> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# The jihadist style-journey: Germany’s election and after
- URL: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/the-jihadist-style-journey-germany-s-election-and-after/
- Published: 2009-09-29T01:09:20.000Z
- Updated: 2019-02-14T23:02:28.000Z
- Author: Ben O'Loughlin
- Tags: #en, #Migrated, #Import 2026-04-09 20:08

The general election in Germany on 27 September 2009 has seen the Christian Democratic Party again emerge as the largest party, giving Angela Merkel the opportunity to extend her term as chancellor and [head](http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,651610,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) a new governing coalition with the Free Democratic Party led by [Guido Westerwelle](http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,651884,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net). The election campaign was unusual in that foreign affairs, and especially Germany's military role in Afghanistan, played a prominent role - and in a way that has serious domestic-security consequences.

Mina Al-Lami is a visiting fellow in the [Department of Media and Communications](http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/media@lse/%20?ref=opendemocracy.net) at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)  
  
Ben O'Loughlin is [reader](http://www.rhul.ac.uk/politics-and-IR/About-Us/OLoughlin/?ref=opendemocracy.net) in international relations, and co-director of the [New Political Communication Unit](http://newpolcom.rhul.ac.uk/?ref=opendemocracy.net), at Royal Holloway, University of London. He is the co-author (with Andrew Hoskins) of [*Television and Terror: Conflicting Times and the Crisis of News Discourse*](https://www.opendemocracy.net/node/48719/%20http:/www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?is=0230002315) (Palgrave, 2009)

The debate over Afghanistan began to feature strongly in the campaign after an [incident](http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/afghanistan/la-fg-germany-afghan7-2009sep07,0,959965.story?ref=opendemocracy.net) on 4 September when *Bundeswehr* commanders requested an air-strike in Kunduz province against two fuel-trucks that had been hijacked by the Taliban, which led to the death of dozens of Afghan civilians. It intensified on 18 September with the broadcast of a new "video-letter" by [Bekkay Harrach](http://www.globaljihad.net/view%5Fpage.asp?id=1715&ref=opendemocracy.net), a 32-year-old German citizen of Moroccan origin and purported al-Qaida "soldier". The message of "Abu Talha al-Almani \[the German\]" (as Harrach is also known) echoes that in his earlier such videos, released in October 2008 and January 2009: he [urges](http://www.jihadica.com/abu-talha-the-german-threatens-to-attack-germany/?ref=opendemocracy.net) the German people to take responsibility for electing a government that will withdraw from Afghanistan, and says that their failure to do so would legitimise violent (and economically destructive) al-Qaida attacks against them.

The re-emergence of a *jihadi* threat increased security [concerns](http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4708562,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) in Germany in the last stages of the campaign. These are likely to continue long after the election. On the eve of the vote, an audio-announcement from Osama bin Laden himself was [posted](http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g4qpW10hY8oEB1g3dsh4lIbCk%5FVgD9AUJKS80?ref=opendemocracy.net) on *jihadist* websites; this "message to the European people" [called](http://www.icsr.info/blog/Bin-Ladens-Message-to-the-German-People?ref=opendemocracy.net) on European states to pull their forces from Afghanistan or bear the consequences, but of immediate significance is that German as well as English subtitles are provided. In the wake of the election, on 28 September, German security agencies detained two men in Munich said to have links with Harrach amid [warnings](http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,651811,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) of a possible threat to the famous *Oktoberfest* in the city.

It has been a regular part of the *jihadist* armoury during the 2000s to "intervene" around the time of elections in western states. The Madrid railway [bombings](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/globalisation/global%5Fpolitics/11M) of 11 March 2004 came three days before the [election](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-madridprevention/article%5F1795.jsp) in Spain, which resulted in the arrival in power of a new centre-left government committed to withdrawing its troops from Iraq; Osama bin Laden's video-message to the American people on 29 October 2004 was [released](http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/29/bin.laden.transcript/?ref=opendemocracy.net) four days before the presidential poll that led to George W Bush's re-election; the London bombings of [7 July 2005](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-terrorism/london%5F2655.jsp) took place a month after Britain's general election, and were followed by the broadcast of a video by the leader of the *jihadi* cell that [perpetrated](https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-terrorism/london%5Fbomb%5F2682.jsp) them, Mohammed Siddique Kahn.

In the context of this pattern of events - and especially of the "style" of the *jihadist* videos that have been posted over these years - there is something new and significant about Bekkay Harrach's "product" of 18 September 2009\. *Jihadist* leaders and sympathisers have always devoted careful attention to the appearance of the messenger as well as the content of their message - and have adopted varying [poses](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-islamicworld/article%5F69.jsp), from the gun-wielding desert-commander look to the headscarved, finger-pointing militant. The sensation of Harrach's latest [broadcast](http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,649987,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) is that he was dressed in a suit and tie, and was clean-shaven - the very model of a "clerical terrorist", even down to his long wavy hair.

  
Bekkay Harrach's broadcast

**The image and the message**

Bekkay Harrach's unconventional new look bears no resemblance to the tough-looking, weapon-brandishing, Afghan-styled *jihadist* of earlier videos. In October 2008, he sat in a mountainous area holding a bazooka with ammunition strapped to his chest, his head and face covered in black cloth with only his eyes visible. "Abu Talha" took aim at imaginary targets and fired some rounds. He was then shown sitting beside a rifle against a black background, issuing his warnings while raising an index finger in the approved fashion for emphasis. The aesthetics and tone of his January 2009 [video-message](http://counterterrorismblog.org/2009/01/nefa%5Ffoundation%5Fgerman%5Fal-qaid.php?ref=opendemocracy.net) were similar.

These precedents made the look and feel of the pre-election video all the more remarkable. Here, Harrach [looks](http://www.thelocal.de/national/20090919-22021.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) like any other modern-looking young man on the street and sounds like a soft-spoken and even shy adolescent, talking in a flat monotone without hand movements. The bright-red silk-curtain background is also a far cry from the rocky outcrops and weaponry of previous settings. In addition, the video announces itself as being presented by al-Qaida itself and not the [as-Sahab](http://www.globaljihad.net/view%5Fpage.asp?id=1132&ref=opendemocracy.net) media wing previously credited for Harrach's work.

The switch to a more "gentle" appearance and tone, and to a relatively more "conciliatory" title ("Security is a Mutual Interest"), is to some extent mirrored in the [content](http://counterterrorismblog.org/2009/09/nefa%5Ffoundation%5Fenglish%5Ftransc%5F1.php?ref=opendemocracy.net). Harrach repeatedly thanks the German government for extricating him from difficult situations in the middle east, acknowledges the German security forces for not harming his family despite knowing of his activities, and commends some of Germany's international policies; at one point he says: "we must bear in mind that Germany doesn't have blood on its hands like colonial states, the majority of its people want their troops out of Afghanistan, and most of all Germany's strong refusal to take part in the Iraq war."

Nevertheless, "wrong must be resisted and the wrongdoer faced". Harrach also warns of al-Qaida strikes on German soil if Germans fail to bring their troops home; advises Muslims in Germany to avoid visiting "unnecessary places" in the two weeks following the election; and asks young Muslim men, inside or outside Germany, to "leave al-Qaida to do its job if *jihad* starts in Germany", promising to inform them should they be needed in its second phase.

This "threat message" received extensive media [coverage](http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4706206,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) in the closing ten days of the election campaign. But although some stories mentioned Harrach's appearance, there was little or no discussion of the reasons for or possible implications of the transformation. Two possible explanations can be dismissed. First, it is not that Harrach decided to reveal his identity after his cover was blown, because in his first video he had already confidently and defiantly revealed his real name while describing a rendezvous with German security-services.

Second, it is unlikely that the man characterised as "Al-Qaeda's German terrorist" and "theBonn bomber"suddenly decided that modern business attire looks cool or hip. *Jihadists* may be adept at using such western inventions as mobile-phones and the internet, but the combination of a suit and tie and clean-shaven face is far from their view of the appropriate dress of an observant Muslim. Rather, growing a beard is (with reference to the *sunnah*, the ways of the [Prophet Mohammed](https://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe%5Fislam/mohammed%5F3866.jsp)) regarded as part of the obligations of dutiful Muslim men. This too makes Harrach's reversal particularly intriguing.

**The threat and the effect**

The true explanation for this radical departure from *jihadist* norms is more likely to be found in one or more of three other directions. First, there is a calculation that it will spread fear. German audiences are being presented with visual evidence that a *jihadist* can "look like them". Harrach is demonstrating that *jihadi* reality has outgrown the stereotype of the dark, bearded, angry-looking Muslim man - a point that might have particular resonance in Germany, where some of the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks were based and went unnoticed.

Second, the new style represents a challenge to western governments and security agencies. These have been emphasising the internal as well as external terrorist threat that requires stricter security measures, and have switched from ethnic or racial profiling to "behavioural" scrutiny - on the grounds that "anyone" could be a [*jihadist*](http://ctc.usma.edu/atlas/atlas.asp?ref=opendemocracy.net). The nightmare scenario for security agencies is the case of Christian or secular white citizens [converting](http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/6226935/Pakistan-discovers-village-of-white-German-al-Qaeda-insurgents.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) to Islam and carrying out violence in a matter of weeks or even days.

This shift is echoed in discussion on Islamist web-forums about Bekkay Harrach's transformation, alongside chatter about a possible imminent [al-Qaida](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/al-qaida-today-the-fate-of-a-movement) strike in the west. In debating the legitimacy of Harrach's "western" appearance, many participants conclude that the faithful soldier would only have worn this dress for a good reason: going undercover.

Third, there may be a tactical consideration: that Harrach's western apparel could give him a better chance of being heard by German audiences. *Jihadist*s are well aware of western broadcasting regulations, which have limited their ability to [spread](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/democracy%5Fterror/islamism%5Fweb) their message. Could it even be, as one member of a *jihadist* forum suggested, that Harrach's respectable style and moderate tone might enable his video to be shown on German television?

Bekkay Harrach, by mirroring the face and style of the "wrongdoer", is in this perspective trying to advance his *jihadi* agenda by creating a more diffuse and less directly intimidating presence in German society. The result of the [election](http://www.thelocal.de/national/20090928-22201.html?ref=opendemocracy.net), insofar as it offers little [prospect](http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4731038,00.html?ref=opendemocracy.net) of accelerating any German withdrawal from Afghanistan, represents no semblance of progress here. The Berlin government, and others which continue to deem al-Qaida a continuing threat, will use Harrach's example to justify their national-security agendas. And so the "war on terror" will quietly go on - until the next explosion. 

Among **openDemocracy's** many articles on *jihadism* in the post-9/11 world:

Malise Ruthven: "'[Born-again' Muslims: cultural schizophrenia](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-islamicworld/article%5F103.jsp)" (27 September 2001)

Murat Belge, "[Inside the fundamentalist mind](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-islamicworld/article%5F75.jsp)" (4 October 2001)

Omar al-Qattan, "[Disneyland Islam](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-islamicworld/article%5F69.jsp)" (18 October 2002)

Paul Rogers, "[The al-Qaida perspective" (9 January 2004)](https://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/View.jsp?id=1671)

[Faisal Devji, "](https://www.opendemocracy.net/articles/View.jsp?id=1671)[Spectral brothers: al-Qaida's world wide web](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-terrorism/jihad%5F2768.jsp)" (19 August 2005)

James Howarth, "[Al-Qaida, globalisation and Islam](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-middle%5Feast%5Fpolitics/al-qaida%5F3200.jsp)" (20 January 2006)

Mohammad-Mahmoud Ould Mohamedou, "[The dividends of asymmetry: al-Qaida's evolving strategy](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict-terrorism/asymmetry%5F4195.jsp)" (18 December 2006)

Paul Rogers, "[Al-Qaida's standing](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict/alqaida%5Fstanding%5F4460.jsp)" (22 March 2007)

Paul Rogers, "[Al-Qaida's fresh horizon](https://www.opendemocracy.net/conflict/qaida%5Fhorizon%5F4504.jsp)" (5 April 2007)

Patricia Crone, ['Jihad': idea and history](https://www.opendemocracy.net/faith-europe%5Fislam/jihad%5F4579.jsp) (1 May 2007)  
  
Paul Rogers, "[Al-Qaida: time on its side](https://www.opendemocracy.net/time%5Falqaida.jsp)" (4 June 2007)

Johnny Ryan, "[The militant Islamist call and its echo](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/democracy%5Fterror/islamism%5Fweb)" (1 August 2007)

Mohammad-Mahmoud Ould Mohamedou, "[Towards the real al-Qaida](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/democracy%5Fterror/real%5Fal%5Fqaida)" (10 September 2007)

Audrey Kurth Cronin, "[Al-Qaida: end of the beginning](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/conflicts/democracy%5Fterror/al%5Fqaida%5Fend%5Fof%5Fbeginning)" (11 September 2007) 

Pablo Policzer & Ram Manikkalingam, "[Al-Qaida: from centre to periphery](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/conflicts/democracy%5Fterror/al%5Fqaida%5Fperiphery)" (9 October 2007)

Patrice de Beer, "[Versailles to al-Qaida: tunnels of history](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/globalisation/institutions%5Fgovernment/peace%5Fwar)" (9 November 2007)

Paul Rogers, "[Al-Qaida's afterlife](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/conflicts/global%5Fsecurity/al-qaidas-afterlife)" (30 May 2008)

Fawaz Gerges,"[Al-Qaida today: a movement at the crossroads](https://www.opendemocracy.net/article/al-qaida-today-the-fate-of-a-movement)" (14 May 2009)