> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# David Davis explains why he supports 28 but not 42 days
- URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/david-davis-explains-why-he-supports-28-but-not-42-days/
- Published: 2008-06-20T21:06:37.000Z
- Updated: 2019-02-14T22:40:57.000Z
- Author: Guy Aitchison
- Tags: #en, #Migrated, #Import 2026-04-09 18:41

**Guy Aitchison (London,** [**OK**](https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom)**):** In the first post on his campaign blog David Davis [expands on the arguments](http://www.daviddavisforfreedom.com/index.cfm?fa=contentNews.newsDetails&newsID=61590&from=list&ref=opendemocracy.net) he made on last night's Question Time ([blogged](https://www.opendemocracy.net/blog/ourkingdom-theme/anthony-barnett/2008/06/20/why-the-bbc-despises-davis-and-his-campaign) earlier by Anthony), expaining why he supports 28 days but not 42 days detention without charge. Some have labelled his position inconsistent but - whether you agree with him or not - I think Davis sets out a pretty straightforward case on his blog. On the basis of evidence he has looked at with the Met and the Crown Prosecution Service he says he "can support 28 days pre-charge detention - as a necessary evil - but not a day more. Once we have introduced intercept evidence and post-charge questioning, and developed the use of plea-bargaining, it may be possible to reduce the limit below 28 days, without any risk to our security." Read the post in full [here](http://www.daviddavisforfreedom.com/index.cfm?fa=contentNews.newsDetails&newsID=61590&from=list&ref=opendemocracy.net).