openDemocracyUK

Balls' speech to conference: little new, nothing bold

You might say the Shadow Chancellor had an easy job yesterday, persuading the Labour conference and the world outside that he is a better man than Osborne to hold the wheel of the sinking British economy. But while Balls may have succeeded in sounding credible, there was no big Labour vision for the future, and more than a flavour of Brown.

Robin Ramsay
2 October 2012
Ed-Balls-Labours-shadow-c-007.jpg

Ed Ball’s speech to Labour conference was an odd mixture. The Shadow Chancellor made sure to warn of "tough choices in the years ahead" and acknowledge that "under Labour there would have been cuts and that – on  spending, pay and pensions – there will be difficult decisions inthe future from which we will not flinch." We had the restatement of fundamental difference between Labour and the government, the dominant wing of which, led by Osborne and Cameron, seems unable to grasp that; "if more people are on the dole, not paying taxes, you can’t get the deficit down. If businesses are going  bust, not hiring new workers, you can’t get the deficit down. If the economy’s not growing, you can’t get the  deficit down." And we had a wish list: "a modern industrial policy to support long-term wealth creation, with strategic support for our advanced manufacturing and service industries" and "radical reform to separate retail and investment banking."

None of this would have raised dissent from Business Secretary Vince Cable; Balls was presumably appealing to him and his Lib Dem party when talking of "Building a consensus which crosses party lines, without chopping and changing one parliament to the next. A consensus to re-build Britain for the future." And we had a Brown-like nod towards the City with "fiscal responsibility in the national interest", which "puts the national interest first, just as we did over a decade ago when we made the Bank of England independent." (And look well how that turned out!)

None of which the mainstream national media took much notice of, concentrating instead on the tiny squeak of promised action: Labour would use £4 billion raised by the sale of the 4G mobile phone spectrum to build 100,000 houses over two years. In the midst of a deep and worsening recession, in the face of an enormous trade deficit and mass unemployment, all the Shadow Chancellor can think of is building 50,000 houses a year, when over 300,000 a year were being built in the 1950s and 60s... OK, it’s a conference speech and one of its key aims is to get a headline or two the next day. Even so, this is desperately thin stuff in the face of the crisis we now have. Is this really all there is?

Robin Ramsay’s  Well, how did we get here? A brief history of the British economy, minus the wishful thinking has just been published in Kindle format.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData