> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# The Arab revolutions: an end to dogma
- URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/arab-revolutions-end-to-dogma/
- Published: 2011-06-24T11:06:41.000Z
- Updated: 2019-02-14T22:12:10.000Z
- Description: The popular uprisings in the Arab world are a great disaster for a radical camp led by Syria-Iran and long indulged by media such as al-Jazeera. A great opportunity follows, says Hazem Saghieh.
- Author: Hazem Saghieh
- Tags: Middle East & North Africa, #Migrated, Politics & activism, democracy & power, middle east, Democracy and government, Syria, Qatar, Iran, Social innovation, International politics, #en, #Import 2026-04-09 17:11

The radical, pro-Iranian pro-Syrian camp in the middle east is extremely confused nowadays. The Arab revolutions which at first triggered its enthusiasm and energy have [turned](http://www.opendemocracy.net/hazem-saghieh/other-arab-exception) out to be very different from what it expected and hoped for.  
  
The [Tunisian](http://www.opendemocracy.net/goran-fejic/tunisia-or-democracy%E2%80%99s-future-in-jasmine) revolution did not release any “anti-imperialist” sentiment; the [Egyptian](www.opendemocracy.net/asef-bayat/egypt-and-post-islamist-middle-east) revolution did not burn American flags in the streets of Cairo and Alexandria, nor annul the 1978 [treaty](http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Peace%20Process/Guide%20to%20the%20Peace%20Process/Camp%20David%20Accords?ref=opendemocracy.net) with Israel. The whole notion that the Tunisians and Egyptians were imitating the Khomeini [revolutionary](http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/iran-s-tide-of-history-counter-revolution-and-after) model, a notion promoted by the Iranian leaders, was proven wrong.  
  
Moreover, the radical prophecy that the west and its influence are going to shrink in the region was also proved wrong. The international [intervention](http://www.opendemocracy.net/mark-taylor/libyas-challenge-democracy-under-gun) in Libya widened the presence of the west and its influence in the Arab world. What is more annoying to the radical camp is that this intervention is welcomed by most Libyans and acceptable to most of the Arabs.  
  
Syria also contradicted them. Bashar al-Assad [told](http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703833204576114712441122894.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) the *Wall Street Journal* that his country is stable because his regime is “very closely linked to the beliefs of the people”. A few weeks later, the [uprising](http://www.opendemocracy.net/vicken-cheterian/syria%E2%80%99s-broken-spring-damascus-report) started in Syria. Damascus’s “steadfastness” and “confrontational policy” - which led it to support the Lebanese group [Hizbollah](http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization/hizbollah%5F3757.jsp), the Palestinian group [Hamas](http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/hamas-after-the-gaza-war) and the Iraqi terrorists who call themselves the “Iraqi resistance” - did not help much.  
  
Syria’s [upheaval](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12813859?ref=opendemocracy.net) might be the most important development of all: not just because of its central location and the influence it can exert on Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but also because Syria is the [bridge](http://www.irantracker.org/foreign-relations/iran-syria-relations-and-arab-spring?ref=opendemocracy.net) through which Iranian influence can reach the Arab middle east.  
  
The demonstrators in the Arab streets did not chant revolutionary slogans; they did not ask for arms or call for “resistance”. They chanted instead: “peaceful, peaceful”. The mood of young Arab people [differed](http://www.opendemocracy.net/khaled-hroub/arab-third-way-beyond-dictators-and-islamists) entirely from those of previous decades. This might change in the future; but for the [moment](http://www.opendemocracy.net/vidar-helgesen/arab-democracy-rising-international-lessons) it is safe to say that peacefulness has the upper hand  
  
The [al-Jazeera](http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization-vision%5Freflections/aljazeera%5Fqatar%5F4466.jsp) TV station, seen as the voice of Arab radicals, changed course. Those who believed its revolutionary rhetoric discovered the bitter fact: al-Jazeera had used that rhetoric as an instrument of the [Qatari](http://www.opendemocracy.net/khaled-hroub/qatar-prestige-and-gamble) regime and its ambitions. Qatar now is part of the international intervention in Libya; it is part of the conservative and repressive Gulf policy toward Bahrain. The Qatari emir [went](http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/14/remarks-president-obama-and-emir-hamad-bin-khalifa-al-thani-qatar-after-?ref=opendemocracy.net) to the United States to thank President Obama for “supporting democracy in the Arab world”. When Qatar changed, al-Jazeera had to change. This is manifested in its elaborate [coverage](http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/spotlight/syria/?ref=opendemocracy.net) of the Syrian uprising.  
  
In this context, two further aspects of the Arab [revolutions](http://www.opendemocracy.net/david-hayes/arab-spring-protest-power-prospect) are relevant. First, Osama bin Laden's death came as a mere detail. The uprisings killed Bin Laden [politically ](http://pewglobal.org/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-largely-discredited-among-muslim-publics-in-recent-years/?ref=opendemocracy.net)before he died at the Americans’ hands. Second, Israel has the [capacity](http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/former-israeli-intelligence-chief-arab-spring-is-good-for-israel-1.369074?ref=opendemocracy.net) greatly to help in accelerating the positive transition and curbing radical tendencies in the Arab world. At present, it is doing the contrary under Benjamin Netanyahu and the ultra-right chauvinist [coalition](http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-05/27/c%5F13895963.htm?ref=opendemocracy.net) he leads.  
  
But the cumulative outcome of these changes is a devastating loss for the radical camp. In their totality, they challenge the [dogmas](http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/the-arab-future-conspiracy-vs-reality) that have long poisoned Arab political culture. It is time for the dogmas to be discarded, and for real understanding and self-awareness to take their place.