A failure of imagination: the TUC march and what should be done

A big Trade Union rally is taking place tomorrow - the 20th October. It is misconceived.

Anthony Barnett
Anthony Barnett
19 October 2012

Tomorrow, Saturday 20th October, the TUC will be leading a march against austerity and for "A Future that Works". I aim to join it, but with a strong feeling of pointlessness, that it is poorly conceived and will squander resources. I want to say why and say what should be done in the future.

Huge demonstrations can be transformative, obviously. Small ones can be exemplary and make an impact if they are well designed and express a passion that resonates. It’s less a matter of size than the creation and release of energy.

A march can be a good form of demonstration. Last year's there was a TUC march on 26 of March. It was very large, it brought new people into activity, it showed trade unionism's present-day face, more female, more working in public services, than the traditional industrial proletariat. I argued it was a limited failure, as was the ‘Black Bloc’ rioting that was parasitic on the day and the Fortnum’s sit-in by UKUncut, which got its message muddled. The TUC didn’t know what to do with those it had mobilised. 

Now, the demonstration is to be repeated. The aim of 20 October is to carry on 26 March. But what's the point when the argument about austerity has already moved on – it isn’t working and that’s official. Another march, another day. It isn’t new, it won’t be bigger unless I’m missing something. What’s the point?

Any kind of organisation or movement has to learn, to grow. It has to be a learning experience for those who participate and for its leaders. This is especially so now when, to leave aside everything else, we are facing the possibility of a second financial crash (if David Potter’s sober analysis is right). But the TUC is not responding to this. And if it isn't learning it will be shrinking. 

So this is what the TUC should be doing.

  1. It should stop ‘marching’ and start thinking.
  2. It should hire a large section of Hyde Park for two days, and fill it with tents of different kinds: tents for the NHS and the BBC, tents for think tanks and authors and the showing of video films. Tents for discussion of economic issues, of Europe, of trade unionism and of the City and business.
  3. I think of it as ‘Not the Village’ meaning not the village of Westminster, but it needs a good name.
  4. Similar gatherings should be encouraged across the country at the same time, with live web-links, so that the whole country starts to think for itself.
  5. We devise a way of counting everyone involved so that it also becomes a mobilisation of size, which lifts expectation as well as participation.

Now that would be a demonstration!  

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData