- oD 50.50
No to TTIP
The sheer ugliness and anonymity of motorways seem only to reinforce their destructive environmental impact. Yet even motorways have their poets and celebrants. But what are they doing to our soul?
In a vigorous response to Martin Pawley, the Amsterdam-based editor of the Carfree Cities project argues that people can thrive in a dense urban fabric but only if the tyranny of the motor car is lifted.
The love affair between the city and cars is an illusion of the age. In fact, they are at war: an elephant and an army of ants. Cars rescue people from cities, offering a way of escape from urban concentration to the freedom of low-density living.
In a country obsessed with property and passion, the mere act of walking has often been seen as a political challenge. Yet English history is full of characters who have pushed against the boundaries to reclaim the empire underneath their feet.
Restless movement was to be an instrument of freedom and social advance. In an email to firstname.lastname@example.org, a critic of hypermobility argues the opposite: travelling more and further, we know and understand less.
Before the Great War, the authors grandfather mapped the route from the Welsh mountains to industrial Salford. More than thirty years later, his own escape from the mean streets of post-war Manchester to the Pennine hills begins the process of walking into that past experience and its still relevant truths.
A mother who takes her small children around their north London streets to walk, shop, play, smell, imagine and interact describes their endlessly various explorations. In an environment dominated by cars and speed, does this represent a different way not just of moving, but of being?
Transport, before it is policy or statistics, is the experience of movement; and the ways we move imply different patterns of living and being. The Ecology & Place co-editor opens our transport debate by reaffirming this truth, and looking freshly at the most elemental form of movement: walking.
Scientific research using stem cells may prevent disease and save lives. But concerns over intellectual property rights and the use of human embryos may block its advance. Can science survive if it becomes privately owned?
Bjorn Lomborgs The Sceptical Environmentalist is guilty of the very faults he ascribes to the green movement: from exaggeration to selective quotation and uncertain logic. In taking pot shots at a caricature, he discredits his own case. Environmentalists have nothing to fear from serious criticism. This is not it.
The morning shave and hair wash was once so simple. But life for a man is getting harder especially when you examine the shampoo bottle.
Mike Ashburner's article 'Privatising our genes' recounts how the race for the human genome raises questions about the forces of scientific advancement and their relationship with both governments and private companies: most urgently, whether patents can be extended into the human genome. Here are some openDemocracy readers' reactions to the story.
Money and power, as well as the passion for knowledge, drove the race to map the human genome. One of the worlds leading geneticists sees lessons for the public realm beyond the laboratory.
- 17 of 17