> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Austria after Hans Dichand
- URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/austria-after-hans-dichand/
- Published: 2010-08-20T23:08:54.000Z
- Updated: 2019-02-14T22:09:30.000Z
- Description: The death of a powerful media patriarch is also the end of an era in Austrian politics. After Hans Dichand, the spell of his flagship newspaper may no longer work, says Anton Pelinka.
- Author: Anton Pelinka
- Tags: Europe, #Migrated, Media & communications, Politics & activism, democracy & power, future of europe, media & the net, Democracy and government, Beyond Trafficking and Slavery, International politics, #en, #Import 2026-04-09 17:02

When Hans Dichand died on 17 June 2010 at the age of 89, an era in the relationship between media and politics in Austria ended. Dichand, who founded the [*Neue Kronen-Zeitung*](http://www.krone.at/?ref=opendemocracy.net) in 1959, was more than the publisher of Austria’s biggest-selling daily newspaper. In its best days, the *Krone* reached 40% of Austria’s readers. Dichand’s flagship made Austria’s media-market the most concentrated in the European Union: in no other country does one daily paper dominate to the same extent.

Dichand [ruled](http://austrianindependent.com/news/General%5FNews/2010-06-17/3188/Newspaper%5Ficon%5FHans%5FDichand%5Fdies?ref=opendemocracy.net) over his empire in the style of William Randolph Hearst, who controlled a rather similar empire in the United States in the first half of the 20th century; and of [Axel Springer](http://www.axelspringer.de/en/artikel/Brief-Biography-of-Axel-Springer-1912-1985%5F85853.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) in (West) Germany in the 1960s-80s. All three combined significant business success with a specific political message.

Dichand, like Hearst and Springer, was both a brilliant entrepreneur and a political missionary. His [success](http://austrianindependent.com/news/General%5FNews/2010-06-17/3188/Newspaper%5Ficon%5FHans%5FDichand%5Fdies?ref=opendemocracy.net) as a publisher was based on a kind of catch-all strategy: giving everybody something. His paper had a huge sports segment. Animal protection was always a prominent issue. The different local editions catered to specific interests in the particular area. The *Krone* published regularly the pastoral views of prominent Catholic bishops - and at the same time, every edition included *Playboy*\-like pictures of semi-nude girls.

**The shaping figure**

In political terms, the *Krone* did not follow a specific party line. On the contrary, Dichand seemed to expect the parties to [follow](http://www.bka.gv.at/site/infodate%5F%5F21.06.2010/6892/default.aspx?ref=opendemocracy.net#id39992) his line. The *Krone* staff consisted of a number of prominent journalists with personal links to political parties - especially to the Social Democrats ([SPÖ](http://spoe.at/page.php?P=104189&ref=opendemocracy.net)). The connections Dichand had established with [Austrian](http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521473057&ref=opendemocracy.net) politics were used to influence political decisions - not to be influenced by them.

Hans Dichand’s political beliefs did not [fit](http://www.bmeia.gv.at/en/foreign-ministry/news/presseaussendungen/2010/spindelegger-oesterreich-verliert-mit-hans-dichand-einen-grossen-zeitungsherausgeber.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) easily into any traditional dimension. In the decades under Dichand’s control, the Krone followed only a small number of topics with any consistency. The most controversial was a combative stance on issues [related](http://www.cambridge.org/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521673242&ref=opendemocracy.net) to the second world war; in his early 20s, Hans Dichand was a member of the *Greater Germany* submarine fleet, and was always willing to defend the “honour” of what he called the “war generation” - meaning the German *Wehrmacht*.

But Dichand was neither a Nazi nor a neo-Nazi (and he badly wanted to be recognised as a friend of the state of Israel). When his prominent columnist Richard Nimmerrichter (writing under the Nestroy-era based pseudonym “Staberl”) used [anti-semitic](http://www.axt.org.uk/antisem/archive/archive1/austria/index.htm?ref=opendemocracy.net) rhetoric, Dichand - albeit after hesitating for a long period - had him fired. At the same time, when he defended [Kurt Waldheim](http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/kurt-waldheim-453186.html?ref=opendemocracy.net), who as Austria’s president (1986-92) had somewhat obfuscated his record as a *Wehrmacht* officer, he also opened all the [gates](http://www.michaelzwise.com/articleDisplay.php?article%5Fid=6&ref=opendemocracy.net) of hate-speech - against everybody who dared to criticise Waldheim.

This was the [Hearst-](http://www.randomhouse.ca/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780679313441&ref=opendemocracy.net) and the Springer-like approach that Hans Dichand used. When he decided it was time for a political campaign, the whole paper - everything from the editorials and the daily poetry to the carefully edited letters to the editor - acted like an ensemble of armies under a single command. However his publishing-style may be [described](http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/news-brief-cover/276831-country-mourns-real-boss?ref=opendemocracy.net), it could never be called internal pluralism.

His final campaigns were directed against Austria’s membership of the European Union. When [Ursula Plassnik](http://www.bmeia.gv.at/en/foreign-ministry/news/presseaussendungen/2010/bundesministerin-ad-ursula-plassnik-erhaelt-premio-mediterraneo-diplomazia.html?ref=opendemocracy.net), foreign minister from 2004-08, seemed to be too much of a Europeanist, the *Krone* used any kind of weapon to destroy her politically. And it won; Plassnik’s party, the conservative People’s Party ([ÖVP](http://www.oevp.at/index.aspx?pageid=37421&ref=opendemocracy.net)), was cowed, and Plassnik herself lost her cabinet post after the 2008 election.

An even more impressive gesture of political subjugation happened in the same year, when both Austria’s social-democratic chancellor [Alfred Gusenbauer](http://www.austria.gv.at/site/3520/default.aspx?ref=opendemocracy.net) and his designated successor [Werner Faymann](http://www.bka.gv.at/site/5955/default.aspx?ref=opendemocracy.net) promised Dichand - in an personal, open letter - never again to violate Dichand’s iron rule regarding EU policies; namely, that an agreement equivalent to the Lisbon treaty must be put to a referendum (even though this is not [constitutionally](http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/au00000%5F.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) required in Austria).

**The last campaign**

The [king](http://www.styria.com/en/styria/person%5Fdichand.php?ref=opendemocracy.net) is dead. Who will become the new king? But also: will there be a new king? The post-Dichand era has to face the consequences of a rather diffuse ownership structure. Hans Dichand was the paper’s only publisher, but he owned only 50% of the *Krone*; the other owner is the [*Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung*](http://www.derwesten.de/?ref=opendemocracy.net) (WAZ).

The most important question is whether Hans Dichand’s personal heir, his son Christoph, and the WAZ will be able to [develop](http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2010/08/01/heute-krone-fasten-family-ties/?ref=opendemocracy.net) a *modus operandi*. The [WAZ](http://www.waz-mediengruppe.de/History.326.0.html?L=1&ref=opendemocracy.net) was never happy with Hans Dichand’s personal style. The Germans were interested more or less only in the profit the *Krone* was able to produce - and not at all in Dichand’s politics. One solution would be a buy-out that would give either the Dichand [family](http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/18237/michael-j-dichand-member-of-the-most-powerful-media-family-in-austria?ref=opendemocracy.net) or the WAZ sole ownership. 

It is difficult to imagine that Christoph Dichand (assuming that he is the eventual winner in the potential conflict with the WAZ) will be able to have the same kind of prestige his father enjoyed; difficult too to expect that the success-story of the Krone will go on and on.

The paper’s readership reveals a structural problem. The readers are disproportionally old and without higher education; younger, better educated Austrians regard the *Krone* as primitive and outdated. And it is at least possible that the politicians of Austria’s establishment parties, the SPÖ and ÖVP, will gradually realise that a paper’s circulation is not the only indicator of its ability to shape political attitudes.

The last figure who tested this proposition was Heinz Fischer, the Austrian [president](http://www.hofburg.at/show%5Fcontent.php?hid=6&language=en&ref=opendemocracy.net). When running for [re-election](http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/may/05/austrias-hollow-center/?ref=opendemocracy.net) in 2010, he was opposed by Hans Dichand from the very beginning of his campaign - for the sole reason that he had dared to ignore Dichand’s advice not to sign the Lisbon treaty after its parliamentary ratification. Fischer [won](http://austrianindependent.com/news/Politics/2010-04-26/2279/Record-low%5Fparticipation%5Ftarnishes%5FFischer%5Fvictory?ref=opendemocracy.net) the election easily - even against the *Krone*. Perhaps other politicians will learn to see this as a lesson. Now that the great and myth-laden patriarch no longer runs Austria’s most successful daily paper, there is every reason to break the spell.