Receive a daily email digest of the latest on openUSA
Part of the openDemocracy Network
openUSA sign-upReceive a daily email digest of the latest on openUSA NavigationPredictive MarketsPopular ArticlesRecent: |
The World
Most discussed articles...
Elections |
Iran writes back to Hillary12 - 05 - 08
Ebrahim Yazdi, a former Iranian foreign minister, writes an open letter to Hillary Clinton in response to her promise to "obliterate" Iran. -------------------------------------------------------- Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton Your Excellency, In one of your recent campaign interviews you stated that: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran. . . . In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them" (Interview with ABC). This is not different from President Bush's stated policy towards Iran. The logic of threatening a total obliteration of Iran, possible only through a nuclear holocaust, is based on the "right of power", not the "power of the right". As you may know, chapter I, article II of the United Nations Charter states that: "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations." Regardless of any hypothetical attack on Israel, the United States is legally bound not to threaten Iran or any other country. In addition to the UN Charter, the US constitution prohibits such threatening policies. Article IV Clause II states: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." As an Iranian, I feel compelled to ask you some questions. First, why are you threatening "the Iranians"? Second, if Israel attacks Iran and you are elected as president of the USA, what would then be your policy and position? I do not agree with the rhetorical statements and foreign policies of Dr. Ahmadinejad, the President of Islamic Republic of Iran. However, while the military capability of Iran to attack Israel is questionable, Israel's capabilities concerning the conventional and non-conventional armaments to attack Iran is beyond any doubt. With respect Ebrahim Yazdi, Anthony Barnett | Wed, 2008-05-14 17:03 I was struck by her use of the word "totally". What every little bit? And how will Iran be "totally" obliterated without doing any harm to Iraq, say, or little Armenia, or Pakistan, and other bordering countries? It is one thing to threaten to use a deterrent. For example, "Tehran should know that should they launch a nuclear attack on Israel - the premise of the question - the US will use nuclear weapons against its capital city and installations". It is quite another to go out of one's way to propose genocidal and indiscriminate elimination of an entire society. Post new comment |