ourNHS

Privacy campaigners team up with leading public health professor to fix Hunt's 'complete nonsense' on care.data

Hunt's fix for the troubled 'care.data' project - debated by MPs today - is "complete nonsense" according to medConfidential. They have teamed up with public health professor Allyson Pollock to propose an alternative fix to the troubled care.data project.

Caroline Molloy
11 March 2014

Health privacy campaigners medConfidential have teamed up with leading public health professional and privatisation critic Professor Allyson Pollock to draft an amendment to the Care Bill that would - they say - protect both vital research data and proper privacy safeguards.

Campaigners suggest the amendment buys time by bringing the controversial Health & Social Care Information Centre back under Parliamentary control til the legal provisions can be properly sorted out.

Last week the government gave assurances that they would - through the Care Bill currently before parliament - create ‘legal bars’ to the sale of medical records for commercial purposes.

But yesterday Phil Booth of medConfidential told OurNHS that the government amendments were “just not sufficient and in some cases complete nonsense”.

He added, “The knee-jerk amendments the government has laid they are so poorly drafted, they both threaten legitimate research and actually throw our health data open to exploitation by pretty much anyone.” 

Public health professionals like Pollock are concerned that without safeguards like parliamentary control of care.data, public confidence in the confidentiality of their personal medical information will be so undermined that many will opt out, damaging the ability of health professionals to use data for genuinely beneficial research.  

Pollock commented: “Our systems of public data have been carefully built up over centuries and the government is wantonly destroying both the systems and the public trust and faith in them. It is essential that these be protected and trust restored so that the health of the population can be properly monitored and promoted.”

She added “Enormous cuts are being made to the Office of National Statistics, with millions diverted to HSCIC spending it on Care.data misinformation and leaflets. The Census is also threatened. All the building blocks of public health and universal health care are being demolished.”

 

If the amendment is not taken today - in what is expected to be a stormy afternoon in parliament - Lord David Owen has indicated he is ready to lay the amendment when the Care Bill returns for final amendments in the Lords, as it is expected to later this month.  

Stop the secrecy: Publish the NHS COVID data deals


To: Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

We’re calling on you to immediately release details of the secret NHS data deals struck with private companies, to deliver the NHS COVID-19 datastore.

We, the public, deserve to know exactly how our personal information has been traded in this ‘unprecedented’ deal with US tech giants like Google, and firms linked to Donald Trump (Palantir) and Vote Leave (Faculty AI).

The COVID-19 datastore will hold private, personal information about every single one of us who relies on the NHS. We don’t want our personal data falling into the wrong hands.

And we don’t want private companies – many with poor reputations for protecting privacy – using it for their own commercial purposes, or to undermine the NHS.

The datastore could be an important tool in tackling the pandemic. But for it to be a success, the public has to be able to trust it.

Today, we urgently call on you to publish all the data-sharing agreements, data-impact assessments, and details of how the private companies stand to profit from their involvement.

The NHS is a precious public institution. Any involvement from private companies should be open to public scrutiny and debate. We need more transparency during this pandemic – not less.


By adding my name to this campaign, I authorise openDemocracy and Foxglove to keep me updated about their important work.

Had enough of ‘alternative facts’? openDemocracy is different Join the conversation: get our weekly email

Comments

We encourage anyone to comment, please consult the oD commenting guidelines if you have any questions.
Audio available Bookmark Check Language Close Comments Download Facebook Link Email Newsletter Newsletter Play Print Share Twitter Youtube Search Instagram WhatsApp yourData