Can Europe Make It?

Declaration on the crisis in Catalonia

We, the undersigned, a group of philosophers working at Catalan universities, declare: Español

A group
4 October 2017

lead

Roy MacLean/ Flickr. Some rights reserved.1.     We reject the police violence against non-violent citizens in Catalonia on October 1, 2017. In democracies, such violence is unjustified, even given the Spanish Constitutional Court ́s judgment of the illegality of the referendum, since the violence was not necessary to prevent the referendum. We call on all Spanish and Catalan politicians to abstain from violence, unilateral actions, provocations, and manipulation of the public. Free speech and respectful dialogue, guided by proper arguments and facts, must be the means by which to solve political disputes. 


2.     As a first and immediate step towards tension reduction, we propose to the Spanish and Catalan governments that a Commission be formed consisting of expert representatives of all major parties, including the opposition parties of both parliaments, with the task of building a consensus for the procedural and substantive norms for conflict reduction and resolution concerning this case. Furthermore, the Commission should include experts in national and international law, ethics and political philosophy, and conflict resolution. 


3.     Not only Spanish law, but also parts of international law, such as the Helsinki Accord (Art. 1.III), the EU Maastricht treaty (Art. 4.2), the Council of Europe’s Venice Code of Good Practices concerning Referendums, as well as the UN Charta, the UN Civil Pact, and Resolution 2625 of the UN General Assembly might form part of the legal framework to be considered. All relevant norms must be strictly followed by all involved political parties, decision makers, and nongovernmental organisations. Pacta sunt servanda. 

4.     Insofar as legal norms do not sufficiently determine the conflict resolution, the solution must draw on ethical norms that are to be discussed freely and accepted by the Commission. 

5.     While it is unlikely – though not impossible – that a consensus on procedural and substantive norms for conflict reduction and resolution will be accepted by all members of the Commission, the majority required for acceptance of the working norms should not be just above 50% either. In momentous decisions in democracies, with a long-term effect on future generations, agreements require clear and significant majorities, as is the practice for accepting and revising constitutions in many countries. 

" No one is born hating another person because of the color of his skin, or his background,or his religion ... if they can learn to hate, they can be taught to love." (Nelson Mandela)

6.     A negotiated referendum on Catalan independence might be one way out, though not the only one. Referendums have to be carefully prepared, require a fair, well- informed, and unbiased public debate guided by the ideals of a deliberative democracy. In such a debate, alternative options, such as more autonomy for Catalonia or a federal reform of Spain, should be fully present too. The Commission should develop such proposals and then send them to the Spanish and Catalan parliaments for informed discussion. With the consent of all sides, advisors from international organizations could help negotiate an agreement between the parliaments. Parliamentary as well as public votes should again aim at significant and clear majorities. 

7.     The conflict should be addressed in a way that recognizes that Catalonia is not the only case of an independence movement in Europe, and that the demand for more self-determination must be balanced with other important tasks and challenges that the European Union faces. We take seriously the claim of proponents of Catalan independence that they view themselves as Pro-European, unlike other nationalistic movements. We think that a pro-European attitude should include the consideration of relevant interests throughout the European Union. 

With these first steps, we aim to help reduce the dangerous escalation of actions and emotions at this critical point. These “chicken games” (Bertrand Russell) can end very badly. If the conflict continues, all sides may bear very serious and regrettable costs. De-escalation from all sides is essential and the reasonable thing to do. 

We invite all concerned citizens in Catalonia, Spain and Europe to join this declaration. Barcelona, 03/10/2017

Signed first by:

Massimiliano Badino (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Norbert Bilbeny Garcia (Universitat de Barcelona)


Victoria Camps (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Paula Casal (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)

Maria Ramon Cubells Bartolomé (Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona)

Encarnación Díaz León (Universitat de Barcelona)


José Antonio Diez (Universitat de Barcelona)


Anna Estany Profitós (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Christopher Evans (Fundació Bosch i Gimpera)

Alexander Fidora (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Daniel Gamper (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Manuel García-Carpintero (Universitat de Barcelona)

Victor Gómez Pin (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Iñigo González Ricoy (Universitat de Barcelona)

Carl Hoefer (Universitat de Barcelona)


Teresa Marques (Universitat de Barcelona)


Genoveva Martí (Universitat de Barcelona)


José Luis Martí (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)


Víctor Méndez Baiges (Universitat de Barcelona)


Núria Sara Miras Boronet (Universitat de Barcelona)


J. J. Moreso (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)


Serena Olsaretti (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)


Francesc Pereña Blasi (Universitat de Barcelona)

Josep Lluís Prades (Universitat de Girona)


Àngel Puyol González (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Jesus Hernandez Reyes (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Sven Rosenkranz (Universitat de Barcelona)


Albert Solé (Universitat de Barcelona)


Thomas Sturm (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)


Joan Vergés Gifra (Universitat de Girona)


Gerard Vilar (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)


Andrew Williams (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)

US election: what's going on in Trump's must-win states?

Our editor-in-chief, Mary Fitzgerald, is on the ground in key US battleground states – follow her on Twitter @maryftz for live updates.

There's never been more at stake. But the pandemic has kept many foreign journalists away. Hundreds of international observers who normally oversee US elections aren't there.

Can we trust the polls? What's the blanket media coverage not telling us? Hear Mary describe what she's seeing and hearing across the country, from regular citizens to social justice activists to right-wing militias arming themselves for election day.

Plus: get the inside scoop on openDemocracy's big 'follow-the-money' investigation – just broken – which lifts the lid on how Trump-linked groups are going global with their culture wars.

Join us for a free live discussion on Thursday 29 October, 5pm UK time/1pm EDT.

Hear from:

Remi Bak Policy officer, European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights

David Corn Washington DC bureau chief of Mother Jones, MSNBC analyst and co-author the New York Times no. 1 bestselling book ‘Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump’

Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief, openDemocracy

Lydia Namubiru Africa editor, openDemocracy

Get weekly updates on Europe A thoughtful weekly email of economic, political, social and cultural developments from the storm-tossed continent. Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData