Claire Rayner: queen of British republicans

A personal tribute to Claire Rayner, the 'agony aunt', novelist and broadcaster who died this week.
Anthony Barnett
Anthony Barnett
16 October 2010

I met Claire Rayner when she became a founder supporter of Charter 88, one of its early spokespeople and helped launch its Democracy Day with Ian McEwan during the 1992 General Election. What I really liked about her was her fearless, unpretentious desire for people to be well: this meant to be themselves and as honest with others as possible. Obviously, this had to include the way we run things, which is part of our relationship with others – our self-government.

This defiance of the upper class and expert view that ordinary people are not concerned with how we are governed was conscious and deliberate. Not that she was ordinary. But she worked hard to see things from the point of view of the woman in the street. Doing so with a great laugh behind which one could also feel the love, pain and effort that went into what she achieved. 


"Of course" (I can hear her voice) we should have an honest electoral system, not be ruled in any way by Lords and write down our constitution. This wasn’t a naïve view. Claire understood very well what we are up against. Hers was a healthy approach, while the system of vested interests that messes up people’s lives and politics remains seriously unwell.

She was as good as you could hope to be. It meant she came to represent what we should all be like. Everyone could feel it, whether they agreed with her views or not, which is what made her so popular. Republican as she was, I hope she took pleasure in the thought that there was no one more fully qualified to be our Queen.

An edited version of these reflections on Claire Rayner's involvement in Charter 88 featured in the obituary pages of the Guardian

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData