• Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Supporters
  • What they say
  • Donate
  • Submit
  • Contact
  • Jobs
Login or Register
Home
  • openDemocracy
    • About
    • Can Europe Make It?
    • Arab Awakening
    • openGlobalRights
    • Beyond Slavery
    • Civil Resistance
    • oD Blog
  • OurKingdom
    • About
    • Donate
    • Debates
    • OurNHS
    • LocalismWatch
    • OurBeeb
    • Shine a light
    • There is an Alternative
  • oDR
    • Ukraine
    • Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Rights
    • Media
    • Regions
    • Green Russia
    • Queer Russia
  • oD 50.50
    • Gender Politics Religion
    • Our Africa
    • People on the Move
    • Peacework & Human Security
    • Structures of Sexism
    • More
  • openSecurity
    • Cities in Conflict
    • Conflict in Context: Colombia
    • Syria's Peace
    • Future Under Surveillance
    • Whose Police?
  • Transformation
    • About
    • Transforming: Economics
    • Politics
    • Activism
    • Society
    • Ourselves
  • More
    • openIndia
    • Window on the Middle East
    • Digital Commons
    • Participation Now
    • Europe, the very idea

A temporary alliance? The AKP, Fethullah Gülen and religion in Turkish politics

William Armstrong 11 May 2012

With the Gülen movement emerging as a potential challenger for the governing AK Party, the future direction of Turkish politics will be determined by the outcome of the impending power struggle, argues William Armstrong.

With the ‘Turkish model ’ commonly cited as one of the inspirations for the revolts sweeping through the Arab region, and with much speculationabout the role of Islam in the newly emerging political systems in those countries, a closer look at religion’s potential future role in Turkish politics seems appropriate. Of course, it is perilous to look into the crystal ball and make predictions about the medium to long term political future of any country, and this is particularly so in a place with such a volatile political landscape as Turkey. However, at the risk of inviting egg on my face at some point in the future, I would fairly confidently suggest that Turkey will not simply ‘evolve away’ from politicised Islam any time soon – as many hailing the apparent civilianisation of Turkish politics and liberalisation of the country’s economy often tacitly assume. With roots deeply planted – most notably through the Gülen movement of reclusive religious preacher Fethullah Gülen  – it seems clear that religion will continue to play a significant role in Turkish political life, as in social life, for the foreseeable future. Whether its vehicle will remain the current ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), however, is not quite so certain.

Much has been made of the role and importance of the Fethullah Gülen movement, or cemaat  (‘community’), both inside and outside Turkey. It emerged as a significant force in the 1980s, initially coalescing around the personality of religious preacher Fethullah Gülen in the western Turkish city of Izmir. The movement today aims to promote conservative social values, with a soft, public face emphasising ecumenism, tolerance and inter-faith dialogue. Gülen now resides on a ranch in Pennsylvania, his cemaat having evolved into a multi-million dollar global network, sustained by donations from members and numerous commercial enterprises. It has been at least passively supported by the U.S. since the 1990s as an apparently moderate, relatively liberal expression of Islam. The Gülen movement is now active in 140 countries, with interests including boarding schools, universities, banks, media companies, newspapers, charities, and think tanks. There is also much evidence that its sympathisers have advanced into higher positions of power within the Turkish police force. As a recently “wikileaked” Stratfor  report suggested in 2009, the Gülen brotherhood is “perhaps the best-organized grass roots movement in Turkey … [with] a vast social and economic organization, intelligence assets, a global network”. The cable goes on to give an idea of how it sustains and expands itself:

FGC [Fethullah Gülen Community] businesses advertise heavily on FGC media, while FGC-owned media runs human interest stories and profiles of FGC sympathisers, businesses and schools. FGC members and sympathisers take holidays in FGC-owned hotels and shop at FGC-owned stores, and invest in FGC financial institutions. Graduates of FGC cramming schools funded by FGC businesses often serve as teachers in FGC schools overseas. Finally, FGC media, funded by FGC businesses, reacts sharply to any criticism directed at Fethullah Gülen.

In a country in which conspiracy theories often find fertile ground, the growth of this far-from-transparent and apparently unaccountable religious movement is alarming for many secular Turks. It would be wrong, however, to automatically equate the Gülen movement with the current Islamist government of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), as many observers tend to do. In fact, the two have significantly different origins. The AKP, which was established in 2001 and has been in government since 2002, evolved out of the Sunni orthodox Milli Görüş/Nakshibendi school, which found primary expression in the various political parties established over the years by the late Islamist leader Necmettin Erbakan. The Gülenists, on the other hand, stem from the ‘Nurcu’ movement, whose origins go back to the late-Ottoman/early-Republican-era Islamic theologian Bediuzzaman Said Nursî. In contrast with the Nakshibendis, the Nurcus have always emphasised their refraining from direct involvement in politics, and stayed largely non-partisan, their main aim being the rather more vague imana hizmet or ‘service to the faith’. Thus, the Gülen movement has only ever lent passive support to political parties over time, and it is significant that this support was never extended to Erbakan’s Refah (Welfare) Party in the 1980s and 90s, out of the ashes of which the AKP emerged.

Both the Gülen movement and the AKP share socially conservative values based on Sunni Islam, and have thus experienced a kind of alliance of convenience or symbiotic coexistence during the AKP’s term in power. The 2007 “e-memorandum” affair  (in which the Turkish military attempted a “post-modern” coup similar to that of 1997), as well as the 2008 closure case at the Constitutional Court against the AKP for alleged anti-secular activities, brought the two even closer together. However, there are increasing signs of a growing divergence of interests. The din surrounding recent reforms to compulsory education generally portrayed the developments as simply another round in the familiar secular-religious tug-of-war in Turkey. However, a more subtle interpretation was outlined in a recent piece  by M. Kemal Kaya and Halil M. Karaveli in Turkey Analyst, suggesting that the reforms were in fact – at least partly – the latest episode in the ongoing covert power struggle between the AKP and the Gülenists. Marked differences of opinion have also been apparent on such contentious topics as the recent Turkish football match-fixing investigation, the Kurdish question, and the continuing frictions with Israel.

It would thus be wrong to consider the Sunni religious community in Turkey a homogenous whole. Inevitably, there are fissures and power struggles contained within it, and it seems reasonable to suggest that the outcome of these shifting allegiances will be the dynamic that determines the future direction of Turkish politics, rather than the divided and ineffectual secular opposition. The Gülen brotherhood now has roots deeply planted in many of the institutions of public life in Turkey, and its sensitivities must be taken into account by any political group hoping for electoral success. In a largely pious and conservative country, it seems clear that religion will continue to play a significant role in the political sphere for a while yet. However, with recent indications of high-level schisms, far less clear is whether the AKP, or some other party that understands and is comfortable with this reality, will be the leading political force to harvest its energies.

About the author

William Armstrong is a freelance journalist and editor in Instanbul. He also writes in his personal blog. 

Subjects

Democracy and government

Turkey

Creative Commons License
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 licence. If you have any queries about republishing please contact us. Please check individual images for licensing details.

Highlights

Racial equality in the age of Obama
openDemocracy
War crimes in Syria: a missed opportunity for justice
Arab Awakening
Letter from a petro-state
openDemocracy
Privacy, surveillance and the state-corporate symbiosis
Can Europe Make It?
New security laws could make Turkey into a police state
openSecurity
The racist texts. What the Mubenga trial jury was not told
OurKingdom
Turkey's PM in conversation: the Arab Spring and Turkey
Richard Falk
A parallel universe: a response to Turkey's PM
Oguz Alyanak
Progressive Muslims in a world of ISIS and Islamophobes
openDemocracy 50.50
An untold story of British torture in Iraq
openDemocracy
Restoring justice to America
Transformation
A war of new connections
Columnist Paul Rogers
Previous Pause Next

What is oD?

openDemocracy is a digital commons - a pluralist, high quality online space free and open to all - covering world affairs, ideas and culture. More...

Join openDemocracy on Facebook Follow openDemocracy on Twitter Receive the openDemocracy email Subscribe Donate to openDemocracy
 

Most popular


Irresistibly biased? The blind spots of social innovation
Remko Berkhout

The ‘Muslim radicalisation of Central Asia’ is a dangerous myth
John Heathershaw
David W. Montgomery

A war of new connections
Paul Rogers

Iran vs ISIS, stubborn imperial designs
Hazem Saghieh

What doctors know - in England and in America
Paul Hobday


openDemocracy on Twitter

Tweets about "opendemocracy"

Remembering Howard Clark

HowardClark300x164.png
  • In memory of Howard Clark
    Howard Clark
  • Remembering Howard Clark
    Michael Randle
  • Howard Clark’s scholarship: commitment and contribution
    April Carter

More

Social media and social transformation

internet_0.jpg
  • Why we need the internet more today than ever before
    Indra Adnan and Neal Lawson
  • Can Facebook damage your mental health?
    Katherine Thorson
  • Beyond clicktivism
    Tom Lawson

More

Through Syrian Eyes

Looking inside the uprising logo
  • Assad's secular sectarianism
    Mohammad Dibo
  • Social networks in Syria: between mediation and mobilisation
    Hamzeh Moustafa
  • A Syrian fearing exile and return
    Maha Assabalani

More

Turkish Dawn

Eric Arnau/Flickr. Some rights reserved.
  • The cost of digital silence in Turkey: 40 million euros
    Jakub Hein

More

Pick of the web


How the west's campaign against IS lets the region off the hook
Our real white male problem - Jim Sleeper
Report portrays a broken CIA devoted to a failed approach
Turkish schoolboy accused of insulting president released from custody
A new politics - Paul Hilder
Stop TTIP

openDemocracy on Facebook

Liberalism in neo-liberal times

LibInNeoLib-300x125_0.png
  • A second response to Meredith Tax - straw men make poor argument
    Saadia Toor
  • Imperialist feminism: a response to Meredith Tax
    Deepa Kumar
  • The role of 'best examples' in human rights
    Monika Krause

More

The Browser

unnamed.png

Advertising notice

openDemocracy

  • Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Supporters
  • What they say
  • Donate
  • Submit
  • Contact
  • Jobs
  • Privacy
  • Licensing & Syndication
  • Advertise
  • Media Inquiries
  • Vacancies
  • RSS Feed

Sections

openDemocracy
Free thinking for the world
OurKingdom
Investigating the crisis of democracy in Britain
oDR
Russia and beyond
50.50
Critical perspectives: social justice, gender, pluralism
openSecurity
Conflict and peacebuilding
Transformation
Where love meets social justice

Most popular

Irresistibly biased? The blind spots of social innovation
Remko Berkhout

The ‘Muslim radicalisation of Central Asia’ is a dangerous myth
John Heathershaw
David W. Montgomery

A war of new connections
Paul Rogers

What doctors know - in England and in America
Paul Hobday

Iran vs ISIS, stubborn imperial designs
Hazem Saghieh


Recent comments

openDemocracy Ltd, The Print House, 18 Ashwin Street, London, E8 3DL. Tel: +44 (0) 207 193 0676

AddThis

|