Home

Gender and Social Change - Response to Mu

10 October 2005

Mu - wonderful comments. Thanks so much for sharing this. I totally agree on many fronts. Firstly, respect is the key. We have to recognize that different women have a different pace of change that is suitable for them. It's more sustainable that way, for starters. But also it demonstrates that the international community can truly operate with women taking the lead. Our role should be supportive - funding, resources, networks, etc. We tend to hijack a situation - as was done in Afghanistan - and assume that we know best what the women here need. An ideal example is the Western agencies and media obsession with the bourka. This became the barometer of social change in the country, leading us to assume that Western dress means liberation, while being "beneath the bourka" (as the oft-used cliche phrase goes!) was opression. A facile analysis that only served to marginalize Afghan women. I very much appreciate what you were saying about your work with men and domestic violence. I would love to undertake this kind of initiative with men here (as we witness domestic violence increasing in recent years), but I do not know of an organization that would support the activity. Again, we say "gender" but we mean "women". Even Afghans have adopted the word as a synonym for women. We lose out on an opportunity when we do this - an opportunity for further social change, with men and women together as equals.

I'd love to get your feedback on my recently-published report (pdf) on working on gender issues in the context of post-conflict (specific to Afghanistan, but probably applicable elsewhere).

On a personal note, I'm planning a move to Cambodia to work with women. It's my ideal next-stop after I'm finished in Afghanistan. I'd be grateful for any suggestions you might have.

I think I've posted this twice... somehow it didn't appear under "comments". Whoopsie!

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData