Quote of the day

My students taught me that everything was personal - history, politics, foreign relations - but this approach creates boundaries as well as connections

Syndicate content

Embed this article

Want this article on your site? Check our licensing policy and Copy this code into your HTML

Navigation


View 12 comments

A past of power more than tribe in Kenya's turmoil

Kenya is tottering on the precipice as post-election violence rocks different parts of the country, in what the Nobel Peace laureate Wangari Maathai calls “ethnic cleansing.” But were the pogroms prefigured by Kenya’s political elite long before the first ballot was cast?

The New Year could be the start of a long annus horribilis for Kenya, which faces its most uncertain days in a generation. Already last week’s General Election, which saw President Mwai Kibaki officially re-elected as the head of the PNU (Party of National Unity), has triggered violence across the country that has claimed over 200 lives.

Among the casualties are 35 women and children burnt in a church in Eldoret, about four hours northwest of Nairobi, where they had sought refuge to escape election violence. Others who escaped the inferno were bludgeoned to death by warriors from the Kalenjin tribe.

William Ruto, a key figure in the Opposition Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) is a Kalenjin. The victims of violence were ethnic Kikuyus – President Kibaki’s tribe and the largest in Kenya. Raila Odinga, the leader of the ODM who is now contesting Kibaki’s re-election, is a Luo whose tribesmen are accused of killing ethnic Kikuyus in Nairobi’s slum of Kibera which forms part of his Langata constituency.

Tens of thousands have been displaced from their homes and are now camped in churches and police stations across the country. The head of Kenya's Red Cross Society, Abbas Gulled, has said warriors blocked roads tothe areas affected by conflict, frustrating the delivery of humanitarian aid. Police have also clashed with ODM supporters caught pillaging in Kisumu, some four hours west of Nairobi, and the coastal city of Mombasa and Kakamega in western Kenya.

Winding queues have become a common feature in the country’s capital city of Nairobi and other major urban centres as acute shortage of consumer goods and fuel are reported. Violence has disrupted public transport and its ramifications are being felt beyond the Kenyan borders, which serves as the gateway to commerce for land-locked East and Central African countries such as Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. Vice-President Moody Awori says Kenya’s national economy is losing over 15 million pounds daily.

The American ambassador to Kenya Michael Ranneberger, hailed the Kenya General Election (in which the incumbent Kibaki claims a 200,000 majority over his rival’s 4,300,000 votes) as “a model for world democracies,” while the European Union Observer Mission called for an independent audit of the poll, after the opposition claimed massive rigging. At the same time the PNU has raised claims of vote rigging against the opposition. Government officials maintain that Kibaki was re-elected fairly and advised anyone with evidence to the contrary to petition the election through the courts.

This is a route Odinga is not willing to take, announcing he will mobilise one million supporters to endorse him as “the people’s president.” This sounds like a script straight from the Filipino 2001 Second People Power Revolution when Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was sworn in as president at a public square before driving Joseph Estrada out of office after the police and the army withdrew their support.

Rumours were rife in Kenya this week alleging that the Police Commissioner Maj Gen Hussein Ali and Army head Joseph Kianga had resigned to protest the poll outcome. This prompted the Government Spokesman Alfred Mutua to state that the two were behind the President. The Attorney General Amos Wako has called for an independent inquiry into the vote.

As the militant African-American activist Malcolm X would have put it, power “by any means necessary” is a mantra that perfectly fits Odinga, who was detained for six years for his role in the abortive 1982 coup in Kenya.

Not spontaneous anarchy

What is unfolding in Kenya may be anarchy but it has also been choreographed long before the first ballot was cast. Beyond picking its name from the Ukraine’s Orange Revolution movement, the ODM election strategy was overseen by Dick Morris, the disgraced political strategist once investigated for tax evasion in the US, and who was alleged to have been instrumental in fomenting revolution in Ukraine and Mexico.

Presenting Morris in Nairobi late last year, Odinga announced that the American would serve as his chief campaign strategist. He had to beat a retreat after local media exposed Morris as the Republican who moonlighted for the Bill Clinton campaign before being fired for allowing a prostitute to eavesdrop on his conversation with the former American president. That was the last that was heard publicly of Morris, although he is listed to have donated 165,000 Kenyan pounds to the ODM campaign kitty in pro-bono services.

The birth of ODM is rooted in another revolt that commenced in earnest in 2005. It set the stage for the anarchy now being played out. In 2002, Kibaki had joined a short-lived political formation, the National Rainbow Coalition (Narc) that brought together his then Democratic Party with Odinga’s Liberal Democratic Party and Charity Ngilu’s Social Democratic Party - while former Foreign minister Kalonzo Musyoka defected from the Kenya African National Union (Kanu) which had taken power from Britain in 1963.

This formidable force, with Kibaki as the compromise candidate, romped to victory in the December 2002 election. Grumbling started soon after over a mysterious Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that was allegedly signed between Kibaki and Odinga. Incensed by the constant bickering about the MoU, Kibaki fired Odinga from cabinet alongside his lieutenants such as Peter Anyang Nyong’o and Kalonzo Musyoka. This was after they campaigned against the draft Constitution during the 2005 Constitutional referendum: their “No” orange symbol clashing with the government’s “Yes” symbol of a banana.

Those fired from the cabinet congregated under the banner of ODM and were joined by Uhuru Kenyatta, son of founding President Jomo Kenyatta, with the subtle nudging from retired President Daniel arap Moi. Their vacant cabinet positions were filled with opposition MPs from Kanu other parties. After the fall-out with Kibaki in 2005, Odinga then broadened his political net by enlisting the support of William Ruto from the former white settlements of Rift Valley, and former Vice President Musalia Mudavadi, who is from the populous Western province, two of the provinces that provided the bulk of Odinga’s presidential votes, and which PNU claims were inflated in favour ofthe ODM presidential candidate.

William Ruto rose to national fame in 1992 as the head of Kanu’s youth lobby group that gobbled up millions of shillings printed to fund the Moi re-election campaign. This triggered unprecedented national inflation that took a decade to mop up, and he now faces several graft cases in court, blemishing Odinga’s anti-corruption election pledge.

Odinga’s running mate, Mudavadi, served as Finance minister in the early 1990s when the monumental financial scam known as the Goldenberg took place, in which over 5 million pounds was looted from the public coffers. This involved compensation for fictitious gold exports by the government.

The appointment of former Kibaki allies in the Democratic Party elicited grumbling that the president was solidifying his Kikuyu support basewith cronies from his Kikuyu tribe who ODM bigwigs would derisively label the “Mount Kenya Mafia.”

Soon, “Mt Kenya Mafia” became a euphemism for ethnic Kikuyus, who mainly live in the Central part of the country, shadowed by Mt Kenya’s towering peak, the second highest in Africa. “Mt Kenya Mafia” became a rallying call in ODM’s referendum campaigns, implying the need to overthrow Kikuyu hegemony and their domination the economy and public service, as the country’s only salvation.

The founding president Kenyatta was Kikuyu, and the Central province, the country’s breadbasket, has better infrastructure that most regions in the country. Quite unsurprisingly, Majimbo (federalism) came to the fore during the referendum and subsequent election campaigns, as the best arrangement to even the country’seconomic disparities.

It was rooted in earlier conflicts of the Moi era (1978 – 2002). Moi was from a minority tribe in the Rift Valley. This became an epicentre of politically instigated so-called “ethnic clashes" directed at migrant communities of Kikuyus and Luhyas, who were perceived as opposition supporters. The Moi regime orchestrated seasons of blood that recurred in election years between 1992 and 2002, pogroms that succeeded in scuttling the Kikuyu and Luhya vote as they were displaced during election time, while making a score for Majimbo proponents who believed (and possibly still do) its implementation includes expelling “foreign” tribes in their midst.

The 2005 constitutional review, which had been in abeyance for over a decade, provided a dress rehearsal for an ODM “people power” revolution. Its “Mt Kenya Mafia” sentiments were seen as a rebuttal against the conservative Kikuyu elite who had kept the country pretty much under their control. The ODM bigwigs followed a revolution manual where ethnicity was at the core of its propaganda machine. They were gearing up for the second phase of their propaganda war. This included whipping up ethnic animosities in which the Kikuyu were demonised, hiring pollsters to claim massive leads so as to demoralise and scuttle the rival vote while making constant claims of rigging to prepare the ground for rejecting the poll results if defeated.

Even in the referendum Odinga claimed a verdict in favour of the government would mean the contest had been rigged. In the event, the ODM won it resoundingly so claims of rigging did not arise. It was also seen as a vote-of-no confidence against the government, with Odinga temporarily asserting pressure on Kibaki to resign.

The rest of the script was played out after last week’s General Election. Rigging claims were used to the hilt by the ODM to plant seeds of doubt in their supporters to prepare them to reject an unfavourable outcome and foment unrest that would set in motion a “people power” revolution.

ODM supporters dramatised the rigging claims, killing three policemen deployed to administer the polls in Eldoret on the eve of Election Day. They were lynched by youths who claimed they had been sent by the government to prepare ground for rigging, as a vehicle belonging to the Electoral Commission of Kenya was torched.

Odinga himself would march to a city hotel on the same night to make similar claims of poll rigging accompanied by a partisan local media that must share the blame for the social conflagration that threatens the very future of their country.

Odinga supporters rejected the poll outcome even before it was announced, with Kibera residents, one of Africa’s largest slums and the stronghold of the opposition chief, going on the rampage, looting and killing those perceived to be supporters of Kibaki’s, who were seen as conspirators “stealing the election.”

Odinga has vowed to get sworn in separately (as in the Ukraine and the Philippines) citing the flawed polls as evidence while mobilising supporters to demonstrate in major urban centres to paralyse the economy to make the country ungovernable.

Andeven further back

Today’s raging ethnic tensions echo a dispute that started much earlier, just after the birth of the East African nation. The year was 1969 and Kenya’s founding President Jomo Kenyatta was settling in office, with Odinga’s father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga as his vice-prsident.

Western powers were digging in to secure a strategic foothold in the region at the height of the Cold War. Kenyatta turned West, to its former colonial master Britain, and the US; Odinga looked East to China and Russia. The ideological bubble exploded in July 1969, precipitated by the assassination of populist politician Tom Mboya, another leading Luo politician and Kenyatta ally. That an ethnic Kikuyu, Nahashon Njenga Njoroge, was convicted and hanged for Mboya’s murder did not help matters at all.

The presidential motorcade was pelted with stones in Kisumu, Kenya’s third largest city and Odinga’s homeland where Luos live byfishing and subsistence farming. Kenyatta never returned to the region for the next decade, and this marginalisation would last through Moi’s long rule of 24 years.

Nowaged 62, Odinga appreciates that time is not on his side and his prospects for winning power are dimming with the passage of time. On the other hand, Kibaki, 76, recognises this will be his last term in office so has nothing to lose, giving credence to the Kenyan proverb that when two elephants fight, it is the grass that gets injured.

But if all the grass is destroyed, the sage should have added, there will be no grass left for the elephants to feed on.

In the meantime, the South African Nobel Peace laureate Desmond Tutu has arrived, and is reported as saying: "This is a country that has been held up as a model of stability. This picture has been shattered." His aim is to engineer dialogue between Odinga and Kibaki, as the United Nations and the African Union make a similar push for peace, to get back to that treasured stability. It remains to be seen if a political settlement is possible to defuse the social implosion, although that may not bring about the much-needed resolution of ethnic tensions that politicians have fanned over the past few years.

Peter Kimani is a Kenyan journalist based in Nairobi and author of a political novel, Before The Rooster Crows

 

Average rating
(4 votes)

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/35486
 
This article is published by Peter Kimani, , and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

Anthony Barnett said:



Thu, 2008-01-03 23:13
Peter, I found reading this very compelling. Its a terrible story, but it is also a relief to read an account which does not blame the West or look to the outside influence, but does suggest how western influence can be used, especially bad American advice! We have quite a lot of that in the UK, with only ourselves to blame. I am wondering now what you think needs to be done to prevent a deep civil war.
login or register to post comments | email this comment

dohenyjc said:



Sat, 2008-01-05 19:38
Nobel Peace laureate Wangari Maathai came closest to the truth. Kenya's descent into savagery has the hallmarks of an orgy of "ethnic cleansing," You could even call it a sanitizing crusade! And Peter Kimani is hopelessly wrong: the pogroms were definitely NOT "prefigured by Kenya's political elite". The killing and destruction was a spontaneous reaction to electoral fraud. If anything, Kibaki and his cronies were very much surprised by the savagery of the popular reaction. The fact is that Kenya's political elite had grown overconfident, thinking they could get away with wholesale tampering with the election results. They miscalculated, forgetting that the majority of rural Kenyans still live in a pre-rational world where frustration, especially a major political frustration, can trigger a massive loss of self-control, followed by a rage-driven sanitizing orgy. This sudden regression to ancient tribal ways is a common reaction amongst peoples who have not had enough time to adapt to modern democracy. This is one area where superficial appearances can be deceptive. Would-be dictators - please take note!
login or register to post comments | email this comment

Anthony Barnett said:



Sun, 2008-01-06 12:34
Dear Peter, Your article is a very well written piece that details political history and how it affects the present, international ideological interests and how they play a part locally, political lusts for power, tribalism and tribalist scapegoating, and the human element of real people suffering. Nobody who has read Ngugi's Wizard ought to be surprised, but your writing is very clear and courageous. I feel that only you could have written it, so it is a good thing you went back when you did. Keep on keeping on. Peter Nazareth
login or register to post comments | email this comment

dohenyjc said:



Sun, 2008-01-06 19:32
What can be done to prevent Kenya lapsing into civil war? Nothing! Kenya's ruling elite have shown themselves to be nothing more than the architects of a corrupt tribal state where tribal loyalties long ago ousted democratic principles. By hijacking the election results, Kibaki snuffed out any hope of political reform. The opposition can now either share power with Kibaki's corrupt administration or take up arms. The choice for Odinga is stark: collusion with, or eventual violent overthrow of, Kibaki and his regime. And Odinga has let it be known that he will not share power with a regime founded on electoral fraud. Apart from prolonged civil unrest - followed by an eventual eruption into civil war - what other options does he have?
login or register to post comments | email this comment

solana.larsen@o... said:



Tue, 2008-01-08 14:26
This is one of the clearest and best articles I have read on the reasons for the conflict raging in Kenya. It's complicated! No wonder foreign journalists are having such a hard time describing it concisely. Thank you Peter.
login or register to post comments | email this comment

Rob Maiya said:



Mon, 2008-01-14 13:08

Peter Kimani's article makes good reading, but it is just one of those many articles that basically seek to explain a simple occurrence using lopsided historical perspectives that have been cobbled together. Kenyans have lived together for many years without resorting to the levels of violence that was witnessed recently. It is important to reiterate one fact: that there would have been no violence at all if the elections were not rigged in full view of the whole nation. It is unfortunate that during such scenarios, violence could have been the only viable resort for a disenfranchised population. I would expect respected journalists like Peter Kimani to use their pen first to acknowledge the obvious injustice of Kibaki and his henchmen openly rigging the election, without searching for answers in a past which most Kenyans in their thirties like myself, don't even understand and don't really care about. In Kenya, Kibaki embodies an emerging autocracy that believes that power can be grabbed regardless of popular opinion. It is Kibaki's Government which sowed and continues to water the seeds of discord with the arrogance that only increases by the minute - and which may eventually irrevocably alienate Kenyans from each other. This is the bit that needs to be acknowledge first - because at the end of the day, there are 48 communities in Kenya, and over 40 of these voted Kibaki out of power. And he decided to stay, just like every other corrupt dictator does. Once we acknowledge this very basic fact other historical facts or otherwise (like the ones presented by Peter Kimani) become only footnotes to the real tragedy that may yet unfold in Kenya

login or register to post comments | email this comment

Pettigrew said:



Tue, 2008-01-15 00:10

I hope that people like Anthony Barnett and Sorlasa Larsen do not end up believing all that has been written on these pages by my compatriot Mr. Peter Kimani. I'm tempted to call it dishonest journalism but choose not to go down that route.

It is true that Kenya has witnessed some terrible events this past fortnight, events that anybody with an ounce of decency would never wish on their worst enemy. However, to blame it all on the opposition displays a bias that should have no place in Kenyan society during these straitened times for our young democracy. It is my opinion and that of millions of other Kenyans that the post-election violence has been caused by one thing and one thing only. The fact that the presidetial election was stolen in the full glare of both local and international TV cameras. A truly shameful event that has come to be labelled 'twilight robbery'. The mayhem kicked off within moments of the fraudulent results being declared.

I also find it quite interesting that Mr Kimani does not once refer to the people who have been killed as a result of the shoot to kill policy currently being implemented by the Kenyan security forces. I refer you to an article by the same journalist written 9 months ago that was titled "Kenya's Voices of discontent". Here is an extract from that article;

"On 10 March 2007, a contingent of armed policemen and city guards descended on the park where groups of Kenyan youths meet daily to discuss public issues. After lengthy and indiscriminate beatings, five people were hospitalised and fifty-seven others held at the nearby central police station. Twenty-seven people have since been charged with malicious damage to property and obstructing council guards from undertaking their duties, charges that the "parliamentarians" say are trumped up.

The arrest and trial of Kenyan citizens in lawful assembly is being interpreted as a manifestation of the grave threat to Kenya's democratic space, and growing intolerance of alternative views. "Although we are not less free, the government appears hesitant to respect Kenyans' freedoms", says Kang'ethe Mungai, who heads the People Against Torture lobby group".

It is easy to see that a government that was always ready to adopt a heavy handed approach to any form of dissent has been willing to kill now that the stakes are considerably higher. Many Kenyans like myself will find it intriguing that honest and open condemnation of a government and a president who in the writer's own words had also failed to address the country's underlying political and social problems has now morphed into total support for a man who looks set to make the country another African basket case. It may be a case of closing ranks to fight a threat to a presidency that is considered by some as a birthright but I implore Mr. Kimani to find it within himself to wield the power that comes with the opportunity to write in forums such as this one responsibly.

login or register to post comments | email this comment

Chasoh said:



Sat, 2008-01-26 16:21

As a Kenyan and a person who has seen all that the current political situation has been like, it is unfortunate to term the commentary by my fellow countryman Peter Kimani as not even half true. Unfortunately, Kimani comes from Kibaki's tribe and its obvious that he is leaning more towards making Kibaki look like the Angel while at the same time demonising Mr. Raila Odinga. In the true sense, the opposition has a true case and kenyans have a right to fight for what is right (though not right to fight and destroy property leave alone taking away lives), that is, probably a stolen election. And to correct you sir, (i don't know where you are getting your information from), It is on record and was aired in the kenyan media Mr. Raila saying that he is not going 'to do an Abiola here' to quote him, meaning he doesnot intend to declare himself president like the late Abiola did in Nigeria. I believe the world deserves to know the truth and especially from journalists like you sir.

login or register to post comments | email this comment

dohenyjc said:



Tue, 2008-01-29 12:29

Here's a new concept for all those academic commentators struggling to make sense of Kenya's post-electoral descent into savagery: CONTAMINATION ANXIETY. It lurks at the root of class divisions in every type of society and in all historical periods; it is the driving force behind horrors such as ethnic cleansing and sectarianism, tribal rivalries and racial tensions. Qualitatively, contamination anxiety is the same for all individuals, no matter what his or her cultural background or class status. But quantitatively, it varies in degree from one individual to another. Some people have it to a mild or moderate degree. And a minority have it to such an extreme degree that they can be said to be afflicted with a delusion of contamination. These are the extreme purists in every walk of life - in politics and religion especially. They see polution where the rational mind sees no polution or blemish. Compulsion-driven to sanitize, they are the architects of every kind sanitizing crusade. The one-man sanitizing orgy of the serial killer who 'cleans up' his neighbourhood by murdering prostitutes is common enough occurrence. Then there is the institutionalized and organised variety of sanitizing pogrom like the nazis 'final solution' to the Jewish question, or Slobodan Milosevic's massacre of Albanian muslims, and so on ad nauseum.

What we have in Kenya is a spontaneous eruption from the grassroots. Beginning as a popular protest against the blatant tampering with election results, it quickly degenerated into an orgy of enraged settling of old inter-tribal scores. What Africa's political leaders (and Kofi Annan in particular) must confront is the sober fact that generations of delusional distortion can lurk unseen behind the trappings of democracy, only to explode when the appropriate catalyst appears.

login or register to post comments | email this comment

dohenyjc said:



Wed, 2008-01-30 15:49

The problem with a concept such as delusion of contamination at the pathological extreme of the religious spectrum is its ubiquitous presence in attitudes, values and actions deemed by religious and political extremists to be virtuous! Muqtada Sadr and Mullah Omar massacre their sectarian enemies in the sure knowledge that theirs is just and holy work. Note how easily the the sanitizing mindset tramples, not only the rational mind, but conscience as well! In Kenya, people who a few short weeks ago were neighbours, colleagues or friends in an instant became the terrified prey of frenzied, machete-wielding mobs.

But perhaps the main problem with delusion of contamination as a concept is the dread it seems to inspire in most academic commentators contributing to this forum! They seem to be afflicted with an entrenched intellectual taboo, sticking doggedly to their futile theorizing, burning up miles of column inches without ever explaining anything! Gentlemen and Ladies if I many say so - bite the bullet now! As you are, you waste everybody's time! But you cannot bury your heads in the sand for much longer. Too much is at stake. We have a civilization to defend! And righ now, we are losing the war!

login or register to post comments | email this comment

dohenyjc said:



Thu, 2008-01-31 13:15

Our western academic commentators - like the rest of us - are sorely compromised by a labyrinthine system of intellectual taboos. Inherited from Christianity, these inhibitions stand guard over the gateway to regions of the mind where lurk the springs of all sorts of sanitizing obsessions. And the religious institutions responsible for these taboos are none other than those guilty of launching countless sanitizing crusades. For example, I have never heard a European or American historian ask in print where the nazis got their rabid anti-semitism! The answer is obvious - they got it from Christianity! So 'The Final Solution' turns out to be an attempt to finish off what Christians started two centuries before.

This is the sort of intellectual inhibition that keeps most of us ignorant of the jihadist mindset, in particular his motivational state. The longer that black hole persists, the longer we put off the ability to recognise the individual jihadist - especially those biding their time under deep cover.

Would our security services please take note!

login or register to post comments | email this comment

manderaman said:



Tue, 2008-04-15 13:26

Peter kimani though a respected journalist is indeed,from his articles playing a partisan role. In one of his articles he praises Odinga since at that time Mr. Odinga wholeheartedly supported Mr. Kibaki, in another article he demonize Odinga and an American called Morris simply because Mr. Odinga is no Longer saying Kibaki Tosha rather Kibaki Toka after he was robbed of victory in last year general election.

In Africa, Janitors, professional alike, are stalwart supporters not of their country rather their tribe, in other words patriotism is a rare commodity in Africa. That is why many African countries are under the mercy of civil war, abject poverty etcetera.

So my dear Kenyans lets be realistic and ignore the monster called tribe

login or register to post comments | email this comment