> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# The new presidency
- URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article-2218jsp/
- Published: 2004-11-11T00:11:00.000Z
- Updated: 2019-02-14T22:50:04.000Z
- Author: Dominic Hilton
- Tags: #en, #Migrated, #Import 2026-04-09 19:17

John Kerry lost the battle. He also lost the war.

George W Bush won the battle, securing re-election, and yet the Office of the President of the United States *has* comprehensively changed hands.

I know what youre thinking. Either youre thinking Im a desperate fruit loop, or youre thinking, Oh, jeepers. Hes making another of those calculatedly clever-clever points thatll take the length of a column to unravel.

Actually, its a bit of both.

I repeat: Bush won, and the presidency has changed.

But  how is this possible? I hear you scream. Tell us! Tell us! Stop prevaricating, you maddening tease!

Well, OK, keep your hair on. Im getting to it.

See, the change of presidency has taken forty years to evolve. But, like a willowy segment of the human race of which I count myself a crucial part, evolve it has.

The last time a member of the US Senate was elected to the White House, his name was John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

I knew Jack Kennedy like he was [my brother](http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/article-1-1581.jsp), though he wasnt. And I know what hed say now if Id found a way to interview him for this column. Hed say: Sure, I got elected. Fat lot of good it did me.

Id chuckle, because Jackd have a point. Its like Ive always said about the presidency: you cant live with it, you cant live without it.

Take Bill Clinton. Slick Willie cant work out which is worse: being President or being former-president. Both suck, so to speak.

But the important thing is this: as [Hendrik Hertzberg](http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/?040607ta%5Ftalk%5Fhertzberg&ref=opendemocracy.net) wrote in the *New Yorker*: All Kerry needed to become thoroughly presidential was the Presidency.

Spot on. And yet still Kerry lost.

It is hard to know what to make of the John F Kerry campaign. The guy looked like Abe Lincoln. He spoke perfect presidentese. His manner was all patrician, patriot, president. Hed have eased into the role like a seasoned Hollywood actor. Except that he wasnt a Hollywood actor. A Hollywood actor wouldve been elected. Kerry was a politician, and it worked against him.

He shouldnt take it personally. Ive never been elected president either. After a while, you learn to temper the bitterness. Though Im not pretending its easy.

The fact is no one like JFK II has been elected to the Oval Office since JFK I. The closest example was Bush 41, but he doesnt count because he was the Gippers Veep. Bush 43 is now the norm. Clinton II is the only way the trend might be broken. But Bush 43 is more Clinton I than Bush 41.

The one thing you dont want to have if youre running for the White House is Washington experience. Much better to be dog-catcher in Sallisaw, Oklahoma, than have served a couple of decades in the Senate.

As Bush said about his opponent in the second presidential debate: Hes got a record. Hes been in the Senate twenty years. You can run, but you cant hide.

Hidden qualities, and I mean *really* hidden, are your best hope of winning the presidency.

If Kerry had won, the Office of the President of the United States wouldve looked more like we *expect* it to look. John F Kerry was the archetypal American president; the Prez who pops up in the movies, begging a superhero to save America (and, if theres any time left, the World).

John Kerry was the first presidential candidate America has actually seen bid for the presidency in many a year.

But the presidency is in danger of no longer being presidential. Bushs appeal rests on his being more dog-catcher than president. In America, an ideological rebel can build a successful career on the state level, say John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge in [*The Right Nation: why America is different* ](http://www.penguin.co.uk/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,0%5F0713997389,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net).

*Vanity Fair* ran a cartoon this summer depicting Dubya in a Stetson too big for his head, so covering his eyes. But that, I insist, is the whole attraction of the man. Hes not one of them! Hes not presidential. The office is too big for him. And thats what we love!

Bush is best with his sleeves rolled up. Frankly, Kerry would look *parfait* perusing the porcelain in the White House [China Room](http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/whtour/?ref=opendemocracy.net), but downright ghastly trying to hoedown with the hicks.

Yes, the presidency is changing. It is becoming, for want of a better phrase, more Bush than Kerry; more Mel Brooks than  ooh, I dont know, Orson Welles, perhaps.

The BBCs [Will Walden](http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3990771.stm?ref=opendemocracy.net) put a slightly different twist on it: Americans revere the office, not the man, but in choosing the man, they want someone who befits the office, and in a time of war that office befitted George W Bush best.

Well, this is only just about true, and only because George W Bush now *is* the office. (In the same article, Walden also offered the striking insight: There had never been a post-9/11 election before, because there had never been a 9/11.)

I love all the presidents, but President Bush is something more special. He makes you happy, the suspiciously named Georges de Paris, the Presidents official tailor, told the *International Herald Tribun*es [Elisabeth Bumiller](http://www.iht.com/articles/2004/11/07/news/letter.html?ref=opendemocracy.net).

Bush makes us all happy. Thats why we love him so. Thats why weve moved his longhorn steer furniture into the Oval Office and binned Jackies exquisite Louis XVI pieces.

Our fathers were never the president, but trifling detail aside, Bush is one of us. Theres nothing presidential about us schmos. We see ourselves reflected in Bush. We are all made in [Karl Rove](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl%5FRove?ref=opendemocracy.net)s image.