The future of copyright is being fought out between two polarised factions. Music and film producers like Jack Valenti are looking for harsher ways to deter digital copying: the users and programmers, like Richard Stallman, say copyright has no place in a digital age. In this debate we work towards defining practical solutions for the future, with contributions from Siva Vaidhyanathan, Brian Zisk from the Future of Music Coalition, Jason Toynbee, and 9-time Grammy nominated singer, Janis Ian. Also see: the interactive copyright timeline.

The iCommons harvest

Tony Curzon Price's article "The reinvention of scarcity" (13 June 2007) identifies a tension between Creative Commons's instant abundance and transferability of information and its capacity to act as the foundation for building progressive communities of knowledge.

The article has sparked lively debate, both at the iCommons summit in Dubrovnik on 15-17 June 2007 and around the blogosphere. Siva Vaidhyanathan, whose own article introduced Creative Commons (CC) licensing at openDemocracy in June 2005, commends Tony's "solid and well-constructed argument" which "deserves a full and thoughtful response" - and then passes the baton to Tarleton Gillespie.

The reinvention of scarcity

Exactly two years ago, openDemocracy switched to publishing under Creative Commons. Siva Vaidhyanathan made the argument that this license represented true openness and democracy, that it suited us in our essence (see "Creative Commons: Making copyright work for democracy", 13 June 2005). Today almost all of openDemocracy's articles are licensed under Creative Commons (CC) "advertising" licenses. This is a modification of the ordinary, default, copyright position. Under the license we use, the author and the publication allow reproduction of the article as long as: the receiving publication is making non-commercial use of the material; that it is attributing the material to the original publication; and that it is not making any modifications of the material.

The Magnatune revolution

Four years ago, inspired by the open-source movement, I launched Magnatune - an internet-based record label based on a model I called "open music". At the time, the major-label music industry was on a self-destructive rampage, destroying companies that attempted new business models and trying to create an all-pervasive "permission society". Their customers hated them, and "piracy", far from being seen as anti-social behaviour, was viewed as a strike against injustice: copying music illegally as facilitating the demise of a malevolent system.

Free culture: tumble down the walls

Creative Commons, the brainchild of legal scholar Lawrence Lessig, began life as a bold experiment in political ju-jitsu. The logic was simple: use copyright against itself through licenses that give away, rather than hoard rights, and creative freedoms will be enlarged. But as the number of licenses swelled and later contracted, reflecting an emerging consensus within the organisation, so their vision of a creative commons has morphed.

In 2006, Lessig began to outline a new role for Creative Commons (CC), arguing for the protection of an amateur, "sharing economy" with bridges to a traditional, full copyright "commercial economy". Whilst this model is applicable to some artists, it rests on a gross simplification of culture and radically narrows the scope of Creative Commons's work.

The future of intellectual property: Andrew Gowers interviewed

Andrew Gowers, commissioned by the British government to map the next generation's intellectual-property framework, explains his thinking to Becky Hogge – and leaves her feeling that the "copyfight" for a public domain of information has only just begun.

Brazil's two music industries

To outsiders, Brazil often conjures up images of sun, sea, football, carnival, in a neat, emblematic impression of national cohesion. Visitors might pick up on the class and wealth divisions that cleave the city of Rio de Janeiro into middle-class coastal districts and mountainside shantytown favelas, but they are unlikely to experience the latter unless they take an organised Jeep tour.

Meanwhile, from the point of view of the multinational music recording industry, Brazil is at once a potentially lucrative market and a cradle of criminality. According to global trade group the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), Brazil has one of the highest levels of optical disc "piracy" in the world, and holds a perennial spot on the United States Trade Representative (USTR)'s Priority Watch List of countries with inadequate protection of international intellectual property rights. The IFPI estimates the value of physical piracy in Brazil in 2005 was 85 million US dollars, about forty percent of the total market, and that the country has lost an estimated eighty thousand jobs in the sector since 1997 because of piracy.

US intellectual property industries, including the music and movie businesses, have powerful political lobbies and strong support in government. This means that the USTR advocates heavily on their behalf in international trade negotiations, especially with the big "pirate" nations such as Brazil, China, India and Russia (whose accession to the World Trade Organisation was vetoed by the US this summer, with piracy levels cited as a reason). But until recently, Brazil has remained relatively deaf to calls for intellectual property crackdowns from international trade bodies.

The IFPI's piracy figures only tell one side of the story, that of the powerful property owners. Music is a touchstone of what it means to be Brazilian: a source of universal pleasure in a country grappling with poverty and violence; a foundational aspect of the country's identity, if such a thing truly exists; and a form of cultural and political expression available to any and all segments of society. And the fact is that there are two music industries in Brazil - one that is the concern of the four major multinational record labels, and then everything else.

I heard this point made a handful of times on a recent research trip to Brazil. But it struck me most profoundly at about 4am on a Saturday night at a baile funk (funk ball) in Rocinha, the largest of the Rio favelas.

Sounds of the underground

The scene was one that is replicated in the hills around the city every weekend: on a rainy night in July, some 2,500 paying customers - R$4 ($2) for men, R$2 ($1) for women - have occupied the cement basketball court in a cavernous concrete sports hall. At the far end a massive sound-system is stacked on a stage, pumping out the filthiest, most bass-heavy music one is ever likely to hear. Rudimentary coloured lights jump from the stage but leave much of the hall in darkness, coming to life only as they shine through the marijuana and tobacco smoke hanging in the air.

Girls and women of all ages step around the gathering puddles in their high heels, and dance in styles of such sexual licentiousness that they would surely fall foul of even the most liberal public decency statute. The men, dressed in rain jackets, baggy shorts and baseball caps, are less forthright, but clearly enjoying themselves.

Also in attendance are a clutch of representatives of the neighbourhood drug gang, standing in the centre of the gym floor, and sporting a wide array of large weapons (favelas are controlled by drug gangs, and for the most part are off-limits to the police). Some of them are dancing too, occasionally waving an AK47 assault rifle or pump-action shotgun in the air in time to the music.

The economics of the baile or carioca (Rio) funk scene are not easily researched. It is dangerous to pry too closely into the inner workings of the parties, which take place only at the pleasure of the drug lords. An undercover television reporter caught secretly filming a baile a couple of years ago was brutally attacked and killed with a replica samurai sword.

Lyrics that glorify violence between gang factions are illegal in Brazil, and fall under the category of prohibited music or proibidão, so any such recordings found at a street stall that identify the singer could lead to their arrest. The other staple subject of baile funk is sex, with lyrics far too extreme for radio airplay. Sanitised or "light" versions exist, but they can't compete with the appeal of the real thing.

Like Brazilian musical styles of the past, baile funk has attracted musical seekers from afar. DJs from the US and Europe have come to Rio to taste the music and mix it into their own, and favela funk nights are increasingly common in cities from New York to Berlin. In 2005 the British/Sri Lankan singer M.I.A., working with DJ Diplo, drew on baile grooves for her album Arular, to critical and popular acclaim.

But for the most part the major labels haven't latched on to the music. It is still too ghettoised even in Brazil to appeal to the small demographic that can afford a legitimate retail CD - costing around 13-18 US dollars - and too specialised to be profitable to a mass audience outside the country. The funk scene's MCs and DJs cannot make money from CD sales, so their only source of revenue is performance fees, which vary according to popularity.

But the music scene that exists outside the distribution systems administered and controlled by the major labels has proven to be very profitable to the artists that perform it. It is called tecno-brega, and primarily originates from the city of Belém in the northern state of Pará. Brega has no direct translation into English, but roughly means "cheesy" or "tacky". Tecno-brega is a major money-spinner for its star performers, who attract thousands of paying fans to lavish sound-system parties and stadium-sized concerts featuring synchronised dancers in elaborate sequined costumes.

The music itself is not especially radical - a local flavour of popular music given a techno twist - but the business model that underpins it certainly is. Performers have no expectation that normal retail sales of CDs will provide them with an income. Rather, the discs, of which four hundred might be released in a year, are promotional tools to attract crowds to the concerts, which in some cases can grow to 100,000 people in size. Moreover, to the extent that the scene's performers do sell CDs, they understand the need to make those discs attractive to buyers - a simple lesson that has never been adequately appreciated by the multinational labels.

For example, many brega artists record their live shows in real time then burn copies for sale at the exits, so that audience members can head home with a legitimate R$5 ($2) copy of the concert they just paid a similar amount to see. Performers and DJs also give "shout-outs" to various neighbourhoods represented in the crowd. Attendees take great pride in hearing their homes name-checked, and eagerly buy up copies of the show to capture that moment of acknowledgment.

The biggest brega band in Brazil is also, anecdotally at least, the biggest act in the country. Banda Calypso is said to have sold some six million CDs in Brazil, but make all their money from performances and some proportion of DVD sales. Hermano Vianna, an anthropologist and scholar of Brazilian music, tells a story about Calypso to illustrate their success: while planning a feature on the band for his Globo TV music show, Vianna offered to negotiate the use of a Globo-owned aeroplane to get the band to and from a show in a remote area of the country. Calypso's reply? No need, we have our own plane.

Stepping on toes

After years of condemnation for failing to prosecute copyright infringers, the Brazilian government has recently taken up the fight. In 2004 a National Anti-Piracy Council was formed with officials from the Justice and Economic Ministries, the Federal Police, and private industry. In late 2005 and early 2006, major crackdowns on CD stall operators and markets in São Paulo and Rio took place, with tangible successes according to the Brazilian record industry trade body.

But according to Ronaldo Lemos, the director of the Centre for Law & Technology at Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School in Rio, these raids not only netted pirated products of "northern" pop stars but also the recordings of tecno-brega and other independent Brazilian artists who want their work copied and disseminated, because it is the only way they have to build a paying audience. To creative workers such as these, copyright is not a pertinent issue. On the contrary, the heavy enforcement emphasis placed on it is damaging to their distribution systems and successful business models.

CDs in retail stores in Brazil sell for about the same price as in the US, but the average Brazilian would need an income twelve times the national average to have purchasing parity with an American buyer. While the major labels often claim to champion Brazilian artists and their interests, this is rarely the case. Lemos points out that with the consolidation going on among the major multinationals, there will soon be hardly any Brazilian recording artists to pirate anyway - he estimates that between them the four majors will release around forty CDs by Brazilian acts this year. In a country of 180 million people, a significant number of whom experience and participate in music on a daily basis, this is a ridiculously small number.

The heads of IP-holding multinationals and the USTR see "piracy" in Brazil as a threat to the development of creative economies. But there is a serious argument to be made that ever-stronger crackdowns on what northern stakeholders deem harmful to their businesses are just as damaging to the emergence of new creative economies that have little to no reliance on legacy copyright structures.

Still, having witnessed it first hand, it is tempting to conclude that nothing the National Anti-Piracy Council do is going to make an iota of difference to the millions of Brazilians who enjoy, and pay for, music grown in their own communities.

Rip this: piracy and politics in Sweden

Last weekend’s pro-piracy rallies in Stockholm were a surprise even to local copyright reformers. George South asks, how many peer to peer file sharers does it take to swing an election?

Mining the wealth of networks with Yochai Benkler

Yochai Benkler's new book "The Wealth of Networks" is both precise and provocative in defining afresh the role of peer production in the networked information economy. Christian Ahlert, public project lead of Creative Commons England and Wales, interviews him.

Google: Search or Destroy?

Google stands accused of copyright infringement by two major American authors’ associations and a French newswire. But the tools the company provides have done more to promote global access to information than any other. Here, librarians, lawyers, legislators and thinkers discuss the rights and wrongs of an internet giant.

Global voices: blogging the world

The pioneering Global Voices initiative hosted bloggers from Algeria to Zambia at a conference in London. An impressed Becky Hogge reflects on the challenges it may soon face.

The online public finds its voice

The Open Rights Group campaign for online freedom of information, individual liberty and the integrity of the public domain is a new stage in the defence of digital rights, says Becky Hogge.

Mozilla's 'magic pixie dust'

Open standards are just as important as open debate: Becky Hogge explains why openDemocracy recommends the Mozilla Firefox web browser.

Creative Commons: Making copyright work for democracy

openDemocracy.net has taken a major step toward enriching global democratic discussion by adopting Creative Commons licences for its articles.

Practically, the use of these licences grant participating openDemocracy authors (including myself) more control over how their works will echo through the world of digital text. They will encourage free republication and dissemination of their articles in non-commercial media across the globe.

Democracy and dissent at the World Intellectual Property Organisation

On World Intellectual Property Day, Becky Hogge speaks to Cory Doctorow, who has been campaigning for reform at the World Intellectual Property Organisation for two years, about the strains put on the democratic process by the arrival of dissenting voices.

Patents for profit: dystopian visions of the new economy

The struggle over intellectual property is the concern of more than knowledge economy specialists, says Becky Hogge: it is a contest over freedom as well as technology.

This week's editor

Heather McRobie


Niki Seth-Smith is a freelance journalist and co-editor of OurKingdom.

Syndicate content