openDemocracyUK

It's Only a Game: 'Team GB', football and the nature of the UK

Will there be a GB football team at the 2012 Olympics? The dispute over forming such a team is more than a quandary for the sport: it exposes the nature of the ill-fated project of ‘Great Britishness’
Gerry Hassan
22 June 2011

The story of the ‘Team GB’ football project entering next year’s Olympics has been rumbling on for a few years. Some people will think this is a sideshow and only about the game of football, but instead it goes to the heart of the UK, who runs it, and how it is seen internationally.

HassanFootball.jpg

England flag made of supporters. Image: Carey Baird

Yesterday, ‘Team GB’s’ role in the 2012 London Olympics was lauded by the British Olympic Association’s (BOA) with a claim of a ‘Historic Agreement Reached to Enable Team GB to Return to The Olympic Football Pitch’. The "agreement" which this claimed was between the FA and the other national football authorities. The claim was immediately and fiercely denounced in a joint statement by the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish football authorities who said they had “collective opposition to Team GB participation at the 2012 Olympic Games”.

What is going on can be judged at a footballing level, and at a much wider and significant level. The BOA’s declaration of a ‘historic agreement’ was nothing of the kind. Instead, it was a blatant, transparent attempt to try to appeal to Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish players above the heads of their national associations. In this it was nothing short of dishonest, calculating and counter-productive.

The UK has four separate football associations – an anomaly in world football and FIFA, where otherwise each independent state is represented, that goies back to when the Football Association in 1863 and Scottish Football Association in 1873 became the first national associations in the world.

There is an English exceptionalism in all of this. They have chosen to take at face value the soft words of FIFA that a ‘Team GB’ won’t affect the four home nations’ independence. What the English have failed to note is that ultimately a ‘Team GB’ isn’t just a threat to the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish status, but the English too. It still seems rather peculiar that the English miss this obvious fact: that their own self-interest could be undermined by FIFA and international precedent. This despite Sepp Blatter and everything that has happened in the World Cup bid process!

There once was a Great Britain football team. It took part in the 1908 and 1912 Olympic Games winning both of them, although the 1908 London Games team was the English national amateur football team and also the Great Britain team; such were the days. They didn’t compete in the Olympics again until the 1948 London Games, last playing in the finals in Rome in 1960, and playing their last match in 1971 losing 5-0 to Bulgaria.

Once a team Great Britain played two friendly matches against the Rest of Europe in 1947 at Hampden and 1955 in Belfast. The first was held to celebrate the return of the four nations to FIFA in 1946 – and contained 5 English, 3 Scots, 2 Welsh and 1 Northern Irish players in the blue of Scotland and winning 6-1. This in front of 135,000 spectators and gate receipts of £35,000, which were giving to FIFA!

How times have changed. The ‘Team GB’ football project cannot be seen in isolation and just about football, even in an age where the game has become a substitute for so many emotions of ‘collective joy’. Gordon Brown said after the 2008 Beijing Olympics that “the British public would find it strange if there was no British team”. This provoked Alex Salmond to respond that Brown “must be seriously out of touch with Scotland” to support such an idea.

What Brown’s comments illustrate is that the whole ‘Team GB’ project is part of the bigger, ambitious and ill-fated project of ‘Great Britishness’ and late nation building. This is about trying to weave together a collective story and project of Britishness, on the football field, in sport, culture, and public life, and it is just too late for it. That doesn’t mean the breakup of Britain follows automatically, but that such cack-handed enterprises are doomed to fail.

There does seem to be under the Cameroon Conservative coalition a deliberate and conscious attempt to brand as British such moments and events as the Royal Wedding, next year’s Olympics and the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee. This is the late Britishness project and running through it is a fear of letting England and Englishness emerge, become active and conscious, and name and realise itself.

This is a futile and pointless politics which the farce of ‘Team GB’ reveals; annoying the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish, but at the same time continuing English exceptionalism and the silencing of the majority nation and people of these isles. It can’t and won’t continue, instead as PJ Harvey sang, ‘Let England Shake’.

Trade deals, Brexit and disaster capitalism

If you're tired of Brexit, you ain't seen nothing yet.

Is the UK joining Trumpland? Does this explain Boris Johnson's kamikaze EU negotiating strategy? And could beating this deal begin a challenge to the iniquities of the global economy?

Join us for a free live discussion at 5pm UK time, 24 September

In conversation:

Nick Dearden Director of Global Justice Now and author of 'Trade Secrets: The Truth about the US Trade Deal and How We Can Stop It'

Caroline Molloy Editor of openDemocracyUK and ourNHS

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData