From where I stand – fifty-something former journalist,
reasonably successful small businessman and in that capacity, therefore (so
we’re often told) someone to emulate - that there’s widespread rumbling
discontent in Britain
isn’t open to question. From customers to acquaintances, friends to social
media feeds, unhappiness is hard to escape.
That the BBC’s main current affairs programme, Newsnight, had Jeremy Paxman
interviewing a de facto voice of a younger generation, Russell Brand, on
revolution is as good as any a reflection of this. Channel Four’s Paul Mason summarised
what went on in his blog. And as the Paxman-Brand exchange demonstrated, and
Mason’s article in effect emphasised, our mainstream political parties are
irrelevant in all this. They didn’t and don’t arise as a potential source of
solutions.
A part of the rot that’s so badly infected the current system lies in safe
seats and the very real – not perceived - futility of voting for many. The
first-past-the-post system undermines any legitimacy based on the actual
intentions of the electorate (how many MPs represent the majority of the
eligible electorate in their constituencies?). No-one can decry those who opt
not to vote while so many votes can only be cast in pointless contexts. No-one
would decry not voting if a non-vote counted as a vote against all the
available candidates.
State funding of parties – rather than funding by donors, the rich, interest
groups, lobbyists and their ilk – may be a viable way forward. Possibly, that
funding could be linked to party membership numbers.
There are options out there, and this digital age affords myriad new ways to
involve and engage voters. However, first we need to overcome the barriers to
change.
If They’re Not Solutions …
A growing number of people, given voice by Brand, are opting to ignore
‘regular’ politics. I saw Brand live at the BIC after the Paxman interview –
the cheer in support of him when he raised the meeting was one of the loudest
of the evening.
It is not the case that his audience is apolitical – it’s that they have no
faith in the politics on offer, and are right to feel that way. If you’re
hankering for change then whatever the nominal political ideologies on offer
may be, theory pales into insignificance when you’re on a zero-hours contract,
or struggling to pay the heating bills and believe your kids are going to have
a worse life than yours. You want action, and the political parties don’t
deliver.
However, while notions of ‘left’ and ‘right’ as meaningful opposing forces in Britain are
dead, they persist as dangerous hangovers. If you’re not part of the
solution, you’re part of the problem.
Both Of Them?
In the script we’ve been working to for decades, Conservatives stand for the
establishment, the status quo, with Labour the opposition. The appointment
of Simon Stevens as the head of NHS England serves to neatly demonstrate just
how false these notions of establishment/opposition or ‘right’/’left’ are.
The NHS is perhaps the most valued aspect of British life in the popular
psyche. Notionally, the Tory Party is all about undermining the NHS, all about
privatizing it. Notionally, Labour is supposed to be all about defending
it.
From 2001-4 Mr Stevens worked for Labour, during which time he was a strong
advocate of increasing the use of the private sector in the NHS. Now, the
Tories have appointed him head of NHS England. Enough said. Let’s stop
here. Rather than fool around debating it we need to close this chapter in our
political history and move on.
(The Liberal Democrats, with an inadequate power base, will cosy-up to whoever
will best serve their long-frustrated craving for power. Thus, they have destroyed
any credibility they may have had as proponents of a different
ideology. They are a footnote in the chapter in British politics that is
ending.)
Why Now
Arguably, the British (or any) establishment was ever thus. What has
changed is that the establishment has become increasingly myopic in its
understanding of what constitutes its interests. In simple terms: you can keep
a population docile (and successfully feed off them) as long as you ensure the
significant majority of that population receive enough to feel things are
improving. As the concentration of wealth into the hands of the very few
has massively accelerated in recent years, so those ‘crumbs from the top table’
have become ever more scarce. The establishment has become too stupid and
too greedy for its own good.
We are on a cusp. There is widespread disaffection and there are many millions
of people who know their living standards are falling and that coming
generations face a bleak future. What isn’t clearly understood, yet, is
that none of our current political parties represent a positive option for
change.
So, Let’s Move On
If we want to move on, we need to recognize the obstacles that have to be
overcome. Attitudes need to change radically: everyone normally thought
of as middle or lower class needs to fully comprehend that the political
parties they have historically voted for have come to represent one broad
ruling establishment, and that the establishment is concerned with the
interests of the establishment, and little else.
That will be a difficult and bitter pill to swallow. Perhaps thankfully, the
parties themselves - by their crass failures and obvious betrayals of their
roots and supporters - are providing the sugar coating.
Not Just The Parties
Obviously, the broad establishment’s interests are only represented in part by
the political parties themselves. It also enjoys direct representation through
the mainstream media in all its guises. Consume any of it and you will be very
hard pressed to find even an occasional, timid challenge to the bedrock of the
status quo.
Boats may be rocked a little – MPs’ expenses for example – but whatever the
noises they make, the mainstream media is also defined by notions of ‘left’ and
‘right’ and hence by their relationship to the political parties. As such, at
root the mainstream media are similarly all primarily concerned with the
preservation of the status quo – of the broad establishment that sits across
and subverts the interests of the nation for its own ends. When you witness any
boats being rocked, you’re witnessing minor spats within the establishment.
Know Your Enemy
There will be many who would want to dismiss calls for radical change or
revolution as heresy or lunacy or mere celebrity babbling. Listen closely: all
the critics are really arguing for is the status quo, from the viewpoint of the
status quo.
Bear in mind it’s not just the rich and powerful, those in the ‘traditional’
establishment, who want to keep things as they are. There are plenty of
lower-paid, lower profile folk who depend on and are defined by ‘left’ and
‘right’ for their pay and status. There are the journalists, the party workers
and the academics, the quango staffers and civil servants, the charity
executives and union reps and so on.
Judge any comments and commentators by their relationship to the existing
‘left’ / ‘right’ norm: if it’s anything other than outright opposition, they
are more than likely going to be part of the problem.
Know Your Enemy’s Tactics
The digital era is, independently of any disillusionment with politics,
bringing about a rapid waning in the reach and power of the existing mainstream
media. The media barons of old have largely failed to dominate new media
channels.
That waning, the questioning of the politics of ‘left’ and ‘right’ and the
values of the broad establishment, the undermining of old certainties – that
all combines to mean we can expect a lot of voices attempting to fight change.
The fight against change will be loud, long, dirty and dismaying.
Dismaying? Yes, dismaying, for what it says about human greed and selfishness.
Research into how tobacco companies behaved despite knowledge about lung
cancer; research into how people with fortunes tied up in
climate-change-creating industries orchestrate and fund bogus, specious
arguments against doing anything to ameliorate coming climate-change-generated
disasters, and you’ll understand how low humans are willing to sink.
And If We Don’t Act?
If we want to imagine a future politics that is still democratic, then once
we’ve understood the meaninglessness of our existing system’s token ideologies,
we need to move on to a new chapter, with new political parties and new media
channels – with a new legitimacy. We need to start work now, on creating a new,
participative, representative democracy that reflects the needs of the people.
If nothing changes, the current system will break. Sooner or later, a tipping
point of too many people experiencing real hardship will be reached. Quite
possibly it will break in an unmanaged, unpredictable way. That is something we
should all work to try and avoid.
While some may call for revolution, a very large majority of the people of Britain, as
disaffected as they may be, aren’t calling for a revolution in the sense of
rioting, bloodshed and lawlessness. The system may be rotten, but it is better
than anarchy – at least at the moment.
Besides, unless we’re able to change human nature overnight, history strongly
suggests violent revolutions, even if momentarily popular, create just as much
misery for the ordinary citizens as whatever system the revolt was
overthrowing.
Democracy, when it works as the word ‘democracy’ actually means, is the best
system humanity has come up with for government. Just as no-one should
criticise anyone who doesn’t vote while so many votes are pointless, so we
shouldn’t reject voting per se.
What we should be fighting for is meaningful voting – and it would be
revolutionary if we achieve it.
A Perfect Epilogue
In a perfect epilogue to this chapter of British political life, Jeremy Paxman,
the man who criticised Russell Brand for not voting, subsequently admitted (in
a Radio Times interview) that he too has not voted, has described our political
parties as “unappetising” and observed that “People are sick of the tawdry
pretences.” That may in itself be a small but revolutionary step forwards.
If you liked this piece, you can sign up for OurKingdom's weekly update here, join our Facebook here or follow us on Twitter here.
Read more
Get our weekly email
Comments
We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.