Who will count when we vote next time?

Anthony Barnett
Anthony Barnett
25 June 2010

As some of us wonder when we will start to gear up for a referendum on the voting system, with the Coalition still unable to tell us its proposed date, the arguments over the re-drawing of constituencies still need to take place. An important and helpful analysis on Political Betting  examines what could happen if the number of constituences is reduced to 585 and they are all created equal. This would mean constituencies with 78,000 each. Here is one consequence:

The effect of reducing the number of seats by 65 is especially dramatic to the Home Countries: Wales reduces a lot - 11 or 28% of their seats would go [40 to 29] on a slavish following of the equal size rules. Scotland would lose 9 or 16% [59 to 50], Northern Ireland 3 or 17% [18 to 15] with England reducing 41 seats, but only 8% [533 to 492]. And within England, the North East and the West Midlands will lose 4 [14%] and 7 [11%] of their seats respectively, the proportionately hardest hit areas.

But would it really deliver constituencies of equal sizes? There was an exchange about this between David Lammy and Nick Clegg in the Commons on Monday. MPs represent everyone who lives in their constituency even if they are not on the electoral register. If the register is taken as the measure of population size, who gains?

Labour should never have allowed the current, utterly imbalanced and undemocratic state of affairs to develop. It gave them a hugely improper disadvantage. But does one form of gerrymandering deserve another? The Lib Dems should beware here, especially if they want to stand for a clean break and honest politics....

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Who is bankrolling Britain's democracy? Which groups shape the stories we see in the press; which voices are silenced, and why? Sign up here to find out.


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData