How Theresa May is getting around election spending limits with big newspaper ads

By running local newspaper ads focusing on her message, Theresa May is getting around local spending limits for the upcoming general election

Sunny cropped.jpg
Sunny Hundal
5 May 2017

Twitter/Barry Whittleton. Some rights reserved.You could call it a trial run for an avalanche of media bombardment.

In 14 different areas across the country this week, the Tories have been running local newspaper ads that cover the entire front page, promoting May's message.

The four-page wraparound adverts were carried in local newspapers, focusing entirely on her leadership and message on Brexit. They are a sign of what is about to be unleashed.

Here's one example. And another one.

The Tories: literally buying themselves positive newspaper front pages. #Exeter

— Richard Nelson (@badblokebob) May 4, 2017


It smells fishy but such ads are considered perfectly legal under rules set out by the Electoral Commission.

While local candidates have a maximum spending limit over the course of the campaign, by focusing on May, which in itself is unusual for a General Election, the spending is classified under national campaign spending.

And that can be as high as £19 million over the course of an election campaign. Some think this is unethical and the rules need to be changed.

Being able to buy big ads in target constituencies without being constrained by local spending limits was a "massive flaw," Philip Cowley, professor of politics at Queen Mary University of London, told Buzzfeed News.

These rules of course benefit the party with the most money.

With the Conservatives already under scrutiny over their election spending in the 2015 election, this brazen attempt at ignoring local spending limits will raise more hackles.

But in her bid to win in the General Election, Theresa May is showing no such qualms yet.


Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData