Home truths in the Muslim family

Sky rocketing rates of women's employment in Muslim countries and recent scholarship that has developed a vision of Islam that insists on equality between men and women, mean that the global pressure to reform Muslim family law is mounting, writes Cassandra Balchin.

Muslim women's demands for equality and justice in the family seem to be reaching a critical mass, coinciding with what some are heralding as a ‘paradigm shift' in Muslim theological and jurisprudential scholarship. There is clearly a disconnect between the realities of Muslim society on the one hand and the family laws that govern Muslims on the other. This gap lies at the centre of some of the most heated theological and juristic debates in the Muslim world today. It has the potential to bring about some of the most important changes in the Muslim world for centuries - and the response stands in sharp contrast to trends of rising religious fundamentalism.

"When I went to the kadi [Muslim judge] to request a divorce from my husband, the kadi said to me, ‘Go back home and stay in your marriage just like your mother did'," says a woman from the Gambia, angry that religious authorities offer no real solutions to social problems such as domestic violence, abandonment and discrimination between wives in a polygamous marriage.

Home Truths: A Global Report on Equality in the Muslim Family is a compilation of short reports from women's organisations and researchers in 30 countries of Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and North America. The catalogue of discriminations are remarkably similar despite the variety of contexts and legal systems. They include women's limited autonomy in marriage and divorce, inequitable property rights and denial of full rights over the custody and guardianship of their children. In Afghanistan since March 2008 there have been 100 cases of self-immolation - a traditional method of protest by women against extreme domestic unhappiness.

It is not just women who are questioning the traditions that religious authorities justify as ordained by Allah. "For nearly 20 years, it was my sister who gave my parents a monthly allowance. She even quit her job to look after our father until his death. She paid all the medical bills. When it came to sorting out his estate, my brother insisted that we follow faraid [Islamic inheritance rules]. But I disagreed. I feel that my sister was there for our father when we were not. My brother does not talk to me now. But our children talk..."

The story comes from Malaysia, where roughly half of working age women are in the labour force. But it could just as well come from the many other Muslim countries where women's employment rate has sky rocketed. For instance, according to the ILO between 1990 and 2003 the Arab region women's share of economic activity increased at more than six times the global rate.

Male drug addiction, shifting patterns of employment due to the demands of globalised production, labour migration and displacement due to conflict have all meant that increasing numbers of households in Muslim contexts are headed by women or have a sole female breadwinner. In Morocco, 15 percent of families are women-headed, rising to 29 percent in Mauritania. From Britain to Iran, girls are increasingly outnumbering boys from Muslim communities in higher education.

Hard statistics on historical divorce and separation rates are difficult to come by, but the anecdotal evidence is everywhere: the classical construction of the Muslim family headed by a male breadwinner with a dependent, obedient wife simply no longer works.

If it ever did. The Prophet's first wife was a successful business woman who herself proposed marriage to Muhammad before he became Islam's Prophet; the marriage remained monogamous throughout her lifetime. Great Ancestors, published by Women Living Under Muslim Laws [www.wluml.org], reveals a 1,400 year history of Muslim women who wrote their own marriage contracts, litigated in court, engaged in politics, were recognized scholars, and who punished husbands that even thought of taking additional wives.

A dual process of rediscovering classical Muslim thinkers who emphasised rationality and the flexibility of human interpretation, and of reinterpreting Islam's texts in the light of contemporary social needs has been gathering pace roughly since the 1950s. The growth in past two decades has been exponential. Male and female scholars [I1] from diverse contexts such as Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Morocco, Pakistan, South Africa, Sudan, and the United States have developed a vision of Islam that insists that the Qur'an mandates equality between all human beings, including between men and women. This is not the ‘equity' of the apologists, but a claim for an end to all forms of discrimination, especially within the family.

Distinguishing between the Shariah (the path towards God) and the human process of deciding precisely what laws follow this path - known as fiqh or jurisprudence - these scholars say that because the laws are not divine, they can be - and in the past were - changed to match society's needs.

Middle Eastern historians note that in fact the codified family laws that dominate the region are the product of colonial times, and reflected dominant European Victorian notions of gender relations. The process was similar throughout West Africa and South Asia.

While many Muslim countries are stuck with these laws, in most there is a visible movement for progressive reform of family laws. Ironically, the exceptions are mostly minority migrant Muslim communities in the West, where religious fundamentalists appear to have successfully drawn a veil over the extraordinary activism that is taking place in the supposedly ‘backward' rest of the Muslim world.

Although demands for Muslim family law reform date back more than a century, increasingly reform movements (as well as efforts to protect existing rights in places such as former Soviet Central Asia) are specifically demanding equality between men and women, and critiquing the classical notion of the Muslim family. This is a major shift.

There has already been considerable success in Turkey, which completely overhauled its Civil Code in 2001, and Morocco which introduced a drastically reformed Moudawana, or personal status code, in 2004. Both laws were the result of sustained campaigns by coalitions of women's organizations, and both have provisions that state the equal rights and responsibilities of husbands and wives.

In the case of Morocco, whose law is derived from Islam, women's rights activists used a combination of arguing for reform from within the framework of religion; constitutional equality provisions and other national legislation; international human rights standards; and on the basis of women and men's lived realities.

This comprehensive framework is now inspiring a global movement designed to support national family law reform projects and efforts to protect existing rights in Muslim contexts across the world.

On 13 February, participants from some 50 countries, activists and academics, are gathering in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to launch Musawah-a global movement for equality and justice in the Muslim family. Musawah, which means ‘equality' in Arabic, has been some two years in the planning, and promises to offer those who oppose positive change quite a few home truths.

 


[I1]These include Nasr Abu Zayd, Kyai Hussein, Nasaruddin Umar, Abdolkarim Soroush, Sana Benachour, Fazlur Rehman, Khalid Masud, Abdullahi an-Na'im, Keica Ali, Ziba Mir-Hosseini, Amina Wadud, Khaled Abou el-Fadl.

Cassandra Balchin is a freelance researcher, writer and human rights advocacy trainer. Formerly a journalist based in Pakistan, she has published on Muslim family law and international development policy regarding religion. She is on the planning committee of Musawah (Equality).

This article is published by Cassandra Balchin, and openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it without needing further permission, with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. These rules apply to one-off or infrequent use. For all re-print, syndication and educational use please see read our republishing guidelines or contact us. Some articles on this site are published under different terms. No images on the site or in articles may be re-used without permission unless specifically licensed under Creative Commons.

Comments

Unapproachable
10 February 2009 - 3:05pm

Its funny how we talk down to muslim people with out understanding their sense of identity and world view. Typical stereotypes and cliches do not offer anything constructive.When I saw the tittle of this article I knew that i would see statements like religious fundamentalism and backwards or my favorite Med-evil. Its true that there is more to muslims then you think. There are complex dynamics at work. Religious and spiritual believes, as well as culture, identity. Muslims from Asia do not have the same dynamics as Muslims from Africa. Things are more complex then that.I know that people in the media are unwilling to try to understand Islam on a intellectual level. As a young black man people like me have always been seen as a threat to society long before they even cared about my beliefs.Muslim dose-not equal Arab. The problems which the global muslim community has is that they have been vilified and dehumanized plus years of stagnations and underdevelopment. What the Muslims need is modernization not just in how to deal with new things like, globalization, the internet and social reforms. But how to train and educate their community leaders to deal with modern problems. We dont need Judge Judy we need Dr Phill. I subject you look up Imam Suhaib Webb on the net or youtube or google. Islam is not backwards and the Quran dose not teach bad things. It is because of the cultural dynamics and lack of modernization that the classical scholarship of rationality and the flexibility have not had a chance to deal with these new things. The first Scholar of Islam was a women and there are many women in history who have achieved alot in muslim society. No community is with out its problems, but lets make a separation between Culture and authentic Islamic Teachings.Thanks 

RobPC (not verified)
13 February 2009 - 11:42am

"the Quran dose not teach bad things".
Here are some of the good things the Qur'an teaches.
".... I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, Smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger tips of them." [8:12].
“It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land.” [8:67]
“O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives … and those whom thy right (sword) hand possesses of the captives of war whom Allah has assigned to thee.” [33:50]. “Married women are forbidden to you except the captives your sword hand possesses.” [4:24]
“One-fifth of your spoils of war shall belong to Allah, the Apostle, the Apostle's kinsfolk, the orphans, the destitute, and the traveler in need.” [8:41]
“You shall be called upon to fight a mighty nation, unless they accept Islam.” [48:16]
“Warfare is prescribed for you” [2:216].
“Who so fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or victorious, on him we shall bestow a vast reward.” [4:74]
“Hast thou not seen those unto whom it was said: Withhold your hands and establish worship and pay the poor-due? But when fighting was prescribed for them, behold! a party of them fear mankind even as they fear Allah or with greater fear, and say: Our Lord! why hast Thou ordained fighting for us? If only Thou wouldst give us respite for a while. I Say: The comfort of this world is scant; the Hereafter will be better for him that wardeth off evil.” [4:77]
"Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another, but ruthless to unbelievers." [48:29]

“Allah promises you will capture much booty.” [48:20]
“Slay the pagans wherever ye find them”.[9:5]
“Fight the unbelievers till they pay the Jizya tax on unbelievers and are subdued.”[9:29]
"Prepare for them whatever force and cavalry ye are able of gathering, to strike terror, to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah and your enemies."[8:60]
"…. if they turn renegades, seize them and kill them wherever ye find them, and take no friends or helpers from their ranks." [4:89]
"Fight them until there is no dissension, and the religion is entirely Allah's." [8:39]

Qur’an 59:2-7 is a commentary on the start of Mohammed’s ethnic cleansing of Arabia, with his military attack against the Jews of Bani-Nadir. (As with much of the Qur’an its context is made clear by the related sacred Hadiths which are detailed accounts of Mohammed’s sayings.)
These Qur’an verses below make clear that the Jews were acting defensively, that Allah approved of their exile and the unexpected innovation of cutting down their desert food trees to terrorise them, and Allah granted the Muslims ownership of the property of the evicted Jews.

“He it is who hath caused the Jews who disbelieved to go forth from their homes unto the first exile. Ye deemed not that they would go forth, while they deemed that their strongholds would protect them from Allah. But Allah reached them from a place whereof they reckoned not, and cast terror in their hearts so that they ruined their houses with their own hands…“[59:2]
“This is because they were opposed to Allah and his messenger ….” [59:4]
“Whatsoever palm trees ye cut down or left standing on their roots, it was by Allah’s leave, in order that he might confound the evil-livers.”[59:5]
“And that which Allah gives as spoil unto His messenger from them, ye urged not any horse or riding-camel for the sake thereof, but Allah giveth His messenger lordship over whom he will. Allah is able to do all things.”[59:6]
"The spoils of war taken from the town-dwellers and assigned by Allah to His apostle shall belong to Allah, to the Apostle and his kinsfolk, to orphans, .....” [59:7]

There's also a huge amount of wisdom in the Qur'an, such as the following.
“Every being that is in the heavens and on earth: all are devoutly obedient to Him.” [30:26] … and the Qur’an also makes hundreds of references to those who are not obedient [2:11-20, 3:10-12, etc etc] and the horrors that await them.

Iftekhar
13 February 2009 - 9:32pm

Male dominance in Muslim countries - ah! The eternal subject returns.

I read a headline in a local newspaper that contraceptive use has reached 56% over the last 30 years from a low of 7% in Bangladesh.

Indeed, the fertility rate has come down from 6 per woman to 3 in the same period. 

Given the premiss that women are dominated by men, the inescapable conclusion seems to me that men are FORCING more and more of 'their' women to gulp contraceptives. 

More than 2 million women work in the garments industry in Bangladesh: this trend began in the '80s. How did these women have the temerity to work in the teeth of opposition from husbands, brothers and fathers? 

Obvously, they were FORCED to work by these men. 

When the writer says that more and more women are working, she doesn't realise that she is contradicting the basic thesis of male-domination. If women are working, then how are they dominated? If women are having fewer children, then how are they dominated?

Muslim society, like most non-western societies, works by consensus. It is the same in the Muslim family. 

In fact, the trend seems to be the opposite of what the writer claims: more women, and men, are turning back to 'tradition'  and religion rather than embracing a 'modernity' that they find degrading. Freedom of expression? Pornography. Freedom to date boys? Date rape. Sexual freedom? Teenage sex and pregancy.I personally know many women who have left western countries because they were revolted by these things. If western society respects women, then we all respect zoo animals. 

In Bangladesh last year, around 200 women were raped - considered a high figure despite a population of 150 milion. In Britain, 61,000 rapes took place in a population half that size. If that's respect, then western men sure have odd ways of showing it (watch one film on the subject: The Dead Girl). 

Interestingly, in a World Bank report on health in the early '90s, it was observed that Muslim women are the safest in the world - Arab women had very little to fear from men as well as themselves (in terms of self-inflicted wounds). 

Their main source of danger? War. 

Analyse that. 

 

PS India has some remarkable laws on the family, and yet several thousand women there are sod intio temple prostitution every year. How come I never hear about that? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EthanII (not verified)
16 February 2009 - 4:57am

On Feb. 13, 2009, just as Iftekhar was denying there was a problem with male domination and violence in many Muslim families, and blaming western stereotypes for perpetuating this concern on the part of the public,, the following tragedy occurred:

On February 13, 2009, in Orchard Park, a suburb of Buffalo, 44 year-old Muzzamil Hassan, a prominent Muslim businessman, was arrested for having be-headed his wife, 37 year-old Aasiya Z. Hassan. Yes, he beheaded her. Aasiya's crime? She dared to obtain an order of protection which forced her violent husband out of their home.

We are now sadly familiar with some high profile Islamic beheadings of infidels in Muslim lands; Daniel Pearl, Nicholas Berg, immediately come to mind. Sadly, we are also familiar with the practice of beheading, dismembering, burying alive, and stoning Muslim women to death in Muslim lands--or throwing acid in their faces if they are "uncovered", as in Pakistan and Kashmir. But this took place in a suburb of Buffalo, New York.

What can this mean? Why behead a wife who simply wanted a divorce and who wanted to live free of daily violence? Why didn't Hassan just agree to a divorce?

Because this foul murder was a ritual honor killing, a crime which has everything to do with Muslim culture, and little to do with western-style domestic violence.

aspacia (not verified)
16 February 2009 - 4:30pm

Thank-you RobPC. The author fails to mention the fact that according to the Quran, women are inferior. Muslims can't step around that one.

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <h2> <h3> <div> <span> <blockquote> <!--break--> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr> <table> <td> <tr> <img> <map>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options