media & the net

  • warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /srv/www/vhosts/www.opendemocracy.net/sites/all/modules/cck/content.module on line 1284.
  • warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /srv/www/vhosts/www.opendemocracy.net/sites/all/themes/od2/template.php on line 176.
Thursday 26th June

Pre-moderated posts; anonymous users can post

Hi,

We're experimenting with a new forum flow - all posts will be pre-moderated and anonymous users can post.

So you won't see your post appear immediately on the forum.

We're doing this because we're having some trouble with our user sign-up module. Until that's fixed, we'll be using this flow.

If you would like to become a community moderator --- someone who can go into the queue of posts and comments and approve or disapprove posts, please send me an email explaining why you'd like this responsibility and how many hours per week you could put into it.

Friday 8th June

Forums guidelines/ terms & conditions

The Site includes bulletin boards, discussion groups, comments, blogs and other public areas that allow feedback to openDemocracy and interaction between members and openDemocracy ("Forums"). While openDemocracy does not control the information/materials posted to Forums by members (the "Messages"), it reserves the right (which it may exercise at its sole discretion without notice) to delete, move or edit the messages and to terminate your access to and use of the Forums.

You must comply with any rules posted by openDemocracy on a Forum. You may not:

Thursday 10th July

The truth about television

There has been a lot of debate about the effects of television since the goggle-box made its entrance in our livingrooms. In this debate McLuhan, the prophet of the new media, takes an important role. According to him, man is ‘made’ by television, though, it will finally lead to his liberaration. McLuhan is a man of paradoxes. He challenges me to inquire his thesis. The central question in this article is therefore, in howfar is McLuhan’s vision on TV tenable? Before the arrival of the electronic media, such as television, we lived in what McLuhan calls, ‘the Gutenberg age’ This was an age in which the printing press of Gutenberg was the central medium and in which man was not really free. McLuhan argues (as far you can call it arguing) this out in the following way. All media have effect on our ‘sense ratio’ this means, on the balance of our senses. Every medium is namely an extension of a human capacity. A book is for example an extension of our eye and a computer is an extension of our central nervesystem. When one sense gets too much extended by a single medium, it leads to an automatic contract of our other senses. This was the case in the Gutenberg age. The printed book was the only medium in these days and the eye got the most pressure so that an ‘eye culture’came into existence. This extension of our eye had changed our whole way of thinking. By too much attention on the use of the eye we became cool, calculating individuals. With Gutenberg the rise of individualism began and community-thinking got under pressure. McLuhan shows us that a medium, such as a printing press, is capable of determining our way of doing and thinking. It can create us. Technologies are in no way neutral according to McLuhan: “The medium is the message.” But this does not necessarily mean total unfreedom. With the arrival of television there is hope as a matter of fact according to the autor. This medium has namely some attractive qualities. First, in this medium image and sound are combined, which means that the use of the ear increases. The ‘sense ratio’ gets in balance again. Second, the televisionscreen (in the time of McLuhan’s writing) shows the spectator millions of little dots that he has to process. The viewer only grasps on a dozen a second so that the spectator has to create the image himself. He has to ‘taste’ the screen. McLuhan calls the television therefore a ‘tactile’ medium. Because of its imperfect screen quality the television invites us to become more involved. We have to interpret and fill in the image in an active way. Television is therefore a ‘cool’medium because it has a low amount of information and it demands a high degree of involvement. More over, the information on TV is not a lineair, logical sequence of messages. All images, texts, and sounds appear simultaneously and mixed up. The meaning is not so clear therefore. And we are forced to use our creativity to get to a solution of the puzzle. This is a form of recreation. In the first place, television introduces people from different countries to eachother. It brings us common experiences Modern man is brought back in the ancient tribal relation again. Because of the fact that television speaks to our hear- and taste capacity rebirth of our feeling is stimulated. We then feel again the need in deep relations with others. The village community thinking will arise and the world in large will become a ‘global village’. Secondly, television changes us from rational, calculating individuals into creative, associative and interactive thinkers. This thinking was in the past only a gift of artists. So television will make artists of all of us, we will unfold  ourselves and thus will be freed from our on rational thinking based individualism. This process is unavoidable. Man has no control on the medium anymore. What McLuhan concludes is that television determinated us to be free, free to unfold ourselves. It will lead to a renaissance of civilization.  In my opinion McLuhan’s thesis is not tenable. Television is a synthesis of two old media, which both possesses qualities that make man stupid and uncritical. Those two media are the telegraph and the photograph. The telegraph introduced a new sort of information, namely a well of non-related, mixed up and unimportant information, that came from all corners of the world. This stream of information crosses the nation, but no one was asking for it. This had two consequences. First, telegraph legitimated the idea of context-free information, which means, the idea that information not necessarily needed to have a serving function for societal goals. Information became a goal an sich. It beame trading stuff. The telegraph made ‘all’ information important, everything was news as long as people wanted to pay for it. In this way the telegraph ‘created’ our thinking. We started to see unimportant information as important. We were not able anymore to discern between relevant and irrelevant information. In other words, wheter information was important was an unimportant question. Secondly, because of the speed of the mass of information that came to us from all over the world, the coherence of the information got lost. Information got fragmentized and was no longer a lineair, logical sequence of messages.Whereas McLuhan calls this a possive thing, he forgets then that all we can do with this sort of information, is recognize it and – because logical connections disappear – not ‘understand’ it. The telegraph ,makes humans to passive consumers of information. The activity of reasoning, understanding and giving meaning to messages gets suppressed and what is left over is that our critical capacity will implode. Then, photography complements telegraphy. She gave newsflashes from here and there a particular face. Because of the fact that photographs traditionally have the connotation of being scientific objective and neutral evidence, they provided information of an illusion of truth. Here plays the old rule an important part: seeing, then believing. The cooperation of photography and telegraphy made us to dumb beings. We believe what we see and don’t doubt the truth of the images. Because TV is the synthese of both media, the effect gets stronger since the interaction of images and texts penetrates the viewer. Our ability to be critical will decrease. Two factors play a role in this process  furthermore. First, television is comfortable to us. We have grown up with it since our early childhood and It was our most comfortable friend that teached us all about the world as we were young. The trust in this medium is born early. Second, television is associated with spare time and relaxing. It garuantees fun and entertainment. Media presents information as entertainment (the news ‘show’). In this way, serious and important information is presented as entertainment and thus important information is made unimportant. Television has erased the discours and we got less critical. We trust like a blind the images of television and cannot discern between meaningful and non-‘sense’. McLuhan’s thesis that television, although determining, makes us free is thus not tenable. It will not lead to unfolding ourselves. It shrinks our unfolding because it erases our critical capacity. Television determines us in the way that it makes uncritical, following sheeps out of us. We better free ourselves ‘from’ television and its prophets.

Thursday 1st January

Unpublished
n/a
Sunday 27th April

Berlusconi is taking over the European mediamarket

In the media I read that Berlusconi's company mediaset has taken over the dutch media concern of Endemol.
Do we have to worry in Europe?

The victory of Berlusconi has nothing to do with the 'exotic' nature of Italians, or with political left or right but everything with mediaconcentrations that can fall in the wrong hands.

Friday 25th April

Is the value of a community online, greater than the value of money?

Hello everyone,

I'm currently writing my dissertation in the UK about collective intelligence and the open source movement. I'm very interested in the motivation people have to help out in a open source community.

Monday 31st March

Fitna: A onesided, hateprovoking, discriminating film of PVV chair Mr Wilders

Dear Editor and readers, I have learnt with indignation about the''Fitna'', the anti-Islamic film of the right-wing Dutch politician, Mr G. Wilders The film is to be seen on www.youtube.com Warning: Shocking images As to be expected from the political views of Mr Wilders, the film is giving a onesided and negative image of the Islam, which is hateprovoking and discriminative [1] To legitimize his point of view, Mr Wilders is quoting some Qurantexts, which are used out of their context. Also he is referring to the terroristic attacks of WTC and Madrid, which have been committed by individuals and organisations, who are using the religion for their own political purposes Typical for his strand of thought is also the fact, that he doesn't refer to the political causes regarding those attacks An analysis: Religions: The fundaments of Islam, as of Christianity and Judaism, are based on the God of Love, peace and human rights However, through the centuries, politicians, religious leaders and military have used the religion for their own political and power aims I don't have to mention the Pope Urbanus II, the initiator of the Crusades, who broke with the fundamental principle pf Christianity by mentioning, that it was no sin to till ''infidels'' [2] I presume also, that you'll be familiar with the massacres of the Jewish and muslim inhabitants of Palestine, by the so-called Crusader-knights, all in the name of the ''christian faith'' Spoken about fanatism Also need to be mentioned the Spanish Inquisition, which slaughtered thousands of Jews and muslims and during the Reformation, the socalled protestant ''heretics'' Every religion knows its religious fanatics Stigmatising of the Islam: Typical for Wilders is his onesided and discriminative approach of the Islam. Not only he is making no distinction between the great scala of muslims, from ''moderate'' untill ''extreme'', his selective use of Qurantexts and his denial of the use of similar texts in the Old Testimony and the Torah Example of a horrible story of the Old Testimony is the genocide on the Amelecites [a nation, which waged war with the Israel from the time of King Saul], which would have taken place ''on the command of God'' [3] That this horrible old story has its consequences in this time, shows the existence of a Jewish religious fanatical group, the Gush Emunim [which means, the Blocj of Believers], who put several years ago an advertisement in the Haaretz, with a summon to slaughter all Palestinians, after the example of the Amelecites [4] Religious fanatism: Example by ALL religions The dangerous character of ''Fitna'' is not only the onesided quotes out of the Quran, but also the suggestion, that all muslims were religious fanatics First, that is a very small group Secondly, as being mentioned already, there are also ''christian'' or ''Jewish'' fanatics I mentioned already the Gush Emunim, who are also present under the religious fanatical Jewish settlers, especially at Hebron, who are terrorising the occupied Palestinian population [5] In the USA, the ''christian'' fundamentalists can be mentioned, who have assaulted the abortus clinics, especially in the nineties The Netherlands: Also in the Netherlands, religious fanatism existed, especially in the sixties, when IN THE DUTCH PARLIAMENT, a Mr van C Dis [of course NOT the writer A van Dis!], being member of parliament of a fundamental Dutch ''christian'' party, the SGP, defended the South African apartheid, by stating that negroes were inferior, being cursed as ''sons of Cham'' on the ground of an old misinterpreted Old Testamentical Story Yes readers, the Netherlands of the sixties! [6] Terroristic attacks and the political causes: WTC and Madrid In ''Fitna'' Mr Wilders is referring to the images of the WTC and Madrid attacks Of course the attacks were illegal and horrible, being military attacks on civilians, but it is demagogical to lay the guilt upon a specific religion All religions are based on human rights and love However, the interpretation of men is human work and stems from the own choice, for which only human beings are responsible Causes: Further Mr Wilders is denying here the political causes of the terroristic attacks, which stem from the political-military British-American behaviour in the Middle East The WTC attacks were a reaction on the American military attack on Iraq, with as humanitarian result thousands of civilian death, because of the use of clusterbombs and depleted uranium, which sickened also a great number of American soldiers [7] And not to be mentioned the UN sanctions against Iraq, which especially have hurted the elderly people and the children Because of lack of medicines, more than 500.000 Iraqi children has died The Madrid attacks were a reaction on the Spanish political and military support for the illegal second American attack on Iraq As in the first attack and Afghanistan, thousands of civilians have died because of the use of clusterbombs and depleted uranium WHERE IN THE WILDERSFILM CORPSES ARE SHOWN FROM THOSE CIVILIAN VICTIMS, THE DEAD IRAQI CHILDREN BECAUSE OF THE UN SANCTIONS AND THE TORTURED PRISONERS IN GUANTANAMO BAY, ABU GRAIBH, BAGHRAM AND OTHER AMERICAN PRISONCAMPS [8] IT IS NO WONDER, ONE WILL NOT SEE THOSE PICTURES, SINCE MR WILDERS HIMSELF IS PLEADING FOR A DUTCH GUANTANAMO BAY FOR TERRORSUSPECTS SINCE MR WILDERS IS OF THE OPINION, THAT ASYLUMSEEKERS SHOULD NOT GET MEDICAL CARE, EXCEPT WHEN THERE DIRECT LIFE IS AT STAKE Also it is to be mentioned, that those attacks, HOWEVER HORRIBLE, are a reaction on the structural American political and military support for the 40 years long Israeli occupation of the Palestinian terrirories [9] Mohammed cartoon: As well at the beginning as the end of ''Fitna'' one of the notorious Danish Muhammed cartoons are dispayed, by which the for the muslims holy Profet is being imaged with a bomb in his turban Again, yet apart from the insult to the Profet Muhammed, that association, that all muslims are terrorists Therefore it is to be applauded, that as well the Dutch prime-minister mr Balkenende, as the EU, the UN Sectretary General, as the mayor of Amsterdam, mr Cohen, have rejected this film sharply With all due respect for a number of Dutch muslims, who were relieved about the relatively not extreme character of the film [there was the fear of tearing or burning the Quran], the film IS EXTREME, HOWEVER It is stigmatising, hateprovoking and discriminative Again I wholeheartedly support the statements the Srs H de Winter, E van Thijn and rabbi Soetendorp, that the points of view of Mr Wilders have comparisons with the rising anti-semitism from the thirty years in nazi-Germany [10] From their Jewish background, they can feel, better then the average Dutchman [of course not to be named those, who are resisting against Wilders] the danger of those hateprovoking points of view Epilogue: Every military violence or torture against civilian people, hostages or prisoners of war is a war-crime, despite whether it is done by a regular army or a resistence group But war-crimes, which are inspired by religion, take place under each religion, whether christian, jewish or muslim Regarding that I want to recommend the film of the AEL Belgium [11] it is called ''Al Mouftinoun'' and also seen on www.youtube.com Warning: shocking images Of course everyone can form his own opinion about the film, but it represents the other side of the story Down with racism, anti-semitism and xenofobism At the end of the day, we are all people There is only ONE race, the human race Kind greetings Astrid Essed Amsterdam The Netherlands NOTES: [1] Article about the political views of Mr Wilders http://quebec.indymedia.org/en/node/27273 [2] non-believers in Christianity, in casu muslims See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Crusade#Siege_of_Jerusalem [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalek [4] http://www.cactus48.com/fundamentalism.html [5] http://www.btselem.org/English/ http://www.btselem.org/English/Hebron/ [6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_Ham http://www.helium.com/items/367210-bibles-blacks-cursed-godmany [7] http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/clusters/index.htm [8] http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2005/04/27/usint10545.htm [9] http://www.btselem.org/English/ [10] Mr H de Winter is a Dutch filmmaker and an initiator of a Different Jewish Voice, a critical Jewish organisation, regarding Israel See also: http://www.eajg.nl/uploaded/Mission_Statement_EAJG_English.pdf Mr H de Winter should not to be confused with the Dutch well known writer, Mr L de Winter, who is a fanatical Israeladherent and a notorious muslim-basher Mr Cohen is the mayor of Amsterdam Mr rabbi Soetendorp is a very respected Dutch Jewish liberal rabbi [11] http://www.arabeuropean.org/index.php

Saturday 29th March

Media Wars: China Takes on CNN

Media Wars: China Takes on CNN March 26, 2008 It's not uncommon to hear complaints about biased media coverage wherever you go, and ironically right now some of the loudest criticisms towards the Western media are coming from a country with state-controlled media: China. Generally, government officials can be fairly critical of Western perspectives, but the Tibetan issue has hit a raw nerve with many Chinese, prompting websites blasting the foreign media coverage in Tibet. One site, anti-cnn.com invites visitors to "see the lies" that the mainstream media has told about China. They've claimed of unfairly cropped pictures, and unjust depictions of the protests. Some of the footage from Nepalese or Indian protests was shown as Tibetan protests, and the descriptions of monks just wasn't violent enough for many. While many Chinese are fuming, and continue to do so, I don't think these types of details and criticisms really matter to the average international reader. For that matter, how many of us really understand the intricacies of the vast majority of ethnic conflicts that span across our international headlines? Of course, on the other side of the spectrum, the Olympic torch-lighting disruption by Reporters Without Borders, has been ostensibly absent from many Chinese media accounts. Even within China, the information on Tibet has been extremely controlled and limited, making it virtually impossible for Chinese citizens to receive any information beyond the descriptions from the government. Perhaps at the most basic level, there's a fundamental misunderstanding between the way Chinese perceive Tibet compared to the way many overseas perceive the situation. From a Chinese perspective, Tibet is China, and siding with Tibet undermines their national sovereignty. Being in favor of the Tibetan independence, at some level isn't just anti-Chinese government, it's anti-China. On the other hand, many abroad view the Tibetans as religiously, ethnically, and culturally different than Han Chinese, and are looking at the conflict through the lens of human rights and religious freedom. These two sides will continue to conflict, and perspectives might become increasingly polarized as the Olympics approach. While the Olympic flame might shine brilliantly as it makes it way around the world, it seems to be illuminating several areas of tension along its path. http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/345689.aspx

Thursday 6th March

Global Political Simulator

Hi, I've been a reader of OpenDemocracy since I was a student in 2001 but I'm registered with my real name so I've created a new account to post with.

I'm always interested in games that have an educational element as I personally played a lot of such games when I was a teenager and I think I did actually learn something from them.

Wednesday 13th February

Is internet TV the future....?

I have searched the many internet websites and have found the best free TV website I can find: www.viewmy.tv

viewmy.tv has thousands of live channels from the UK and across the globe and even allows members to upload their own TV channels and take part in a lively online community where you can take advantage of some great social networking features. I have set up a profile which makes viewmy.tv even better as I can easily connect with friends, blog, rate, save, share and discuss channels. All this is completely free and is great for me when I am at work or wherever I have a broadband connection.

Saturday 26th January

EGO - invitation

I would like to invite you on my webpage www.ego.riki.pl - an Internet newspaper. Check out an english version ;) I recommend an article written by Tomasz Sieduszewski "Who is in favour of the war, raise your hand and push the button" about problem of war in modern society.

Editor-in-cheff of EGO
Bartosz Wasilewski

Tuesday 20th November

Two film premieres demanding African freedom and autonomy

As the 50th anniversary of Ghana’s independence from British Colonial ends, two new films, from WORLDwrite’s Pricking the Missionary Position, suggest freedom and autonomy must still be fought for. Keeping Africa Small challenges Western NGO practices in Africa. However well meaning they may be, their programmes get up the noses of everyone – from fishermen to shanty town inhabitants. Godbless, Wofa, De Roy and local fishermen and women loathe the peanuts offered and sanctimonious lessons in good behaviour. They are not ignorant; they are articulate and angry. They want jobs and material advancement. As Godbless tells us: "Africans have big brains, big aspirations... and want to live in liberty."
Friday 5th October

E-voting...

Holland has now backed down from being one of the early starters in the e-voting field and now we are seeing the UK government similarly realising it's not the way to go; instead they are pushing for e-engagement, which is much more sensible. What are the experiences of our forum users on using web technologies (or technology in general) in the democratic process?

If I get enough responses on this forum, I'll blog it on openDemocracy; maybe in our new deliberative democracy blog:

http://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/dliberation

 Thanks!

 Felix Cohen

Thursday 13th September

Wikipedia – Good or Bad?

The original title I had for this thread was actually called The Spread of the Democratic Ideal and the Death of Truth, and I was two paragraphs deep into explaining the values and principles of the democratic ideal before it occurred to me I wasn't the second coming of David Thompson, and never mind that I was going to try to synthesize the ideas of no less than three weighty books into my efforts, nope, Wikipeida -Good or Bad, sounds about right to me. The fundamental question I'm after is whether or not the democratization of information via the internet is a good thing, or does it simply 'create an endless digital forest of mediocrity' that acts to 'collectively corrupt and confuse popular opinion'? A place where an unending number of narcissistic and amateurish posters, bloggers, and social net-workers post their own versions of the truth at the expense of undermining real truth and reducing as redundant and irrelevant the traditional 'cultural gate keepers' of the truth.(1)
Tuesday 10th July

Is the current media discourse progressive, meaningful or helpful?

It seems to me that Islam is seen as the vangaard of an area of human interest known as 'faith'. As such it is the serpents head, the lopping off of which will destroy the serpent. What is the nature of that serpent?
Monday 16th April

If I had a bit of English blood in my veins

In the last few days there have been debates about the 15 sailors who were captured by Iranians and released after 13 days. Should they sell their stories or not? Some were to have been offered a million pounds for their stories, and I think what stories? They were even not free to talk when they arrived in the
Wednesday 21st March

Time to organise!

Two news stories recently have shown that citizen journalists are increasingly vulnerable to attack from legal avenues. If you are a citizen journalist then how can you protect yourself and the growing group you are part of? 6 months and counting
Tuesday 30th January

on the surge...

Want some video demonstration of the futility of the surge? Check out this amazing sequence from the UK
Saturday 22nd July

I used to be a laboratory rat.

I have been recently back to China after several years of living in Europe . I was so irritated by the internet censors I
Friday 9th June

Re: The real bias in Wikipedia

As a child, in the 1970s, I was given a second hand copy of the ten volume "Children's Encyclop
Syndicate content