David Miliband's repeated advocacy of a reset referendum, including fixed election dates, could provide a foundational moment for a full constitutional settlement.
There was little sense of a potential leader setting out a case or being foundational. It was friendly and polite. No one asked about covering up our complicty in torture. There were classic Miliband phrases that catch the vapours of our time:
we will not restore trust in politics unless we bring the public into the decision making tent at local as well as national level
We should start with the assumption that the individual should have power, but never forget that government needs to have enough power to stop the individual being overpowered.
As knockabout with the Tories it wasn't bad. But I questioned the premise of this kind of exercise, which assumes we are facing a 'normal' election in a two party system - whereas the issue of the day is that voters despise both parties, see the system as a racket, and it is this that needs to be addressed. His call for a "Reset Referendum", a term I'd not heard before, suggested that the country faced a software problem whereas the public, rightly, are fed up with the hardware.
The Foreign Secretary was generous enough to reply "I'm with you 90 per cent of the way". He just did not accept the term "racket" was appropriate. Otherwise he agreed that there were huge problems with our Victorian institutions like parliament and announced that, "We are a third of the way through a revolution".
Which is interesting. What is the revolution? What are the other two-thirds going to be like? Will they take twenty-six more years of Labour government?
Questions for another day. There was a distinctly unrevolutionary answer to the reporter from Sky who asked about the Falklands, now the whole of Latin America objects to the UK exploring for oil in the South Atlantic. Miliband's reply (see video here) was classic, unimaginative Foreign Office intransigence. You could hear bones breaking. This is how he got sucked into covering up what happened to Binyam Mohamed. Just imagine, he could have reached an agreement for joint exploration to public acclaim.
This year’s COP26 meeting in Glasgow has been hailed as the most significant climate event since the 2015 Paris Agreement. But what action must world leaders take to put the planet on a sustainable path? And what does this mean for the future of global capitalism?
Join us for a free live discussion on Thursday 15 July at 5pm UK time/12pm EDT
URL copied to clipboard
Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy?Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why?Sign up here to find out.