openDemocracyUK

Communities of resistance: resistance is not futile

Understanding how neo-liberalism can be challenged by common and reciprocal action.

Mike Aitken
23 February 2015

My essay looks at some of the activities undertaken by civil society and illustrates how these may be gradually co-opted by business practices. It considers this kaleidoscope of activities - including the work of community and voluntary organisations – as representing a ‘social commons’ that is under threat. At times civil society can offer resistance and alternatives to the current political orthodoxy, known as neo-liberalism, which is becoming pervasive around the world. This is an economic, political and cultural project that seeks to privatise public goods and common land, outsource welfare services and introduce competitiveness deeper into every aspect of our lives. It is operated by trade agreements, structures and terms of trade and governance. Citizenship and rights become challenged and conditional.

Even civil society activities are affected by neo-liberal mechanisms. The activities within civil society can resist but the spaces are becoming smaller. This essay argues that ‘resistance is not futile’ and provides examples of different activities in the UK. Activist practices including: community organising, reciprocal working, commoning and conviviality can build spaces for relationships and learning. They offer ways of doing and thinking differently. This essay points out that even here there are attempts at colonisation by the dominant regime and argues for a strong defence of the social commons.

You can read my essay on the TransNational Institute’s site here.

 

This article is part of the LocalismWatch series.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData