There is no need to even listen to the sceptics

I love hearing the tired consensus argument that always goes like this: IPCC represents consensus of the world's top scientists and therefore we must believe every word they say... Well who created this consensus of the world's best scientists? You will find it was the IPCC's own press release endlessly parroted by the gullible media. UN is a political body and IPCC is a political body. There is not a single scientific paper out there that proves that CO2 is responsible for the current warming. There is no proof what so ever that the 20th century warming is anomalous. All models are computer programs that are simply as good as the assumptions that go into them. If one assumes that CO2 will warm up the Earth that is what the models will show. Yet we are asked to dramatically alter the course of human civilisation at it's finest time in history to avert a hypothetical disaster based on this weak science. You don't believe me that the science is really that weak? You think I've been brainwashed by the Big Oil? Just have a look at one of the most prominent graphs that appeared in the 2007 IPCC Summary for Policymakers: http://home.earthlink.net/~ponderthemaunder/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/ipcc2007rfgraph.gif The graph depicts various climate forcings together with their current level of scientific understanding. Out of 9 climate forcing only two have a High level of scientific understanding. Only two! In other words IPCC confesses that they have very little idea about almost 80% of climate forcings! If you look at the uncertainty of say "Aerosol effect" you can see that it is possible that it could be presently negating almost all of the CO2 forcing. Add to this land use (albedo) and human impact on temperatures could be actually negative. We just don't know. This is how solid the science is. There is no need to even listen to sceptics just read the report yourself instead of listening to the prophets of doom and self professed saviours of the planet.