openDemocracyUK

When will Britain's political parties talk seriously about education?

There has barely been a debate this election on how we can improve schools in this country. Why?

Sam Brunner
7 June 2017
school.jpg

A school building. Flickr/Alan Levine. Some rights reservedEducation, education, education. As a teacher, I'm listening hard for manifesto pledges that will make a difference when votes are cast tomorrow, but, as each rolls in, there is still not enough real debate of how we want to improve schools in this country. Where will we be in 2021?

I don't want to sound too miserable, but if tomorrow brings a Tory government with a workable majority, as seems most likely, the answer seems to be ‘more of the same’. Perhaps this explains why 75% of teachers in a recent TES survey said that they didn't think education would improve post-election.

If May is re-elected, I'm expecting the same grammar school debate that completely misses the point. May’s government may put a bit more money in, but it won't be enough. Technology and mental health interventions are on the agenda, which is positive, but outcomes are unpredictable. In the meantime, the new Conservative Secretary of State for Education is likely to be ‘Gove Lite’ and can be expected to keep on mucking about with free schools and academies, things which distract from the problems being faced in classrooms across the country and don't really make any tangible and whole-scale difference anyway.

What if Labour or a Labour-led coalition make it tomorrow? Despite the narrowing polls, the possibility seems remote, but there are some big promises for schools on Corbyn’s agenda, and polls suggest he has 65% of the teacher vote, up from 51% in 2015. He has pledged to reverse the £3 billion of savings that must be made by 2019-20, to halt the government proposed national funding formulas which hit the most needy schools in the poorest areas, lift public sector pay freezes and reduce class sizes. All excellent news, though questions remain over funding, but a Labour-SNP deal might be a force for positive change in the classroom.

We are asking teachers, who have had wages freezed for most of the past decade, to work a seven-day week

It's frustrating, though, to note an absence of any real discussion on any side about the practicalities of education, and educating. Where is the pledge that will address the crisis in teacher supply and retention in this country? The UK is a complete anomaly in terms of teacher retention in the developed world, but no one is really talking about it.

If no education system can be better than its teachers, but fewer than half of the teachers in our schools have more than 10 years experience, how and when will things improve?

Talis research found that teachers spend two days a week planning and marking. On top of a five day teaching week, we are asking teachers, who have had a wage freeze for most of the past decade, to work a seven-day week.

The real issue is how to attract people to the profession and how to keep them there, how to reduce workload and how to make it manageable. This must involve reconsideration of the accountability system – involving the way measure school success – and an overhaul of the inspection system.

Finally, it involves dealing with quality of lives: both teacher and pupil mental health are in crisis, not least due to the repercussions of the Gove-Morgan regime, an examination-based ideology gone mad.

We won't stop hearing about education anytime soon, no matter what happens tomorrow. But it's time to shift the focus to a system which prioritises the experience of education – both for teachers and pupils. None of us want to see classrooms crammed with even more pupils and empty of teachers in 2021. Let's start talking about that.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData