E-Poll idea for Iraqi women to have a say

17 October 2005
Thanks Yanar for spelling out so clearly what the hidden consequences might be for women in Iraq of the proposed constitution. The newspapers here in the UK covered the referendum with lots of pictures of women voting but not a word about what the constitution might mean for them. Instead there seems to be a great emphasis on trying to equate a ‘yes’ with withdrawal of the occupying troops.
This silence seems doubly ironic – not only are we about to mark the 5th anniversary of a UN resolution that recognises the positive role women can and do play in building peace, but we also have endless statements from senior politicians asserting that the true measure of a democratic society is in how well it respects the rights of it’s women.


So far the process in Iraq appears to be failing on both counts. Failure to recognise what a resource they have in the women of the country in helping to reconstruct their war-torn communities and failure to insist that women’s rights are human rights …after all it was  human rights that we went to war for, wasn’t it?


Simon Jenkins in the Sunday Times says of the Iraq constitution;…'References to human rights are emphatic, but balanced with those of the primacy of Islam’


There will be a whole spectrum of views as to what this balance might look like and what the chances are of achieving it in relation to women’s human rights. I’m sceptical but not alone in hoping it can be done. However as I attempted to emphasise in the Women’s Hour discussion -  Iraqi women themselves need to have the freedom to articulate what they want. But have they had a chance to say how they want to claim their rights? If anyone knows of any polls or research done on this it would be good to hear about it.


One way forward would be to take up a suggestion made by my friend Scilla Elworthy to start an E-POLL of Iraqi women viz:
·                 -                send an email with say 6 questions to all the Iraqi women we know on email
·                 -                ask them to ask their friends (who dont have email) to respond to the 6 questions and email their answers back to us, in strict confidence
·                  -               then in quite a short time we could have a very powerful survey
Scilla also suggests some possible questions:
  1. What is the most immediate need of Iraqi women now?
  2. Do you want US and UK forces to withdraw or stay?
  3. If you want them to stay, for how long and to do what?
  4. If you want them to leave, how can that best be done and over what period?
  5. Is your situation as women better or worse now than it was before April 2003?
  6. How can women from other countries support you?
If we had solid opinion figures on what Iraqi women want, we could use them in several ways - press, report to the FCO and State Dept, lobby Iraqi leaders, and support Iraqi women in an informed way.


Yanar and other Iraqi bloggers  – would this be useful?  

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData