The Sun trials - Thursday 1st October 2015 - when did Pharo learn who the source was?

"The full truth is that both of you knew full well that this was a serving police officer?"

Martin Hickman
1 October 2015

Chris Pharo (top left) is accused of aiding and abetting misconduct in a public office between 2002 and 2011. Credit: Youtube.

The Sun's head of news, Chris Pharo, only learnt a senior reporter had been paying a police officer when he was arrested, he told his trial today.

Giving evidence at the Old Bailey, Mr Pharo said the Thames Valley reporter Jamie Pyatt and other journalists never identified their sources to him.

The court has heard that Mr Pharo received emails from Mr Pyatt requesting cash payments of thousands of pounds subsequently made to a Surrey police officer.

Asked when he first learnt that Mr Pyatt's source, Officer 2044, was a serving police officer, Mr Pharo said he wasn't exactly sure, but it was "after I was arrested"

Entering the witness box for the third day, the Sun's Assistant Editor (News) insisted his role in the payment system was limited to "valuing" stories for which payments was sought. He then passing the requests up the line for authorisation.

Asked how it felt to have known that he played a role in the payments to Officer 2044, Mr Pyatt told Court 13: "I was shocked..."

Cross-examining, prosecutor Julian Christopher QC took the executive through a series of Mr Pyatt's emails asking for cash payments for his police source.

Asked what he would have made of the request for £500, Mr Pharo told the Old Bailey: "I wouldn't necessarily have taken it at face value. It wasn't my job to police the Sun newsroom."

He added: "I don't recall reading this email."

Another time Mr Pyatt requested a cash payment for a story about the glamour model Jordan's (now Katie Price's) boyfriend being arrested for drink-driving, telling Mr Pharo: "He [the source] gave me every cough and spit from the arrest."

"That's plainly a police officer, isn't it?", Mr Christopher suggested, to which Mr Pharo replied: "I disagree."

He said Jordan's entourage was "notoriously leaky".

When Mr Christoher pointed out that Mr Pyatt had said his source had "screened" the details, Mr Pharo said many people used computers.

Mr Christopher demanded: "The full truth is that both of you knew full well that this was a serving police officer?"

Mr Pharo replied: "That's not true."

He explained there were "a multitude of reasons" why contacts wanted to be paid in cash. 

Asked whether paying a police officer to break the rules would have caused him "any concern," Mr Pharo replied: "It wasn't my job to police the Sun newsroom. It wasn't my job to pull people up on things like this."

He said he did not believe journalists who claimed that they were seeking cash payments for "a cop" or "a serving police officer" or a "Chelsea copper" were actually paying police officers.

Mr Pharo, who ended his evidence at 1pm, had stayed silent at his police interview in 2012 on the advice of his lawyer.

He and Mr Pyatt deny aiding and abetting misconduct in a public office between 2002 and 2011. The case continues.


See openDemocracyUK's full series on the Sun trials here.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData