openDemocracy

terrorism

Syndicate content

link 1

link 2

Submitted by Candace on Wed, 2008-02-06 15:55.

Title, Pakistan’s Strategic Culture and Foreign Policy Making: A Study of Pakistan’s Post 9/11 Afghan Policy
Author Ijaz Khan
Publisher Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA
The book studies Pakistan’s Strategic Culture and Foreign Policy Decision–Making process with the help of Prof. Karl Deutsch’s Streams of Information Model and explains how and so why Pakistan made the decision to support Taliban, then why and how, in the wake of 9/11, it changed that policy, noting the difficulties it is facing as a result of the changed Afghan Policy. It is argued that Pakistan’s support for Taliban was a result of its strategic culture that had developed over years, that saw religious extremist forces as good and reliable tools of policy, more precisely its security policy. Thus all its domestic perceptions were woven around Pakistan’s establishment belief that Taliban serves Pakistan’s regional security interests best. The change resulting in abandoning of Taliban was more a result of external inputs which conflicted with its long held security perceptions which continues to be unchanged for most part. Thus one notes a growing crisis of state and society and more importantly of international credibility as long as Pakistan’s role in the ‘War against Terrorism’ is concerned as pro Taliban Policy continues to be viewed as a better option in a wide range of establishment intelligentsia, not just the religious extremists. The book ends with suggestions how and where to change Pakistan’s decision making process by changing its strategic culture, as required by Pakistan’s announced change in its Foreign/Afghan Policy. The study helps in understanding Pakistan’s role in the ‘War against Terrorism’ addressing issues of capabilities as well as willingness.
 Read the rest of this post...

Submitted by ijazkhan on Fri, 2008-01-25 08:46.
Guerrilla’s Merger into Army? : Unfortunate! Krishna Hari Pushkar Berlin, Germany In Nepal, there is ongoing blackjack discussion about the “Integration of Maoist Rebellion Guerrillas into Nepal Army” and most probably it will be amalgamated, this situation emerged due to State is under the control of Insurgents. I have personally criticised the model and way of peace accord since beginning because of its poor feasibility, now it’s hindering to go forward on agreed peace road map. State is compelled to make one after other frequent amendments as per Maoist will and strategy. I would say, “State lost dignity” in the case. However, I am not against the peace process, my concern is only technical part of peace process that drastically failed and now state anguishes with severe crisis.  Read the rest of this post...
Submitted by southAsea on Mon, 2007-12-17 14:55.
Everybody has a theory about who did it and Benazir allegedly even knows the mastermind and who planned the killing. O J Simpson and Fox Network received a lot of thrashing for book and show "*If I did it" *about how OJ Simpson would have killed his wife had he done it. Well.. this is an extremist's version of "If I did it". For the weak hearted, please beware that the arguments represent extremist viewpoints and you may find them disgusting. We are extremists. Allegedly we kill innocents. We also kill indiscriminately. However, our killings or whatever killings are attributed to us are not pointless. There is always an objective and we plan to achieve  Read the rest of this post...
Submitted by financepk on Wed, 2007-10-24 11:51.
Syndicate content

Stat of the day

2000km

The range of the Iranian Shabab-3 missile

New Site

Security updates

To subscribe to our hard-hitting security briefings, click

here

.

Donate

Join OK Mailing List

Enter your name
Please enter email address to join our mailing list