notes. It is, if anything, routine. So much so that I could not find the document on their website, and it was even quite a task to locate its announcement. He only catches fire when it comes to the Lords.

Our policy paper commits us to a wholly elected Senate. Jack Straw’s proposal to publish yet another White Paper on Lords Reform – the fourth in eight years – and to delay legislation until after a general election represents a triumph for those who seek to stave off democracy in our second chamber. Never has an issue with such obvious underlying principles – those of legitimacy and democracy – attracted such interminable deliberation and reporting by committees of the great and the good. The last thing we need is another report. What is needed now is legislation to bring about the clear will of the Commons, and the clear wish of the people, to have a fully democratic Parliament. Is that so much to ask in 2007?

"Is that so much to ask?" No, it's not. But the Lib-Dems must stop "asking". There is a kind of pleading, a we-know-we-are-powerless-but please-can-we-ask feel to their body-language. To succeed, they should command this agenda, so that other parties ask the Lib-Dems for support.

OurKingdom's blog | email this blogpdf version | quote
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet
This article adheres to the openDemocracy.net principles.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Tom Griffin (not verified) said:

Wed, 2007-09-12 15:26

"I could not find the document on their website, and it was even quite a task to locate its announcement."

You did one better than me, I couldn't even find that!

reply | email this commentquote

James Graham (not verified) said:

Wed, 2007-09-12 08:43

I would accept the accusation that the policy paper is dry, but I think that is a direct result on the party's internal policy making process which, among other things, imposes a word limit. A lot of purple language ended up on the cutting room floor. But the result is, I would maintain, a very content rich document. And I think it is the most radical document on democratic renewal published by any major political party in over a decade - that in itself may be an indictment on the political class.

In terms of publicity, I too share your frustration, but I wouldn't single out this policy. The party has been launching these policy papers (on local governance, on climate change, on tax, and a few that are too obscure even for me!) all summer long, to yawning indifference. I don't think the party can entirely blame the media for their lack of coverage.

Finally, on the question of citizens juries and referendums, I wholeheartedly agree with you, which is why I'm about to submit an amendment to this effect. Expect strong opposition to this however.

reply | email this commentquote

Where the typical Lib Dem blog reader’s head (not verified) said:

Wed, 2007-09-12 12:28

[...] for OurKingdom is going to get us anywhere, which is what Anthony seemed to be calling for in his post on Ming. Perhaps he should consider a short - baiting - piece on Lib Dem Voice. The response I got from my [...]

reply | email this commentquote

ourkingdom (not verified) said:

Wed, 2007-09-12 08:49

James, can you give us a link to the policy document, I didn't say it was too dry for me as I've not been able to find it!

You are trying very hard, but I don't think you should see what I say in purely party or official terms. A lively Lib-Demish think tank? A gathering of those purple words to be published anonymously eg by OurKingdom? Some Lib-Dem individuals speaking out, I'm told Nick Clegg was good at the LSE. Agenda changing should drive party documents which are the outcome not the cutting edge.

Anthony

reply | email this commentquote

Quaequam Blog! » Blog Archive » Is the (not verified) said:

Wed, 2007-09-12 16:06

[...] Anthony Barnett seems to think so. There is some merit to what he has to say, but my response can be found here. Anyone else want to have their say? [...]

reply | email this commentquote

James Graham (not verified) said:

Wed, 2007-09-12 16:10

The paper can be found here. The old Lib Dem website had a link to the policy pages on the front page. Now you have to go via a link marked "the party". I agree that's confusing.

reply | email this commentquote

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img> <map>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

Books from Amazon

Email Alerts

Fill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future