openDemocracyUK

Home Office snooping plans revived

Guy Aitchison
21 October 2010

Important news on the civil liberties front. It turns out that when the government promised they'd "end the storage of internet and email records without good reason" (the words of the Coalition Agreement) what they actually meant was "all your emails, phone calls and website visits will be recorded and stored". A subtle (but important) difference.

The Telegraph reports that buried in the Strategic Defence and Security Review is a move to revive plans to make communications providers store, for at least a year, details of all phone calls, emails, text messages and other electronic communications and surrender them to the authorities upon request.

The plans (originally part of the Intercept Modernisation Programme) had been shelved by the Labour government in December after intensive pressure from campaigners, but the Home Office is determined to breathe life back into them, and ministers are going along with it. The security review says:

"We will introduce a programme to preserve the ability of the security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies to obtain communication data and to intercept communications within the appropriate legal framework.

"This programme is required to keep up with changing technology and to maintain capabilities that are vital to the work these agencies do to protect the public.

"Communications data provides evidence in court to secure convictions of those engaged in activities that cause serious harm. It has played a role in every major Security Service counter terrorism operation and in 95 per cent of all serious organised crime investigations.

"We will legislate to put in place the necessary regulations and safeguards to ensure that our response to this technology challenge is compatible with the Government’s approach to information storage and civil liberties.

I argued back in June that the Coalition was already back-tracking on its commitment to civil liberties with its decision to plough ahead with the NHS Summary Care Record, whilst Henry Porter recently warned on OK that "we are still building the infrastructure for a potential police state without a care in the world". 

Freedom Bill or not it seems the government still views us as an inconvenience to be tagged, tracked and monitored. It is the mentality of Whitehall at work, the "deep state" as Anthony Barnett has referred to it, murky, power-hungry and unaccountable, with a deep-seated loathing for the public.

 

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Layla Moran Liberal Democrat MP (TBC)

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData