- oD 50.50
This week's editor
No to TTIP
The period since 9/11 has renewed global debate about the nature of United States power and influence in a world being transformed by globalisation. openDemocracy writers - American and non-American - bring fresh perspectives to bear on the Iraq war, the question of empire, unilateralism, the "end of history", neo-conservatism, and foreign policy under and after George W Bush
Philip Bobbitt talks about his book The Shield of Achilles.
Behind the formalities of academic exchange between China and the US are deep human experiences and longings. An American scholar sees the story of his own visits to universities in Nanjing, Shanghai and Beijing as emblematic of the need for people of both countries to mingle freely in trust.
Modernisation is the key battleground of global political ideas, says this keen-eyed overview of openDemocracys September coverage. Two questions arise. Can all non-Western countries become modern? And is the US a help or hindrance in the process?
Britain is cultivating a wilful amnesia about the fall-out from empire and war, in supporting American calls for democracy throughout the Arab world. Applied to the Middle East, could anything be more dangerous?
The United States's “war on terror” threatens the hope for expanding democracy and freedom that was born after the cold war. This makes it all the more essential, says Per Wirtén, to distinguish between America's global military ambitions and the pursuit of a just international order.
Europeans dislike inequality whereas in the US, only rich leftists do. So argue three economists for whom happiness can not only be experienced, but measured.
The long-term trends in transatlantic relations are towards equality. After 11 September, will they be set back by an intensification of the unilateralism of Bush’s first year? Or will current, necessary coalition-building become the harbinger of a progressive renewal?
- 10 of 10