A further crisis that could change the system

Jon Bright (London, OK): OurKingdom was founded partly in the belief that points of "crisis" - when flaws in the current system can no longer be ignored - provide opportunities for democratic change and reform, and that the UK might be approaching one (what Anthony has called a "good crisis"). Several potential crises have already been well documented on these pages, but the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust have  released a report (opens pdf) today outlining another one: the real possibility of large scale electoral fraud in the upcoming local elections.

Austerely titled "Purity of Elections in the UK: Causes for Concern," it highlights, among other things, the importance of postal voting to our system: 15% of votes cast were postal in the last general election, which disguises enormous regional variation (fully 56% of ballots cast in Newcastle upon Tyne North in 2005 were sent by post). Everyone already knows that these votes are not very secure. Large scale postal fraud, if it were to occur, would certainly convince the government to make changes. But of what type? One worry could be that an executive enamoured of the potential of technology and committed to the notion of "multi-channel" voting (in the hopes of increased turnout) might curtail postal votes and press ahead with an extremely dubious (and potentially more vulnerable) e-voting scheme as its replacement.

This article is published by , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it with attribution for non-commercial purposes following the CC guidelines. For other queries about reuse, click here. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.