Quote of the day

Economic inequality is, in substantial part, a political phenomenon

Syndicate content

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Signpost Blog

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Follow oD on Twitter:


Join our Facebook group:
Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

openDemocracy likes:

Navigation

PAR ROBERTSON IS A TERRORIST: STOP BLAMING MUSLIMS


Posts:


Whosoever blames British or any other Muslims for bombings of London is a racist and paid agent of Imperialism otherwise they would blame individual criminals rather than believers in Islam. At these times when patriotism of many innocent law abiding American citizens have been questioned and their cultural practice , national origins and religion is being used against them we have evry right to demand why Muslims are prosecuted for supposed act of terrorism when Pat Robertson can speak freely like a Christian Mafioso suggesting that his hitmen should assassinate Hugo Chavez. Christian Terrorists must be put in jail to give credibility to the US War on Terror, or the whole concept should be set aside as Fraud against American Muslims. Muslims in America are as American as apple pie and should not be blamed by people who are looking for an scapegoat for their crime on 911. Not putting Pat Robertson in Jail justifies terrorism. PAT ROBERTSON IS A TERRORIST: Farhat Quaem Maquami More than a week after 9/11, on September 19, 2001, President Bush made the message to the world clear when he said that “anybody who harbors terrorists needs to fear the United States and the rest of the free world. Anybody who houses a terrorist, encourages terrorism will be held accountable.” With this frame of mind, in 2003 Iraq was invaded and Saddam Hussein was taken out and over 100,000 Iraqis are dead and many more are dying for the baseless allegations of the US government that he attempted to kill “Bush’s Daddy”— which rests on evidence as reliable as the WMD accusations. Then, why has Pat Robertson not been arrested and charged with inciting a terrorist act against a foreign head of state? Why is the same corporate media who is blindly ‘in bed’ with the US administration in its War on Terror not condemn Pat Robertson as a Terrorist? Why is it that Mullah Khomeini’s Fatwa to kill Salmon Rushdie considered a terrorist act, but when American Mullah Pat Robertson advocates assassinating Hugo Chavez, it is said by the State Department that his comments were “inappropriate.” No one in the Bush administration who is obsessed with terrorism has suggested having him mentally examined so he would be committed to a psychiatric ward or be incarcerated for inciting his followers to murder. This is hypocrisy! When people who have gone to the same Mosques as an alleged terrorists, even worship the same God as terrorists are as guilty of terrorists and must be prosecuted, incarcerated or taken out; but Pat Robertson can go with a slap on the wrist when he declared that: “You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with." -Pat Robertson is calling for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and nobody does a thing to him for crossing the boundary which supposedly separates us from terrorists. For people who don't get it he clarified his call to assassinate Hugo Chavez: " I didn't say 'assassination' I said ' our special forces should ' take him out'". Now this might qualify as "domestic terrorism" according to the FBI, and Presidents own Executive Order which declares that " Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use [emphasis added], of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its territories without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." The spirituality of Pat Robertson is similar to the religious devotion of Mafia Bosses and he must be treated the same way. Any religious leader who issues a religious edict, a Fatwa, to murder another human being has no spirituality and would be committed to hell by any God. Yet the inaction in this case undermines credibility of the US administration and reveals its duplicity and therefore its ideological bankruptcy. As a law which is not applied universally becomes an instrument of terror and exploitation by the ruling class. War on Terror sanctions in special circumstances if one worships the same God as terrorists, fit the cultural, social, racial, or religious profile of a terrorists (which is designed and fabricated by the army of mushrooming terrorist experts aligned and inspired by Mossad School of Graduate Studies) he is branded as terrorist and would be arrested, put in no fly lists and eliminated. This double standard reveals the fallacy of the so-called “War on Terror”: Aggressive Christian terrorism is OK, in the same manner that American terrorism is justifiable homicide. In this hypocrisy, any Defensive Action for protection of human rights, cultural identity, religious freedom, economic independence, national honor and any act of resistance by the victims of aggression is called terrorism. That is why the US imperial forces attacked Taliban Government of Afghanistan that the US and Pakistani Special Forces had created, financed , assisted and imposed over that country in the first place. They were US terrorist engaged in terrorizing Afghans. Taliban had not done anything against the US; their crime was their inability and unwillingness to deliver another renegade and US runaway terrorists Osama Bin Ladin. The US attacked Afghanistan because they harbored terrorists, in spite of their declared inability to control arrest and deliver Bin Ladin. History proved that they were right. Since, after 4 years of sustained occupation and devastating bombardments by forces of the most sophisticated and powerful army in the human history the US has not been able to find Bin Ladin or eradicate Al Qaeda. After all the Al Qaeda was a CIA Data base and you cannot eliminate a virtual enemy in a real battle field. Thousands of suffering, deprived and illiterate Nomads were put to death by Napalm, Bunker Buster bombs. Thousands were put in container trucks in the convoy of Death by General Doostam, the brutal US Warlord. Millions were driven out of their homes so that the US establishes its brand of Islamic Republic in Afghanistan. Nothing changed for the better and women were kept under burka and young boys are sold to Pedophiles and perverts. One terrorist regime was replaced by many agents of terror while the corporate media presented the US aggression as an act of liberation. It seems obvious that the Power to define Terrorism comes from the barrel of the gun and whosoever has a bigger gun and WMD stockpiles defines its opponent as terrorist and would eliminate it. In the same vein an Empire with unlimited means of destruction at its disposal may pre-empt natural resistance or fury to the imperial take over, by staging a terrorist act and blaming it on the technologically inferior nation in order to occupy it. Letting Pat Robertson go free in itself points to the moral and philosophical banktruptcy of the War on Terror argument. It demonstrates its internal contradictions, reveals its duplicity and exposes it as propaganda. It is only by this dialectic of contradictions of facts, not to be confused by conspiracy theories, that one might conclude that in pursuit of an Imperial Design for global domination the Christian Corporate ruling class in America designed and executed the perfect crime of the New Century and blamed it in their mythical arch enemy Islam as part of their strategy of global domination. It would also reveals that in the Crusaders gangster logic any one who is against the Imperial re-conquest of the world, any nationalist who resist exploitation, dominance and shady treaties and oil contracts, Muslim or not must be taken out. In view of above the fundamentals of 911 and now 7/7 must be negated and exposed as Negations propagated by the corporate media aligned with corporate elites. It is only through this Negation of Corporate reality that one may realize that 911 was an staged act to provide justification for an otherwise illegal and immoral aggression and subsequent invasion of other nations. Desire for Corporate World Dominance precedes 911 and therefore is the cause of it not vice versa. Muslims did not commit any act of terror against the US or Britain because they did not want to be occupied, humiliated, exploited and mass murdered. Pat Robertson has just regurgitated what is the practical US policy of "taking out" anyone anywhere by any means who would dares to question the US Corporate Interests and stands on the way of its Imperial Domination. That is why he is can go free!