openDemocracyUK

MPs' attitudes to the English question

Guy Lodge
3 February 2010

A letter from Guy Lodge of IPPR...

I just wanted to draw your attention to a paper IPPR has published which reports the findings of a survey we have conducted exploring MPs' attitudes towards the English Question.

The main findings are:

  • There is little support among MPs for the status quo - just 10% back this, the lowest any option received (more - 11% - supported an English Parliament)
  • However, while there is a clear mandate for reform, opinion is divided over what to do. Tory MPs strongly support English votes on Eng laws, whereas (unsurprisingly) Labour strongly oppose such a move.
  • The one area where there is cross-party support concerns finance, where 62% of MPs claimed the distribution of money between the nations is unfair.
  • It is Tory MPs who are most agitated by these issues: 72% believe that England has lost out since devolution to Scotland and Wales, and so we argued that Cameron will come under pressure to answer the English Question if elected.

The report can be found at the IPPR website, and the Telegraph has published a short op ed we did.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData