oDR

Tajikistan: Free Alexander Sodiqov!

On 16 June, Alexander Sodiqov, a political science PhD student at the University of Toronto, was arrested in Tajikistan while conducting research on conflict resolution.

 

David W. Montgomery
9 July 2014

The American Declaration of Independence is not merely an affirmation of United States sovereignty, but also an affirmation of ideals: ‘Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.’ In much of the Western world, these ideals are not viewed as exceptional, but basic civil liberties. They are instantiated in various international agreements, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and add legitimacy to the very idea of individual rights: ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression.’ But all too often, the opportunities these values afford are not evenly enjoyed.

On 16 June, Alexander Sodiqov, a political science PhD student at the University of Toronto, was arrested in Tajikistan while conducting research on conflict resolution. Sodiqov — a 31-year-old husband, father, and Tajik national — was part of a large multi-country research project on conflict management, and had conducted only one interview with a civil society leader before he was arrested. It is not known what prompted his arrest, but it appears to be due to his research activities and possibly to research analyses that he published previously.

 Like Sodiqov, as an academic researcher working in Central Asia, the purpose of my work has also been misconstrued by local authorities. While researching religion in 2005, for example, I had two assistants temporarily detained in Kyrgyzstan, and was myself detained in Uzbekistan. In both instances, detainment was a misunderstanding that, once clarified, led to immediate release, apologies, and invitations to share tea and a meal together. Sodiqov has yet to be released, and this is no doubt because he is a Tajik national, and does not have the same protections afforded a US national.

Academic solidarity

The arrest of a fellow academic researcher, however, is of great concern to all who conduct interview-based research. The magnitude of this concern is evident by some of the largest international professional academic organisations—representing nearly 72,000 constituent members--coming together to voice concern about Sodiqov’s ongoing detention. What happened to Sodiqov could happen to anyone who does research that ends up being perceived as threatening to the authorities, whoever those authorities may be.

The arrest of a fellow academic researcher, however, is of great concern to all who conduct interview-based research.

In terms of promoting open societies that lead to stability and opportunities for human potential to be realised, it is right to want local scholars like Sodiqov to be able to research and ask questions that could benefit their home countries. His research, which had been approved by a university ethics committee, was to collect public statements by government and civil society organisations, and to conduct interviews with public officials and civil society leaders. The research was expected to benefit Tajikistan by showing, in international scholarship, how Tajikistan developed practices of conflict resolution that extend back to the successful resolution of the civil war in 1997.

Beyond what the Sodiqov case represents to researchers, it embodies a threat to the very ideals of democracy and freedom so frequently celebrated in Western universities and Western societies. Tajikistan’s worrisome crackdown on academic freedom reflects a government seeking to control narratives of what could, in the end, advance a dynamic civic space. It is through education that the ideals of better futures are advanced; and it is with great concern that we should monitor how Tajikistan handles Sodiqov. Continuing to treat him as a threat to the state jeopardizes the ideals of academic inquiry, and the hope many young Tajiks studying abroad have to live in a place that supports intellectual curiosity alongside the pursuit of Happiness.

* Follow and support Alexander Sodiqov's case here

Can there be a green populist project on the Left?

Many on the Left want to return to a politics based on class, not populism. They point to Left populist parties not reaching their goals. But Chantal Mouffe argues that as the COVID-19 pandemic has put the need for protection from harm at the top of the agenda, a Left populist strategy is now more relevant than ever.

Is this an opportunity for a realignment around a green democratic transformation?

Join us for a free live discussion on Thursday 22 October, 5pm UK time/12pm EDT.

Hear from:

Paolo Gerbaudo Sociologist and political theorist, director of the Centre for Digital Culture at King’s College London and author of ‘The Mask and the Flag: Populism and Global Protest’ and ‘The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy’, and of the forthcoming ‘The Great Recoil: Politics After Populism and Pandemic’.

Chantal Mouffe Emeritus Professor of Political Theory at the University of Westminster in London. Her most recent books are ‘Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically’, ‘Podemos. In the Name of the People’ and ‘For a Left Populism’.

Spyros A. Sofos Researcher and research coordinator at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Lund University and author of ‘Nation and Identity in Contemporary Europe’, ‘Tormented by History’ and ‘Islam in Europe: Public Spaces and Civic Networks'.

Chair: Walid el Houri Researcher, journalist and filmmaker based between Berlin and Beirut. He is partnerships editor at openDemocracy and lead editor of its North Africa, West Asia project.

Get oDR emails A weekly roundup of political and social developments in the post-Soviet space. Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData