Jack's the lad

Jack Straw boasts that he could have stopped Britain taking part in the Iraq war
Stuart Weir
19 February 2010

Jack Straw boasts that he could have stopped Britain taking part in the Iraq war, talking to Michael Cockerell in his documentary on the Foreign Office, one of his "Great Offices of State" series on BBC4, broadcast on Thursday. The obvious response is, why the hell didn't you then? But Straw's statement raises other pretty profound questions of the kind that our media never ask.

Straw is of course right. Had he resigned as Foreign Secretary and explained why in the House of Commons he would have stopped Blair's enterprise in its tracks and Britain would not have the stain of an illegal war and countless lost and maimed lives on its conscience. Lord Goldsmith could equally have prevented Blair going to war, as could the rest of the cabinet. That's the way of it in our constitutional system. In the absence of a written constitution, the checks and balances on executive action are ultimately political - and depend on politicians (and perhaps civil servants) acting individually or collectively to prevent or modify poor or reckless government decisions.

This check on the executive doesn't work for well-known reasons and can even be evaded by a ruthless Prime Minister and his or her cronies in power, as has been the case throughout my life-time (e.g., Attlee's secret decision to build the atom bomb, Eden's plot with Selwyn Lloyd to invade Egypt with the French and Israelis).

A halfway decent written constitution could in my view have prevented both Blair and Eden from pitching this country into damaging and immoral wars, as well as preventing many lesser, but serious, "policy disasters". Meanwhile, what about some humility? Let's not talk about "Great Offices of State" any more?

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData