Quote of the day

The democratic countries must courageously show a willingness to apply the principles on which their internal system is based to the global sphere

Syndicate content

Login

Login or Register to be identified in your comments

Signpost Blog

Email & RSS

Sign up to oD's editorial summaries email:



Follow oD on Twitter:


Add oD to your Netvibes: Add to Netvibes

openDemocracy likes:

Why wait for good science?


Posts:


Wealthy nations can transfer environmental problems offshore and import goods, while developing nations are trapped into financing industrialisation in ways that further deplete natural resources. The benefits of economic development are apparent, leading to longer life expectancy and higher literacy levels, but also translates into rapid urbanization that for many developing nations, has meant they are heading towards major catastrophe. The supply of fresh water in Java is likely to run out by 2025 and is just one example. Surely this is evidence enough that UNGUIDED economic development does not automatically lead to better environmental management. This is because corporations and governments are not primarily motivated with an instinct for our long-term future in mind. There's a need for cooperation within society(s) and between governments to effect any real and lasting change. It will always be left up to ordinary people who are able to sense a direct relationship between their way of life and the environment in which they live and who measure the quality of their lives in terms of generations rather than a single lifetime, to transform their concerns into pressuring governments to ensure local environmental problems are dealt with. Environmental problems such as acid rain, ozone depletion and global warming transcend national borders, so must be addressed at a national and international level. However, they still remain everyone's concern and so need to become an integral part of our community education. There are signs of this already happening when our kids demand we don’t waste water in order to care for the environment. An outpouring of compassion came in the wake of the tsunami disaster and is evidence of our ability to put aside our differences in order to cooperate for the sake of others. It was a reminder of the fragility of our existence and power of the natural world over our lives, but also shows it is possible for positive human emotions to be evoked outside the parameters of party politics and on a vast scale. Why are we waiting for good science to tell us what to do? Message was edited by: Laila Message was edited by: Laila


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Posts:


Re: Why wait for good science?
true, y should we wait 4 good science....if u r able 2 read this and have the ability to think and act and breathe as a humun on the planet, then so called "good science" will become a {tool} not the way to change...look about u, listen all around u, educate yourself and attempt to see what is most important 4 u, 4 your community, 4 your world and this may involve some serious reflection upon what u r doing and y u r doing what u r doing...living in this "sea of wealth" in Canada, it may be as simple as planting a seed or walking amidst the thousands of automobiles, riding a bicycle or not accepting the dominant status quo machine steam rolling over all...understand yourself and u will understand others as they attempt to express their view of the world...let your voice flourish, be the teacher and the student...



Posts:


Re: Why wait for good science?
We cannot afford to wait for 'good science' before beginning to tackle climate change, however I do agree that we should allow our actions to be shaped by good science and by personal learning about ourselves and others. Science will always be improving so there will always be a temptation to wait for the next batch of theories or statistics before acting. We need to follow a constant cycle of learning, action and reflection in order to be effective. Ian McEwan ( 'Lets talk about climate change', 21.04.05) is right to point out that we shouldn't act out of the belief that something terrible is going to happen, rather we should act out of the belief that we are making a positive difference. We need to have faith in our own actions and in the actions and promises of others, if we don't we lose the ability to act at all. Faith is not "ungrounded certainty" but rather the ability to act with conviction without having proof of the outcome. It is not groundless but based on an assessment of evidence and experience. We need faith if we are to tackle climate change effectively because the problem is so vast and complex and has so many variables that science is never going to be able to come up with the perfect solution. Good science definitely has a valuable role to play but it should inform our actions, not define them.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options