A job seeker sets himself on fire: how will Cameron respond?

An unemployed man set himself alight outside a job centre in Birmingham this morning, allegedly over a claim. This, days after the Prime Minister prepared Britain for more welfare cuts with a speech denouncing our 'something for nothing' culture. So what is the job seeker owed, if anything? What would Cameron say?  

Niki Seth-Smith
29 June 2012

This morning, a job seeker set himself alight outside a Birmingham job centre, allegedly after a row over his benefit payments. He tied himself to the railings of the Selly Oak JobCentre Plus, doused himself with flammable liquid, and set himself on fire. He is forty-eight years old. He survived, after suffering burns to his lower legs.  

Had the man been refused benefits? An onlooker said it was over a payment not received.  It is hard to think what other scenario could have resulted in such desperation. If this is the case, what will our Prime Minister say (if anything)? Will he speak of a "culture of entitlement", as he did in his speech on Monday preparing the country for even further welfare cuts? Perhaps this man did feel he was "owed something" by the state. Self-immolation is as clear a shout out to the world as you can get. This is the pain I am suffering. Watch as I suffer. In public. On the street outside a job centre. 

But the purpose of Cameron's speech this week was to lower the bar still further of how much it is felt that people in Britain are "owed". Not reasonable hours at work ("Tough, that's just life", says Cameron). Not a home of their own ("Tough, live with your parents"). Not the ability to choose when to start a family ("Tough, save up"). The Prime Minister's definition of giving appears to be "in work", and so those shut out of the beleaguered job market cannot expect a basic level of dignity and security from the state.  

His speech this week, while meatless in terms of policy, is significant in signalling the Coalition's future direction on welfare reform. If the government goes ahead as planned, there is no doubt that will see a rise in extreme acts of desperation from benefit-seekers up and down the country. (See here for a comparison of the rise in suicide rates in austerity Greece to the situation in Britain, responding to the suicide pact of two British benefit-seekers in 2011).  The Coalition are aware of this, and are making preparations: guidelines have already been sent out by the DWP to jobcentre staff on how to deal with suicide threats from claimants, instructing them in particular on how to discern between a customer who genuinely "intends to self-harm or kill themselves" and a 'fake' (see here for more on the 'six-point plan' sent out in April of last year). 

OurKingdom has published three pieces in response to Cameron's welfare speech and its implications, from policy expert Nick Pearce (see here), democracy campaigner and author of Unequal Britain Stuart Weir (here) and Deborah Padfield, a Citizens Advice Bureau worker who deals directly with claimants (see here). We have also re-published Mark Serwotka's powerful piece on the institutional humilitations facing claimants.  

The full story of this morning's saddening incident is yet to come out, but Selly Oak MP Steve McCabe was right to say that whatever the details of the individual case, "the bigger thing is that we need to try to understand what is happening with unemployment at the moment". I would add to that: this should be a wake-up call on where we are heading as a country, and how much we now believe the people of Britain "deserve". 

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData