The UK economy is hooked on rising asset prices. What happens when the bubble bursts?

Image: Duncan Rawlinson, CC BY-NC 2.0

UK household real wages have just experienced their worst decade since the 1860s, and are still falling. Concern is building that a private debt crisis might threaten the UK economy. In a piece for the New Statesman, David Graeber warned ‘we’re staring into the lights of an oncoming train’.

It’s certainly true that UK households are spending more than their income at an unprecedented rate. In the first quarter of 2017, they ran a deficit of £17.5bn, an annualised deficit of £70bn (i.e. £17.5 bn *4). This means the average UK household is set to spend an astonishing £2300 more than its income this year. As a percentage of GDP in the chart below (see the green line), this is the highest household deficit recorded in over a century:

Source: Positive Money (using OBR and ONS provisional data, 4Q rolling average)

Without the benefit of such unprecedented household spending, the inconvenient truth is that the UK economy would be in recession today. In short, we need this household deficit to offset excess saving elsewhere in the economy. However, when this deficit can no longer be funded, the economy will stall. Household spending is being financed, in part, by rising consumer and student loan debt – set to increase by a record £31bn this year:

Source: Positive Money (using BoE, Student Loans company data): UK households are today accumulating £9bn pa in PCP car loans, £5bn pa credit card, £4bn other (e.g. overdrafts) and £13bn student loans.

We’ve seen this script play out before. Like stretching elastic, the more consumer debt is expanded the harder it becomes, and the greater the risk of a painful snap back. Most worrying about the UK economy today are deeply concerned about this rising level of debt. It’s alarming that total UK consumer and student loan debt will this year rise to £314bn, above its previous peak. The ‘oncoming train’ analogy is by no means inappropriate.

But what if there’s not just one train, but two? Where the second train is actually larger and so more dangerous: the risk of an abrupt fall in the price of UK household assets. The importance of asset prices, rather than just debt, can be understood using the data from the above two charts. We know UK households are set to spend £70bn more than their income this year and that higher consumer and student loan debt is set to fund £31bn of this. But this leaves a funding gap of £39 bn. Where is the money coming from?

The answer to this also helps explain an even more basic question: why on earth is the average UK household currently happy to spend £2300 more than its income this year? The answer to both is not debt, but capital gains. Capital gains on a truly spectacular and unprecedented scale.  A decades long decline in interest rates has caused the price of almost all financial assets – from houses to bonds and equities – to rise. In fact, since 1980, UK households have enjoyed an annual boost to their net wealth equivalent to 25% of GDP for over thirty-five years; this has utterly dwarfed anything they’ve been able to save out of their income:

Source: Positive Money (using ONS data)

This truly extraordinary windfall has given some lucky UK households both the motive as well as the added means to spend. After all, many can afford to run deficits when the value of their assets is rising even faster. Assuming these assets can be sold to savers (e.g. Rest of World) or those purchasing the assets using debt (e.g. mortgages), the capital gains that are released allow households to spend more than their income without so much as touching a credit card. With no red-ink left behind, this is the source of our £39bn funding gap for UK households.

The Bank of England is aware of this powerful mechanism. Straitjacketed by its mandate to generate 2% inflation, its QE program was introduced explicitly to inflate a ‘wealth effect’ to get households to spend. In Q1 2010, UK household saving peaked at £21bn per quarter. But by Q1 2017, household savings had reversed to running an unprecedented £17.5bn deficit. This swing in spending (equivalent to 7% of GDP) has been the main driver behind the UK’s moribund economic recovery.

To get households to spend a little bit more, we’ve had to make some people a great deal wealthier. But what helped to drive up household spending as asset prices rose risks driving their spending down when the situation reverses. The ratio of UK household net wealth to their disposable income ratio has now risen to an astonishing 8.6x, the highest level for any developed economy ever:

Source: Positive Money (using ONS data)

The risks of a private debt crisis are real enough. But the existential threat is that this will happen together with the bursting of the greatest asset bubble in modern economic history, just at the point when the Bank of England has no room to lower interest-rates. When consumer credit stops flowing and debtors try to pay back the money they owe, and when financial asset prices can no longer defy gravity, UK household spending will plummet. Then maybe, in a weak voice, we will ask one more question: why was no one able to foresee this?

  • @PositiveMoneyLeeds

    I’m not entirely convinced that the asset prices carry quite that much of the spending load. For instacne, part of the debt issue arises due the the recent and very clever, if invidious, way that new cars are financed in the private domestic sector. I believe this is spreading to other goods. These “leases” are financed and for many are simply higher debt not yet come home to roost. How accurately is this factored in to Positive Money’s “car loans” estimate? What allowances for the excess mileages, bumps and scratches the loan companies are fiercely imposing heavy charges for?

    However, the point is still well made. We are indeed looking into rapidly approaching headlights, just those of a bigger first train whatever the size of the second. Asset prices are certainly well into bubble territory and must be close to bursting.

  • spume

    Would OD be able to sum the red and green lines (corporate plus household debt) to demonstrate the accuracy with which it mirrors government debt? The point being that the government’s ability to borrow money cheaply is being squandered. Instead the economy is running on much more costly private debt meaning that the financial sector is taking an ever enlarging proportion of the ‘rent’ of the economy, to the detriment of other sectors. This is powerful argument for the government to borrow heavily, both to finance important real things like housing and health spending, and to reduce the debt + interest burden on the country as a whole by replacing expensive private debt with cheap public debt.

  • Ralph Musgrave

    There’s no problem there at all if (and it’s a big if) government makes up for any sudden fall in consumer demand with increased demand in the form of fiscal stimulus (as Steve Keen points out in the final paragraph of his recent book).

    Indeed that’s the basic message that Keynes spelled out. Though whether the assortment of incompetents and numpties in high places in this country have absorbed Keynes’s message is debatable (as I intimated in the above paragraph).

openDemocracyUK presents a debate about how to build a just, sustainable, and resilient economy. Find out more about the project & submit your ideas.


  • All
  • Civil Society
  • Constitution
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Infrastructure
  • Local Government
  • Measurement
  • Money
  • Ownership
  • Procurement
  • Regulation
  • Research and Development
  • Spending
  • Tax
  • Trade policy