> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Who do we think we are?
- URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/19439/
- Published: 2006-08-16T06:08:21.000Z
- Updated: 2019-02-14T22:35:07.000Z
- Author: openDemocracy Supporters
- Tags: #en, #Migrated, #Import 2026-04-09 18:23

In the media biz it's often considered a mark of success to get [criticism](http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2006/08/15/open-democracy-karl-marx-and-hezbollah?ref=opendemocracy.net) from both left and right - as if that in itself were an expression of balance. At openDemocracy we don't strive for balance or even pretend to. Our goal is to present readers with a range of views and create an environment where people feel welcomed and challenged no matter what they opine. We still get our fair share of hate mail and negative blog posts from people who are ready to judge on individual articles, [funders](../../../about/about%5Fod%5Ffunding.jsp), or [contributors](../../../about/about%5Fod%5Fcontributors.jsp). Well good luck [trying to figure out](http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/pen-l/2003w24/msg00193.htm?ref=opendemocracy.net) what the sinister plan is, because the only one [I can think of](../../../about/index.jsp) involves a free exchange of ideas and defense of democracy and human rights. But the butterfly *is* freaky. If you move your mouse over it the wings flap. Chaos theory as editorial strategy? Thank you New Statesman for recognising openDemocracy as the [best independent media](http://www.newstatesman.co.uk/nma/nma2006/nma2006winners.php?ref=opendemocracy.net) of 2006\. As for lavish funding, we should be so lucky. Please [donate](../../../donate.jsp) here, if you like the website. And do keep us on our toes. In the [forums](../../../other%5Fcontent/aggregation.jsp) and in [your blogs](http://technorati.com/search/opendemocracy?ref=opendemocracy.net). We do listen.