openDemocracyUK

Is Blair unhinged?

A response to Alex Holland's analysis of Tony Blair's testimony to the Iraq Inquiry
Stuart Weir
2 February 2010

An OurKingdom conversation [history: Alex Holland > this post]

Alex Holland does Blair an undeserved compliment by analysing his fantastical performance before Chilcot so scrupulously. My own response after sitting through the full six hours was that hubris has entirely taken Blair over and of rage that he regards the whole tragic and shameful enterprise of the invasion of Iraq as his own personal crusade, give or take a mate or two. He raised his own 'belief' and ability to take 'decisions' above any other political, factual or moral consideration, allowing only that others may have had different views, but so what! I don't believe any of it, least of all his ridiculous tan.

The man is surely unhinged. His actions have already contributed to humanitarian disaster and huge political instability in the world, a sharpening of lethal anger among a minority of Muslims and a continuing, brutal and illegal over-reaction among western nations, both internationally and domestically, but he wants to make it worse by taking on Iran. And he exhibited not the slightest sense of regret for the victims in the invasion or for the wider consequences of war itself. In his coarse language, he and our military leaders were 'up for it'!

Just think. This is the man who is a peace envoy in the middle east. This is the man whom our Prime Minister, honestly or not, felt was 'up for' being the new president of the EU. Forget trying to have him put on trial for war crimes. That is beyond our reach. But let's at least seek to make those who still hold him in this absurd regard think again. He should be removed from his post as envoy. And while we are about it, we could make it clear to Brown that the idea that he should be part of the Labour party's election campaign is both stupid and repugnant to a degree that would stain the party's hopes for the future.

 

Who's getting rich from COVID-19?

Boris Johnson's government stands accused of 'COVID cronyism', after handing out staggering sums of money to controversial private firms to fight COVID-19. Often the terms of these deals are kept secret, with no value-for-money checks or penalties for repeated failures which cost lives. And many major contracts have gone directly to key Tory donors and allies – without competition.

As COVID rates across the country surge, how can we hold our leaders accountable? Meet the lawyers, journalists and politicians leading the charge in our free live discussion on Thursday 1 October at 5pm UK time.

Hear from:

Dawn Butler Labour MP for Brent Central and member of the House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology

Peter Geoghegan Investigations editor, openDemocracy, and author of 'Democracy for Sale: Dark Money and Dirty Politics'

Jolyon Maugham Barrister and founder of the Good Law Project.

Peter Smith Procurement expert and author of 'Bad Buying: How Organisations Waste Billions through Failures, Frauds and F*ck-ups'

Chair: Mary Fitzgerald Editor-in-chief of openDemocracy

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData