NHS IT boss Kelsey wrongly claims care.data leaflet sent to 100% of homes

Tim Kelsey just keeps getting it wrong.

Jane Fae
19 February 2014

Confidence in NHS England’s commitment to transparency and openness received another blow this morning as a full and frank explanation of yesterday's events by NHS IT Director Tim Kelsey made two more inaccurate and misleading statements about the care.data leafleting process.

Mr Kelsey was appearing on BBC’s Breakfast programme to answer questions about why NHS England were putting back care.data by a further six months.

Questioned about low awareness of the recent information leaflet, he first told interviewers that “ very large number of people do know what's going on". Yet recent polls suggest that 80% of GP’s do not feel sufficiently informed, and 67% of patients do not recall receiving a leaflet.

He then added: "We contracted with the royal mail to ensure that 100% of households received a leaflet."

According to a spokesperson for the Royal Mail, this is inaccurate on two counts. NHS England contracted with an intermediary company, who then sub-contracted the task to  the Royal Mail.

More importantly households can opt out of receiving unaddressed mail. This means a doordrop of the kind undertaken on behalf of NHS England will only be delivered to 100% of households “in exceptional circumstances”.

The care.data information campaign was not one of them, the Royal Mail confirmed this morning.  

They added that the opt-out at present covers only a very small proportion of households.  Nonetheless, it was not delivered to 100% of households – unless the Royal Mail is operating a special scheme designed specifically to get round its own opt-out procedures.

We have asked NHS England to comment on the above, but so far have not heard back from them.


Like this piece? Please donate to OurNHS here to help keep us producing the NHS stories that matter. Thank you.

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals

To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.

By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email


We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData