Whose American election?

Anthony Barnett
22 January 2004

2004 is a vital year for everyone interested in the future of democracy.

At its heart is the United States: its election and its relation to the rest of the world.

In November 2000, George W. Bush became US president with 540,000 fewer votes than his rival Al Gore. He won a majority of the ‘electoral college’ only after an especially contentious outcome in Florida – with charges that its electoral register was rigged, its recount intimidated and the Supreme Court decision about it politically prejudiced.

One thing leaps out immediately from this curt summary: to understand how America appoints the most powerful man in the world calls for a grasp of the bizarre, the arcane and the arbitrary.

Todd Gitlin’s new column has taken on the challenge of trying to explain all this and to decipher the political forces that will decide if George W. Bush is re-elected in November 2004. openDemocracy.net has asked him to express his patriotism and not to hold back on his passion for his country, while speaking to readers of every nationality.

These readers include many Americans. A number may share the judgment that more is at stake in their country’s election than solely national well-being and security. In the age of the single ‘superpower’, America’s president is a ruler who matters to people in every corner of planet earth.

Hence the title of Todd’s column: “Our election year”. This is America’s election, but also the world’s. The “we” behind the “our” is both “we the American people” and “we the peoples of the world”.

In other words, this is an argument about global democracy.

The issues raised by this election year may start from the strange mechanisms of the US election, but they reach much further – from the universalism of human rights, to the globalisation of markets, communication, culture and military power.

Throughout 2004, and into 2005, openDemocracy.net will track the US election in a global context, drawing on the growing, international spread of our readers and contributors.

Expose the ‘dark money’ bankrolling our politics

US Christian ‘fundamentalists’, some linked to Donald Trump and Steve Bannon, have poured at least $50m of ‘dark money’ into Europe over the past decade – boosting the far right.

That's just the tip of the iceberg: we've got many more leads to chase down. Find out more and support our work here.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram